苹果app反垄断案败诉_谷歌在澳大利亚败诉搜索引擎结果“诽谤”案-CSDN博客

苹果app反垄断案败诉

Google has lost a defamation lawsuit initially filed by Milorad Trkulja because search results such as “Melbourne Crime” was showing an image of Mr. Trkulja which the Jury in the Supreme Court in the Australian state of Victoria found Google guilty of defamation because it connected Mr. Trkulja to search results such as “Melbourne Crime” and other terms which can create the perception that Milorad was part of some form of crime in Melbourne and the portrayal that a rival had hired a hitman to murder him.

Google失去了最初由Milorad Trkulja提起的诽谤诉讼，因为搜索结果(例如“墨尔本犯罪”)显示了Trkulja先生的图片，澳大利亚维多利亚州最高法院的陪审团认为Google涉嫌诽谤，因为它与Mr. Trkulja搜索诸如“墨尔本犯罪”之类的结果，以及可能使人联想到米洛拉德是墨尔本某种形式犯罪的一种说法，以及描述竞争对手雇用了杀手杀害他的肖像。

The court in Australia did side with Google favourably regarding Google’s defence that the search results were based on automated software and that, as a result, Google defended itself on “innocent dissemination”. The Jury found this a reasonable argument only up to the point until Google received a complaint, at which point the court said the content should have been removed at the point of having receipt of the complaint from Mr. Trkulja.

澳大利亚法院在谷歌的辩护中对谷歌表示了支持，谷歌的辩护是搜索结果基于自动化软件，因此谷歌为“无害传播”辩护。陪审团认为，直到Google收到投诉之前，这才是合理的论点，当时法院说，在收到Trkulja先生的投诉之时，该内容应已删除。

Because the Jury has found Google guilty, within the next few weeks, the Judge overseeing the court case will determine the damages that Google will need to pay. Retrospectively, Mr. Trkulja had won a similar case against Yahoo! which resulted in the court awarding Milorad with damages around $250,000 USD (approximately £154,000).

由于陪审团裁定Google有罪，因此在接下来的几周内，负责监督此案的法官将确定Google需要支付的赔偿金。追溯地，特尔库利亚先生在针对Yahoo!的类似案件中也获胜。导致法院判给Milorad约250,000美元(约合154,000英镑)的损失。

Mr. Milorad Trkulja had said that the case against Google is “not about the money, it’s about protecting my family, my children and my reputation.”

米洛拉德·特尔库利亚(Milorad Trkulja)先生曾说，针对Google的诉讼“不是钱，而是保护我的家人，孩子和我的名誉。”

Even though Google has an automated search indexing system and preferably does not want to remove any content even that may be considered controversial, defamatory or offensive, it appears the company are going to need to be more flexible to avoid ending up having to pay a lot of money for similar cases like this.

即使Google拥有自动搜索索引系统，并且甚至不希望删除可能被认为有争议，诽谤或令人反感的任何内容，但该公司似乎仍需要更加灵活，以免最终不得不支付大量费用类似情况的钱。