汽车电子PKE与RKE学习笔记

简介

      因自己从事的工作对于汽车电子有一定了解与认知,今天给大家分享一些自己学习PKE与RKE时的学习笔记,希望能给大家一些启示,同时不对的地方请批评指正。

       随着汽车电子行业的发展,从最开始用户使用遥控钥匙解闭锁车辆进入,也就是我们常说的RKE(Remote Keyless Entry 遥控无钥门禁)方式,到用户可以按下车辆门把手的微动开关来实现车辆解闭锁,以至于延伸到现在用户只需要携带合法钥匙靠近车辆就可以解闭锁车辆,统称为PKE(Passive Keyless Entry被动无钥门禁)方式,解闭锁车辆的方式也从需要用户主动操作变为车辆主动完成钥匙与车辆匹配合法钥匙来完成解闭锁车辆操作。

RKE

       完成RKE功能需要有两个条件,一个是钥匙内的信号发射基站,另一个是车端的信号接收器,同时这两端需要有相同的钥匙密匙与加密算法(完成遥控钥匙中密钥配置,这就不得不提及钥匙学习功能,之后有机会再分享),用户在按下钥匙中的按键时,钥匙基站会利用编码器来制作信号发送的编码,然后利用RF发射器以超高频带(例如,北美的 315 MHz,欧洲的 433 MHz)向车辆接收器发送单向信号,这个单向信号中有预先准备的身份验证代码与操作指令(这个具体根据选择的编码方式进行信号信息排列,还可以涵盖钥匙其他相关的信息,例如钥匙电量等信息),车端的信号接收器接收到高频信号之后,会对身份验证代码进行解密,解密成功之后认定钥匙具备操作车辆权限,相关控制器发送网络管理报文唤醒车辆,并通过CAN信号/LIN信号传输执行钥匙解

### RKE vs PKE: Differences in Kubernetes Cluster Management Tools #### Overview of RKE and PKE RKE (Rancher Kubernetes Engine) is a simple, lightweight tool designed to deploy production-ready Kubernetes clusters on any infrastructure. This tool simplifies the deployment process by managing all necessary configurations and files required for maintaining Kubernetes cluster state[^4]. On the other hand, PKE (Packet Kubernetes Engine), now known as Equinix Metal Kubernetes Service (EKS.Metal), focuses specifically on deploying Kubernetes clusters on bare metal servers provided by Equinix Metal. #### Deployment Methodology For RKE deployments, different versions manage Kubernetes cluster states using distinct sets of configuration files stored within the working directory[^1]. In contrast, PKE leverages dedicated hardware resources from Equinix Metal, ensuring optimal performance through direct access to physical machines without virtualization overhead. #### Integration with Other Tools When integrating additional tools or platforms into your workflow, options vary between these two engines. For instance, while both support integration with monitoring systems like Prometheus, only RKE offers seamless compatibility with Terraform via the **Terraform Provider for RKE**, enhancing automation capabilities during setup phases[^3]. ```bash terraform { required_providers { rke = { source = "rancher/rke" version = "~> 0.9" } } } ``` #### Standardized Approaches Regarding standardized approaches towards Kubernetes deployment, there exists a notable difference. While RKE uses non-standard open-source methods, which may require manual intervention at times, PKE benefits more directly from cloud provider-specific optimizations since it operates primarily over Equinix Metal's infrastructure. #### Community Support and Updates Both projects enjoy active community involvement; however, due to its broader applicability across various environments beyond just Equinix Metal, RKE tends to receive updates that cater to diverse user needs globally. Meanwhile, improvements made to PKE often focus on refining features specific to running workloads efficiently on bare-metal architectures. --related questions-- 1. What are some best practices when setting up an RKE-based Kubernetes environment? 2. How does leveraging Terraform alongside RKE improve DevOps workflows? 3. Can you provide examples where using Packet’s bare metal solution has advantages over traditional VM setups? 4. Are there significant security differences between managing clusters with RKE versus those managed exclusively on Equinix Metal?
评论 2
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值