丁磊等人不值得憎恶

丁磊等人不值得憎恶

 

文/王易见(欢迎翻译和约稿等合作)
QQ 543415188 
 
我一直仰慕丁磊并觉得他是值得我崇拜的偶像之一，今天看了丁磊对网游的评论，甚为钦佩，他对很多问题不但说到了点子上，甚至一针见血。
 
我以前也很痛恨网游，但后来我觉得这个并不是根本问题。就像当初很多人痛恨陈天桥一样，如果没有陈天桥，难保不会出现李天桥张天桥，同理，如果没有网游，也难保不会出现比网游更有杀伤力的玩意儿。人们在茶余饭饱之后必定会找方式方法消遣，那些小孩儿，中年人甚至部分老年人沉溺于超女好男也是这个道理。

网游对为成年人的危害是显而易见的，网游也很赚钱，正如丁磊所说，成天睡大觉也可日进斗金。但网游赚钱，取之有道，有人说网游赚了黑心钱，堕落了年轻人的意志和志向，此话也不假。
 
问题就在于主动性的问题，主动权还是在你身上，换句话说自己要做这样的选择，如之奈何？有人说史玉柱很黑，我倒要反问汝“一个愿打，一个愿挨”你怪谁啊，像我从来不玩游戏，他赚不到我一分钱。很多朋友也比喻网游为精神鸦片，我相信，绝大多数人不会主动去吸食鸦片，既然如此，你为什么要主动吸食网游这道精神鸦片呢？
 
然而，网游也并非有百害而无一利，从互联网发展角度来看，网游是起积极作用的；从经济发展角度来看，网游有推波助澜的作用。网游虽然有负面影响，但不至于废弃，或因噎废食。至于网游先天性的弊端，我想一方面和这个行业的成熟和规范密切相关，另一方面也有其他方面的原因，例如丁磊提到的家教。
 
网游的泛滥和中国的家教有直接的关系。中国的父母总希望给子女创造一个衣来伸手饭来张口的优良环境，而把子女的精神教育和道德教育置于学校高堂之上。从中国传统的家教看来，父母和托儿所的阿姨没有两样。正如丁磊所说，很多孩子找不到温暖于是才沉溺于网络游戏。
 
而且，有句话叫“屁股决定脑袋”，我保证今天喊枪毙网游的人如果是坐到了丁磊的位置上去，其想法一定有不同。同时，这也反映出另外一个问题，很多人不喜欢在自己身上找问题的原因，总把原因归到别人身上。而搞互联网也是，不管你怎么做，总有人说你不好。似乎我听朋友说过这样一个故事，一个访谈类节目上，陈天桥和金庸同时在场，在场有观众问陈天桥如何看待网游对青少年产生的负面影响，陈天桥说当年金庸写小说时也有人这么问过，现在呢？看来，问题是同一个问题，就看你怎么看了。

 

Never mind for William Ding

 

All the times I admired William Ding very much, I consider him as one of my idols I should admire. Recently , he published some comment on on-line games. I think most of his suggestions are so classical.

 

I hate on-line games very much some time ago. But later I change my opinion because I think it is not the question. Just as many people abhor cruelty Tianqiao Chen. No Chen, there will be others to instead. We know if no on-line games, there maybe some other games, even be more attractive. They always need some ways or channels to enjoy their life. Some children, middle-age or even old people fell in love with “Supper girls”. That’s the same as on-line games.

 

On-line games are harmful of course. But they are also profitable. Just as William Ding said, you can gain a lot of money while staying in bed. It has enough reason to gain profit and you can’t find fault. Some friends suggest that it make a lot of malfeasant money and harm the character of youth. It is also reasonable.

 

The problem is who can control the whole situation? The initiative is based on you. In other words, if you want to play the games, no body cares. Some people criticized Yuzhu Shi but I think it is the problem of business. If you don’t play it, he can’t gain any money from you. Yes, we can compare the games with opium. I believe nobody want to take in opium. If that, why do you choose games, which are considered as spiritual opium.

 

However, it is not wholly harmful for on-line games. From the point of Internet, it is proactive. From the point of economy, it is useful. We should admit there are some weak points and passive effects. But we can’t give up it. The whole industry needs time to be perfect.

 

There are some direct relationships between on-line games and home education. In China, the parents always hope to create one comfortable environment for the children. They pay no attention to the spiritual education and morality education. There is no difference between parents and the aunties of nursery. William Ding pointed out that many children can’t find their dream and warm so they addict themselves to on-line games.

 

Moreover, one words called “the arse decides the head”. I can make sure that the people who oppose on-line games will change their opinions if they become the second or the third William Ding. The another problem is many people due the cause to others. For Internet, no matter how do you perform, there must be many people criticize you.

 

分享到新浪微博