twitter无手机号检查_如何检查Twitter帐户是否为Bot

twitter无手机号检查

There are a lot of bots on Twitter. Some are trying to sell things, some are stage one in an elaborate scam, and some are run by international intelligence agencies for any number of reasons.

Twitter上有很多机器人。 一些试图出售东西，一些处于精心设计的骗局的第一阶段，一些出于各种原因由国际情报机构管理。

Spotting these bots isn’t necessarily hard: just scroll through the timeline and see whether their activity resembles that of a human. Do they converse with friends, as humans do, or do they just say things to users who never talk back? Do they have a diverse range of interests, as humans do, or do they stick to one topic? Keep these things in mind and you can get an idea of whether something is a bot.

发现这些机器人不一定很困难：只需滚动时间轴，看看它们的活动是否类似于人类的活动。 他们是像人类一样与朋友交谈，还是只是向从未回头的用户说话？ 他们像人类一样具有广泛的兴趣爱好，还是坚持一个主题？ 请牢记这些内容，您可以了解某个东西是否是机器人。

For those times, however, that you just can’t tell whether you’re looking at a bot or a person, Botometer can help. This tool, from Indiana University and Northeastern University, considers over 1000 factors, and then gives you a probability that a given Twitter user is or isn’t a bot. It isn’t perfect, because this is a hard problem to solve, but Botometer is a great tool to have around.

但是，对于那些时候，您只是无法分辨是在看机器人还是在看人 ， Botometer可以提供帮助。 该工具来自印第安纳大学和东北大学，考虑了1000多个因素，然后为您提供给定Twitter用户是否为机器人的可能性。 它不是完美的，因为这是一个很难解决的问题，但是Botometer是一个很好的工具。

To get started, sign in to Botometer with your Twitter account, and then start adding any username you’re curious about. You’ll see the result quickly:

首先，请使用您的Twitter帐户登录Botometer，然后开始添加您感兴趣的任何用户名。 您会很快看到结果：

What does this mean? The higher the percentage on the “Bot Score,” the more likely a given user is a bot. According to the Botometer FAQ page:

这是什么意思？ “ Bot分数”上的百分比越高，给定用户成为机器人的可能性就越大。 根据Botometer常见问题页面 ：

Roughly speaking, one can interpret a bot score as a likelihood that the user is a bot. As such, bot scores closer to the extreme values of 0% and 100% are more confident assertions of the account’s bot-ness.

粗略地说，人们可以将机器人得分解释为用户是机器人的可能性。 因此，漫游器得分接近0％和100％的极端值是对帐户漫游器的更有把握的断言。

In this case, Botometer thinks there’s only a 16 percent chance my co-worker Harry is a bot. It’s a reasonable conclusion. I’ve worked with Harry for years, and still occasionally suspect he isn’t real—but only like 16 percent of the time.

在这种情况下，Botometer认为我的同事Harry是机器人的可能性只有16％。 这是一个合理的结论。 我已经和Harry在一起工作了很多年，但仍然偶尔会怀疑他不是真实的人，但是只有16％的时间。

There are a few things we can dig into using the “Details” link at right of the results. For example, we can see a timeline of when the user was last mentioned and retweeted.

我们可以使用结果右侧的“详细信息”链接来挖掘一些内容。 例如，我们可以看到上次提及用户和转发该用户的时间轴。

You can also see a breakdown of the kinds of sentiments the user defaults to, and a breakdown of word usage (noun/verb/adjective/etc.) These are just a few factors used by the service, but diving into them can prove fascinating.

您还可以看到用户默认的情绪细目分类以及单词用法的细目分类(名词/动词/形容词/等)，这些只是服务使用的一些因素，但是深入研究它们可以证明引人入胜。

I ran this by a few known bots, and a few people I’m reasonably certain are humans. Precise percentages varied, but for the most part I found the results reliable. The main exceptions tend to be Twitter accounts run by multiple people, including those of politicians and brands. This makes sense to me, because such accounts frequently behave in bot-like ways—they tend to be focused on single topics and often don’t engage in conversations the way normal users do.

我是由一些知名的bot来运行的，我可以肯定地确定有一些人是人类。 精确的百分比各不相同，但是我发现大部分结果都是可靠的。 主要的例外往往是由多个人(包括政客和品牌的人)管理的Twitter帐户。 这对我来说很有意义，因为此类帐户经常以类似机器人的方式进行操作-它们倾向于只关注单个主题，并且通常不像普通用户那样进行对话。

If an account you know is a bot keeps @ing you, learn how to block a Twitter account, and consider also reporting it.

如果您知道是机器人的帐户一直在跟踪您，请学习如何阻止Twitter帐户 ，并考虑也进行举报 。

翻译自: https://www.howtogeek.com/325232/how-to-check-if-a-twitter-account-is-a-bot/

twitter无手机号检查