期刊论文审查意见
When should the authors anonymize themselves in a paper submitted to a conference for review?
作者什么时候应该在提交给会议进行审查的论文中匿名？
Several general concepts:
几个一般概念 ：
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work (peers). — Wikipedia
同行评审是指由一个或多个与作品的制作者（同行）具有类似能力的人员对作品进行的评估。 — 维基百科
Single-blind describes experiments where information that could introduce bias or otherwise skew the result is withheld from the participants, but the experimenter will be in full possession of the facts.
单盲描述了实验，在实验中会从参与者那里隐瞒可能引入偏差或以其他方式歪曲结果的信息，但是实验者将完全掌握事实。
Double-blind describes an especially stringent way of conducting an experiment which attempts to eliminate subjective, unrecognized biases carried by an experiment’s subjects (usually human) and conductors. — Wikipedia
双盲描述了进行实验的一种特别严格的方法，该方法试图消除实验对象（通常是人类）和导体所带来的主观，无法识别的偏见。 — 维基百科
In summary, “peer reviewed” means that your paper will be reviewed by one ore more reviewers before being accepted/published. If the peer review process is single-blind or double-blind, you should anonymize yourselves.
总之 ，“同行评审”是指您的论文将在接受/发表之前由一位或多位审稿人进行审阅。 如果同行评审过程是单盲或双盲，则应自行匿名。
How and what to anonymize for papers depends on the conference/journal’s requirement. For a general reference, you may take a look at the Section “Anonymizing rules” of SOSP 2013’s “Submission Guidelines”:
如何以及以什么方式使论文匿名化取决于会议/期刊的要求。 作为一般参考，您可以查看SOSP 2013的“提交准则”的 “匿名化规则”部分：
As an author, you should not identify yourself in the paper either explicitly or by implication (e.g., through the references or acknowledgments). However, only non-destructive anonymization is required. For example, system names may be left un-anonymized, if the system name is important for a reviewer to be able to evaluate the work.
…
Additionally, please take the following steps when preparing your submission:作为作者，您不应在文件中明确或暗示自己的身份（例如，通过参考文献或致谢）。 但是，仅需要非破坏性的匿名化。 例如，如果系统名称对于审阅者能够评估作品很重要，则系统名称可以不加匿名。
…
此外，在准备提交时，请执行以下步骤：
Remove authors’ names and affiliations from the title page.
从标题页中删除作者的姓名和从属关系。
Remove acknowledgement of identifying names and funding sources.
删除对姓名和资金来源的确认。
Use care in naming your files. Source file names, e.g., Joe.Smith.dvi,
are often embedded in the final output as readily accessible comments.在命名文件时要格外小心。 源文件名，例如Joe.Smith.dvi，
通常作为易于访问的注释嵌入最终输出中。Use care in referring to related work, particularly your own. Do not
omit references to provide anonymity, as this leaves the reviewer
unable to grasp the context. Instead, a good solution is to reference
your past work in the third person, just as you would any other piece
of related work.注意相关工作，尤其是您自己的工作。 不要
省略提供匿名的引用，因为这会使审阅者离开
无法掌握上下文。 相反，一个好的解决方案是参考
您过去在第三人称视角中所做的工作，就像您在其他作品中所做的一样
相关工作。If you have a concurrent submission, reference it as follows: “Closely
related work describes a microkernel implementation [Anonymous 2013].”
with the corresponding citation: “[Anonymous 2013] Under submission.
Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.”如果您有并发提交，请参考以下内容：
相关工作描述了微内核的实现[Anonymous 2013]。”
并带有相应的引文：“ [匿名2013]提交中。
省略详细信息以进行双盲审核。”Work that extends an author’s previous workshop paper is welcome, but
authors should (a) acknowledge their own previous workshop
publications with an anonymous citation and (b) explain the
differences between the SOSP submission and the prior workshop paper.欢迎扩展作者先前的研讨会论文的工作，但
作者应（a）承认自己以前的工作坊
带有匿名引用的出版物，以及（b）解释
SOSP提交的内容与先前的研讨会论文之间的差异。If you cite anonymous work, you must also send the deanonymized
reference(s) to the PC chair in a separate email.如果您引用匿名作品，则还必须发送已取消匿名的作品
在单独的电子邮件中提及PC主席。We recognize that, even following these guidelines, closely building
on your own prior work may indirectly reveal your identity. Even
though a reviewer might think they can guess which group you are from,
s/he should have some doubts.我们认识到，即使遵循这些准则，
您以前的工作可能会间接透露您的身份。 甚至
尽管评论者可能认为他们可以猜出您来自哪个组，
他/他应该有一些疑问。
期刊论文审查意见
扫一扫
2110
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
