dreamhost 好用吗_为DreamHost共享主机启用SSD：简单的性能评估

dreamhost 好用吗

As you may know, SysTutorials is hosted by DreamHost and we are quite satisfied with DreamHost. Now, DreamHost turns to be the first big player that enables solid state drives (SSD) for its Linux-based shared hosting plan in the shared hosting market and we are happy to enjoy the improvement.

如您所知， SysTutorials由DreamHost托管，我们对DreamHost感到非常满意。 现在，DreamHost成为第一个在共享主机市场中为其基于Linux的共享主机计划启用固态驱动器（SSD）的大型公司，我们很乐意享受这一改进。

SSD is common for VPS and PaaS virtual machines for higher I/O performance. Now, it is coming to shared hosting too.

SSD在VPS和PaaS虚拟机中很常见，具有更高的I / O性能。 现在，它也将进入共享托管。

DreamHost claims that “Now with solid state drives (SSDs), our standard web hosting loads pages 200% faster”.

DreamHost声称：“现在有了固态驱动器（SSD），我们的标准网络托管可以使页面加载速度提高200％”。

We ourselves are happy to know this performance improvement with the price kept the same. Good work, DreamHost.

我们自己很高兴知道在保持价格不变的情况下性能的提高。 做得好，DreamHost。

Dreamhost上简单的I / O性能的测量共享托管帐户∞ (Simple I/O performance measurement on DreamHost shared hosting account ∞)

To see how does the new SSD-based storage performs, we did simple tests in one account on one server of DreamHost’s shared hosting. The test is simple: moving files from the home (mounted XFS filesystem which stores the site content) and /dev/shm/ which is a in-memory file system or using dd go generate files. The results will reflect how the reads and write perform.

为了了解新的基于SSD的存储的性能如何，我们在DreamHost共享主机的一台服务器上的一个帐户中进行了简单测试。 测试很简单：从家中移动文件 （存储站点内容的已挂载XFS文件系统）和/dev/shm/它是内存文件系统），或者使用dd go生成文件。 结果将反映读取和写入的性能。

Note that we do not have the root access to flush buffers and invalidate caches, and there are many concurrent users. Hence, the server should be considered relatively busy, and the result here should only be viewed as a general “feeling” of the performance.

请注意，我们没有对刷新缓冲区和无效缓存的根访问权限，并且有许多并发用户。 因此，应将服务器视为相对繁忙的服务器，此处的结果仅应视为对性能的总体“感觉”。

移动小文件∞ (Moving small files ∞)

The commands and results are shown as follows.

命令和结果如下所示。

test@seginus:~$ ls -lha 49MBfile.pdf
-rwxr-xr-x 1 test pg000000 49M Mar  5 23:23 49MBfile.pdf

test@seginus:~$ time mv ./49MBfile.pdf /dev/shm/
real	0m0.602s
user	0m0.012s
sys	0m0.176s

test@seginus:~$ time mv /dev/shm/49MBfile.pdf ./
real	0m0.307s
user	0m0.008s
sys	0m0.216s

test@seginus:~$ time mv ./49MBfile.pdf /dev/shm/
real	0m0.291s
user	0m0.016s
sys	0m0.172s

test@seginus:~$ time mv /dev/shm/49MBfile.pdf ./
real	0m0.225s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.208s

test@seginus:~$ time mv ./49MBfile.pdf /dev/shm/
real	0m0.331s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.188s

test@seginus:~$ time mv /dev/shm/49MBfile.pdf ./
real	0m0.262s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.216s

If we consider the largest 0.602s as the worst time for accessing the 49MB file, the throughput is still around 81.4 MB/s.

如果我们将最大的0.602s作为访问49MB文件的最差时间，则吞吐量仍然约为81.4 MB / s 。

dd和移动大文件∞ (dd and moving large files ∞)

The commands and results are as follows.

命令和结果如下。

test@seginus:~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=./testfile bs=512M count=1 oflag=direct
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 9.26255 s, 58.0 MB/s
test@seginus:~$ time mv testfile /dev/shm/

real	0m4.802s
user	0m0.052s
sys	0m2.148s

The write and read throughput are 58.0 MB/s and 106.6 MB/s.

写入和读取吞吐量分别为58.0 MB / s和106.6 MB / s 。

Although these numbers may not represent the exact actual I/O throughput for your site as the server may be busier or freer depending on the load, these results do reflect that the performance is good regarding the low price of the shared hosting plan.

尽管这些数字可能不能代表您站点的实际实际I / O吞吐量，因为服务器可能会更忙或更忙（取决于负载），但这些结果确实反映了在共享托管计划价格低廉的情况下性能良好。

If you would like to host your sites on DreamHost as we do and have read up to this part, we have a bonus for you: register with this affiliation link and you will enjoy the $2.45/month fee plus a free domain name.

如果您希望像我们一样在DreamHost上托管您的网站并阅读了本部分，我们将为您提供额外的好处：注册此会员链接 ，您将享受每月2.45美元的费用以及免费的域名。

翻译自: https://www.systutorials.com/ssd-enabled-for-dreamhost-shared-hosting-performance-measurement/

dreamhost 好用吗