IPQ9574 vs IPQ5424: A Comprehensive Technical Comparison of Wi-Fi 7 SoCs
As Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) enters commercial deployment, system integrators are demanding higher performance, scalability, and ecosystem compatibility from network SoCs. Qualcomm, a leading innovator in this space, has launched multiple Wi-Fi 7 platforms to address diverse needs. Among them, the IPQ9574 and IPQ5424 stand out—targeting enterprise-grade and cost-optimized consumer/prosumer segments respectively.
This article provides a detailed, side-by-side comparison of these two SoCs, examining architecture, RF capabilities, software support, and application suitability to help developers make informed choices.
1. Positioning & Architecture
Feature | IPQ9574 | IPQ5424 |
---|---|---|
Market Segment | Enterprise AP / Industrial Mesh / High-end CPE | Mid-to-high Mesh Routers / Home Gateway / SMB CPE |
CPU Architecture | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.2GHz | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz |
Network Subsystem | Qualcomm NSS (Network Acceleration) | Fast Path only |
Process Node | 14nm | 14nm |
Memory Support | DDR4 / DDR5 (Up to 6.4Gbps+) | DDR3L / DDR4 (Up to 2.4Gbps) |
PCIe Interface | PCIe Gen4 x2/x1 | PCIe Gen3 x1 (Dual-lane) |
USB Support | USB 3.0 | USB 2.0 / USB 3.0 (varies) |
Insight: IPQ9574 provides higher throughput and concurrency thanks to its Cortex-A73 cores and dedicated NSS engine. In contrast, IPQ5424 is a cost-effective alternative designed for efficient, lower-power implementations.
2. Wi-Fi 7 Radio Capabilities (with 6GHz Support)
Feature | IPQ9574 | IPQ5424 |
---|---|---|
Frequency Bands | 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz (Tri-band) | 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz (Tri-band) |
Max Bandwidth | Supports 320MHz (6GHz) | Supports 320MHz (6GHz) |
Spatial Streams | 4x4x4 MU-MIMO | 2x2 + 2x2 Concurrent |
OFDMA / MU-MIMO | Full support | Basic support |
MLO (Multi-Link Operation) | Supported | Supported |
Beamforming | Advanced | Basic |
OpenWRT/OpenWiFi 6GHz Support | Not supported currently | Not supported currently |
Note: Although both chips technically support the 6GHz band and Wi-Fi 7 features, current open-source platforms like OpenWRT and OpenWiFi do not fully support 6GHz due to driver and regulatory limitations. Custom firmware or vendor SDKs are recommended for full feature enablement.
3. Interfaces & Expandability
Feature | IPQ9574 | IPQ5424 |
---|---|---|
Ethernet | Up to 1x 10G SFP+, multiple 2.5G / 1G ports | 2x 2.5G or 4x 1G options |
PCIe Expansion | Ideal for QCN9274/QCN6274 Wi-Fi 7 NICs | Compatible with dual-band Wi-Fi modules |
USB Peripherals | USB 3.0 for high-speed use cases | USB 2.0/3.0 for basic expansion/storage |
4. Software Ecosystem & Platform Support
Feature | IPQ9574 | IPQ5424 |
---|---|---|
SDK Availability | Qualcomm QSDK / Yocto | Qualcomm QSDK / Yocto |
OpenWRT Support | Supported (6GHz excluded) | Supported (6GHz excluded) |
OpenWiFi Support | Early-stage integration; not fully stable | Basic support; limited 6GHz features |
Security Features | Secure Boot / TPM / TrustZone | Secure Boot / TrustZone |
Cloud Integration | Plume, Ruckus, OpenWiFi controller | Home/ISP cloud systems |
5. Application Scenarios
✅ Recommended for IPQ9574:
- High-performance Wi-Fi 7 enterprise APs
- Industrial mesh networking (mining/oilfield, etc.)
- 5G/mmWave CPE with Wi-Fi 7 backhaul
- Multi-WAN gateways & edge compute nodes
✅ Recommended for IPQ5424:
- Tri-band home mesh routers
- Small business or retail Wi-Fi networks
- Cost-sensitive ISP Wi-Fi 7 rollouts
- Entry-level CPE or Wi-Fi node units
6. Selection Summary
Feature | IPQ9574 | IPQ5424 |
---|---|---|
Performance Level | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ |
Ecosystem Maturity | ★★★★☆ (vendor stack needed) | ★★★☆☆ |
6GHz Usability (now) | ★★☆☆☆ (requires custom drivers) | ★★☆☆☆ (limited by OSS) |
Tri-band NIC Compatibility | Excellent | Moderate |
Product Differentiation | High (flagship class) | Mid (value-driven) |
Conclusion
The IPQ9574 and IPQ5424 represent Qualcomm’s strategic push into the Wi-Fi 7 SoC market. IPQ9574 excels in high-throughput, tri-band, and enterprise use cases, while IPQ5424 enables more cost-efficient mass-market products.
Both chips offer full 6GHz hardware support, but developers should note that open-source platforms like OpenWRT and OpenWiFi currently lack stable 6GHz support. For full functionality, leveraging Qualcomm's QSDK or integrating with vendor firmware stacks is recommended.