github编码设置_GitHub Activity Guilt和编码器的FitBit

github编码设置

I got an interesting email today from Corey P., reprinted in part here, with permission.

今天，我收到了来自Corey P.的一封有趣的电子邮件，经许可，此处已部分转载。

I’m curious, how you feel about GitHub’s activity graph? I’ve found myself getting increased levels of guilt/stress over that graph. So much so I’m considering not using GitHub for personal projects (only use it for contributing pull requests, reporting issues, etc.). 

我很好奇，您对GitHub的活动图有何看法？ 我发现自己对那张图感到内/压力越来越大。 因此，我考虑不将GitHub用于个人项目(仅将其用于提供拉取请求，报告问题等)。

I can’t help but feel like others judge me by it (phony syndrome?). I have this gnawing feeling that I need to do something in the open so I can have some sort of paper trail or else I’ll be looked down upon by people (perspective employers? colleagues?).

我禁不住要像其他人那样评价我(语音综合症？)。 我有种不安的感觉，我需要在公开场合做些事情，这样我才能有某种形式的书面记录，否则我会被人们(潜在的雇主或同事)鄙视。

This is a great question. Let's look at my GitHub Graph.

这是一个很好的问题。 让我们看看我的GitHub Graph。

Yikes. Is this good or bad? It's pretty spartan over Sep-Nov, although I was travelling a lot.

kes。 这是好事还是坏事？ 尽管我经常旅行，但在9月至11月这是相当斯巴达式的。

Maybe Damian Edwards? He leads ASP.NET, although he isn't technically a dev (as far as HR is concerned). He's got me beat by double.

也许达米安·爱德华兹(Damian Edwards)？ 尽管从技术上讲他不是一名开发人员(就人力资源而言)，但他还是领导ASP.NET。 他让我败北。

OK, what's a serious contender look like? Here's Monica Dinculescu, Googler and dev on Polymer:

好吧，一个认真的竞争者长什么样？ 这是Monica Dinculescu，Googler和Polymer的开发人员：

or David Fowler, architect and dev on ASP.NET

或ASP.NET的架构师和开发人员David Fowler

What's our takeaway here? That I suck and Monica's amazing? (True, though, I do suck, and please have a listen to Monica as she explains Web Components to me on a recent podcast episode)

我们这里有什么要点？ 我很烂，莫妮卡很棒吗？ (但是，确实，我确实很烂，请听莫妮卡在最近的一集播客中向我解释Web Components时听)

Here's what I think about charts like this, and I'm interested in your opinion.

这就是我对此类图表的看法，我对您的观点感兴趣。

• GitHub's activity chart shows public repos, not private activity.
  GitHub的活动图表显示了公共仓库，而不是私人活动。
• I have a lot of small projects I work on during the week in private or local repos. and sometimes I don't make them public due to (slight) embarrassment at my works in progress.
  我在一周中的私人或本地存储库中从事许多小型项目。 有时由于我在进行中的作品有些尴尬，我有时不公开它们。
• It's not always healthy to measure yourself against others, particularly if it makes you feel bad or is somewhat unhealthy.
  与他人相处并不总是很健康，尤其是当它使您感到难过或有些不健康时。

• Jobs vary. Being a manager does take you away from coding sometimes.

  工作因人而异。 成为经理确实会使您摆脱编码的麻烦。

• If it bothers you, set a reasonable goal and work towards it, but do it for a good reason. (See how Reason and Reasonable factor in greatly there?)

  如果它使您感到困扰，请设定一个合理的目标并朝着这个目标努力，但是这样做是有充分理由的。 (看看其中的理性和合理因素如何？)

Will I ever be as prolific as Monica or David? Likely not, but it's cool to know what the top of the bar is. Also, we have different jobs. Monica is working actively on a public open source project, while I'm not currently committing code to ASP.NET Core. Even Damian, a Lead PM on ASP.NET Core gets caught up in the "management" of it all. I doubt he gives his green chart a second thought.

我会像莫妮卡或大卫一样多产吗？ 可能不是，但是知道酒吧的顶部是很酷的。 另外，我们有不同的工作。 Monica正在积极致力于公共开源项目，而我目前尚未将代码提交给ASP.NET Core。 甚至ASP.NET Core的首席PM达米安(Damian)也陷入了这一切的“管理”中。 我怀疑他是否会重新考虑他的绿色图表。

My job currently doesn't have me committing to public repros as often as I'd like, but I'm not going let this chart dictate my value to the team. I will use it as one of many measuring sticks and I'd encourage you to as well. Perhaps set a goal to commit to an OSS project a few times a week?

目前，我的工作并没有让我愿意像公众希望的那样频繁地去做公众代表，但是我不会让这个图表决定我对团队的价值。 我将它用作许多量尺中的一种，我也鼓励您使用。 也许设定一个每周承诺几次致力于OSS项目的目标？

与招聘相关的GitHub Acitivty (GitHub Acitivty as it relates to Hiring)

Sasha Laundy brought up a number of important points on Twitter about your GitHub Activity graph. She says:

Sasha Laundy在Twitter上提出了有关GitHub活动图的许多重要观点。 她说：

If GitHub commits are only side projects, what kinds of people have time to put towards that? and if you can be silently discredited in hiring because of your public profile, how does that impact equity & diversity?

如果GitHub提交只是辅助项目，那么什么样的人有时间来解决这个问题？ 并且，如果您因公开身份而在录用方面无声地抹黑，那对平等和多样性有何影响？

She has a great point. It's worth arguing that given the GitHub Activity Graph shows only public activity, making judgments based on it would naturally skew towards:

她说得很对。 值得争论的是，鉴于GitHub活动图仅显示公共活动，因此基于该活动做出的判断自然会偏向于：

• The already skilled vs. the codenewbie
  已经熟练的vs.代码新手
• People with more spare time, e.g. young, single, etc
  有更多业余时间的人，例如年轻，单身等
• Folks who work on OSS full-time (their company pays them to commit publically to code)
  专职于OSS的人们(他们的公司付钱给他们公开承诺编写代码)

To her point, if your GitHub Activity page is given similar weight as your LinkedIn, how will you ever know if you've been quietly excluded from a job based on this chart? If you're just getting started or if you're a 20 year Enterprise software developer you may end up with an empty graph and find an uninformed recruiter glossed over your potential or experience based how much "green" they see.

就她而言，如果您的GitHub活动页面的权重与LinkedIn的权重相同，您如何知道是否已根据此图表悄悄地将您排除在工作之外？ 如果您才刚刚起步，或者您是20年企业软件开发人员，那么您可能会得到一个空白的图表，并根据他们看到的“绿色”数量，找到一个不知情的招聘人员来掩盖您的潜力或经验。

What do YOU think of this? Does your GitHub Activity Graph stress you out like getting 10,000 steps on your FitBit? Or do you just roll with it? Sound off in the comments.

你觉得这怎么样？ 您的GitHub活动图是否会让您感到压力，例如在FitBit上获得10,000个步骤？ 还是只是顺其自然？ 在评论中听起来不错。

翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/github-activity-guilt-and-the-coders-fitbit

github编码设置