dispatch_semaphore_wait(semaphore, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
/*
code
*/
对semaphore减一,如果得值小于0(注意是小于0),则等待,如果不小于0,则执行code处代码
所以如果是执行多个任务的话,一般把wait放在dispatch_async的block的第一行,因为会有多个dispatch_async,把dispatch_semaphore_signal(semaphore);放在dispatch_async中耗时任务真正完成的时候
实现类似dispatch_group的功能
dispatch_queue_t queue = dispatch_get_global_queue(0, 0);
dispatch_semaphore_t semaphore = dispatch_semaphore_create(5); //0
NSMutableArray *array = [NSMutableArray array];
for (int index = 0; index < 5; index++) {
NSLog(@"quene :%d", index);//1
dispatch_semaphore_wait(semaphore, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
dispatch_async(queue, ^(){
NSLog(@"addd :%d", index);//2
[array addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:index]];
dispatch_semaphore_signal(semaphore);
});
}
NSLog(@"执行完成");
异步改成同步
-(void)testSegiel
{
dispatch_queue_t queue = dispatch_get_global_queue(0, 0);
dispatch_semaphore_t semaphore = dispatch_semaphore_create(1); //0
NSMutableArray *array = [NSMutableArray array];
for (int index = 0; index < 10; index++) {
dispatch_async(queue, ^(){
NSLog(@"quene :%d", index);//1
dispatch_semaphore_wait(semaphore, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
NSLog(@"addd :%d", index);//2
[array addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:index]];
dispatch_semaphore_signal(semaphore);
});
}
}
运行结果
进行打印看结果,
2016-08-25 19:08:36.599 testNew[2880:2514251] async--->>>0
2016-08-25 19:08:36.599 testNew[2880:2513974] async--->>>1
2016-08-25 19:08:36.600 testNew[2880:2514252] async--->>>2
2016-08-25 19:08:36.600 testNew[2880:2514253] async--->>>3
2016-08-25 19:08:36.600 testNew[2880:2514254] async--->>>4
2016-08-25 19:08:36.600 testNew[2880:2514251] semaphore:0
2016-08-25 19:08:36.600 testNew[2880:2514255] async--->>>5
2016-08-25 19:08:36.600 testNew[2880:2514256] async--->>>6
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514251] async--->>>7
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514255] semaphore:5
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514257] async--->>>8
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514255] async--->>>9
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514252] semaphore:2
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514253] semaphore:3
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514254] semaphore:4
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2513974] semaphore:1
2016-08-25 19:08:36.601 testNew[2880:2514256] semaphore:6
2016-08-25 19:08:36.602 testNew[2880:2514251] semaphore:7
2016-08-25 19:08:36.602 testNew[2880:2514257] semaphore:8
2016-08-25 19:08:36.602 testNew[2880:2514255] semaphore:9
发现全部执行
就能看到其中1部分全部基本是顺序执行,2部分无序执行。
如果把是dispatch_semaphore_create(1)改成dispatch_semaphore_create(0)的话
就能看到其中1部分全部基本是顺序执行,2部分一直没有执行。
因为dispatch_semaphore_wait是进行信号量减1操作,而dispatch_semaphore_signal是进行加1操作。如果dispatch_semaphore_wait减1前如果小于1,则一直等待。同时这两者之间是线程无顺序的抢占资源,但只能允许一个线程执行。所以猜测如果某一时刻进行了dispatch_semaphore_signal操作,则会继续执行