最爱macd_2014最爱

最爱macd

That time of year again! Here are the five most popular posts of 2014, in order.

一年中的那个时候！ 以下是2014年最受欢迎的五种帖子。

快速足够 (Fast Enough)

How fast is fast enough? Page weights and load times vary so much from site to site and industry to industry. While it’s easy to spot the obviously bad examples, it can be much more difficult to find the line between is “fast enough” and what is slow.

多快才足够快？ 页面权重和加载时间因站点和行业而异。 尽管很容易发现明显的不良示例，但要找到“足够快”和较慢之间的界限可能会更加困难。

“ RWD对性能不利”对性能有利 (“RWD Is Bad for Performance” Is Good for Performance)

Myths are powerful things. Put the right spin on a myth and you can use it to build up; to create something new and better. I’ve found the “responsive design is bad for performance” myth to be really good for performance.

神话是有力的东西。 正确地讲一个神话，就可以用它来建立； 创造新的更好的东西。 我发现“响应式设计不利于性能”的神话确实对性能有利。

JS解析和执行时间 (JS Parse and Execution Time)

Too often we focus merely on size and request count when discussing the use of JavaScript from a performance perspective. Using a tool built by Daniel Espeset, I tried to put some numbers to the parse and execution times of scripts as well.

从性能的角度讨论JavaScript的使用时，我们经常只关注大小和请求数。 使用丹尼尔·埃斯佩塞特 ( Daniel Espeset)构建的工具，我也尝试为脚本的解析和执行时间添加一些数字。

绩效预算指标 (Performance Budget Metrics)

Which metric(s) should you use for a performance budget? I tried to sort the basic performance metrics into four distinct categories and identify how to use each in a budget.

您应该将哪个指标用于绩效预算？ 我试图将基本绩效指标分为四个不同的类别，并确定如何在预算中使用它们。

为什么RWD看起来像RWD (Why RWD Looks Like RWD)

Earlier in the year, there was a lot of discussion about why responsive design “looks” like responsive design. I threw my hat into the ring with a few theories.

在今年早些时候，关于为什么响应式设计“看起来”像响应式设计有很多讨论。 我用一些理论把帽子扔进了戒指。

其他年份 (Other years)

• 2013 Favorites

  2013最爱

• 2012 Favorites

  2012收藏

翻译自: https://timkadlec.com/2014/12/2014-favorites/

最爱macd