目前有两种注解方式实现在一个类中实现依赖注入,@Resource 和 @Autowired
目前网上资料关于这两者的区别有如下几点:
1、来源不同
Resource注解是由javax.annotation.Resource,不是spring框架的,而Autowired由spring所提供,其位于org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired
2、支持装配类型不同
Autowired只能按照类型进行装配,而Resource不仅能按照类型进行装配,还可以按照名称进行装配
- 按名称装配其实现细节如下:
protected void autowireByName(
String beanName, AbstractBeanDefinition mbd, BeanWrapper bw, MutablePropertyValues pvs) {
String[] propertyNames = unsatisfiedNonSimpleProperties(mbd, bw);
for (String propertyName : propertyNames) {
if (containsBean(propertyName)) { //从单例池中根据名称获取bean
Object bean = getBean(propertyName);
pvs.add(propertyName, bean);
registerDependentBean(propertyName, beanName);
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Added autowiring by name from bean name '" + beanName +
"' via property '" + propertyName + "' to bean named '" + propertyName + "'");
}
}
else {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Not autowiring property '" + propertyName + "' of bean '" + beanName +
"' by name: no matching bean found");
}
}
}
}
- 按类型装配其细节如下:
protected void autowireByType(
String beanName, AbstractBeanDefinition mbd, BeanWrapper bw, MutablePropertyValues pvs) {
TypeConverter converter = getCustomTypeConverter();
if (converter == null) {
converter = bw;
}
Set<String> autowiredBeanNames = new LinkedHashSet<>(4);
String[] propertyNames = unsatisfiedNonSimpleProperties(mbd, bw);
for (String propertyName : propertyNames) {
try {
PropertyDescriptor pd = bw.getPropertyDescriptor(propertyName);
// Don't try autowiring by type for type Object: never makes sense,
// even if it technically is a unsatisfied, non-simple property.
if (Object.class != pd.getPropertyType()) {
MethodParameter methodParam = BeanUtils.getWriteMethodParameter(pd);
// Do not allow eager init for type matching in case of a prioritized post-processor.
boolean eager = !PriorityOrdered.class.isInstance(bw.getWrappedInstance());
DependencyDescriptor desc = new AutowireByTypeDependencyDescriptor(methodParam, eager);
Object autowiredArgument = resolveDependency(desc, beanName, autowiredBeanNames, converter);
if (autowiredArgument != null) {
pvs.add(propertyName, autowiredArgument);
}
for (String autowiredBeanName : autowiredBeanNames) {
registerDependentBean(autowiredBeanName, beanName);
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Autowiring by type from bean name '" + beanName + "' via property '" +
propertyName + "' to bean named '" + autowiredBeanName + "'");
}
}
autowiredBeanNames.clear();
}
}catch (BeansException ex) {
throw new UnsatisfiedDependencyException(mbd.getResourceDescription(), beanName, propertyName, ex);
}
}
}
这上面的都是从功能上进行区分两种的不同之处,其两者在源码中的实现不同之处如下:
@Resource是由 CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor 这个类实现的,其既支持byName又支持byType的原因是Resource注解中含有两个属性:name(通过名称获取),type(通过类型获取),Spring处理@Resource的逻辑如下所示:
public ResourceElement(Member member, AnnotatedElement ae, @Nullable PropertyDescriptor pd) {
super(member, pd);
Resource resource = ae.getAnnotation(Resource.class);
String resourceName = resource.name();
Class<?> resourceType = resource.type();
this.isDefaultName = !StringUtils.hasLength(resourceName);
if (this.isDefaultName) {
resourceName = this.member.getName(); //得到name的值
if (this.member instanceof Method && resourceName.startsWith("set") && resourceName.length() > 3) {
resourceName = Introspector.decapitalize(resourceName.substring(3));
}
}
else if (embeddedValueResolver != null) {
resourceName = embeddedValueResolver.resolveStringValue(resourceName);
}
if (Object.class != resourceType) {
checkResourceType(resourceType);
}
else {
// No resource type specified... check field/method.
resourceType = getResourceType(); //得到其类型
}
this.name = (resourceName != null ? resourceName : "");
this.lookupType = resourceType;
String lookupValue = resource.lookup();
this.mappedName = (StringUtils.hasLength(lookupValue) ? lookupValue : resource.mappedName());
Lazy lazy = ae.getAnnotation(Lazy.class);
this.lazyLookup = (lazy != null && lazy.value());
}
@Autowired是由 AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor 这个类实现的