该博客讨论了如何利用完全背包策略解决POJ 1252 Euro Efficiency问题。题目要求用不超过6种面值的货币构造1到100的所有金额，同时最小化货币数量。博主提出了一种创新思路，将减法转换为加法，通过添加负值货币，将问题简化为正序和逆序的完全背包问题。通过这种方法避免了传统解法中需要进行两次遍历的复杂性。博主还提到了代码实现方案，包括使用BFS或完全背包，并提醒注意遍历范围的重要性。
Euro Efficiency
| Time Limit: 1000MS | Memory Limit: 10000K | |
| Total Submissions: 3950 | Accepted: 1697 |
Description
On January 1st 2002, The Netherlands, and several other European countries abandoned their national currency in favour of the Euro. This changed the ease of paying, and not just internationally.
A student buying a 68 guilder book before January 1st could pay for the book with one 50 guilder banknote and two 10 guilder banknotes, receiving two guilders in change. In short:50+10+10-1-1=68. Other ways of paying were: 50+25-5-1-1, or 100-25-5-1-1.Either way, there are always 5 units (banknotes or coins) involved in the payment process, and it
could not be done with less than 5 units.
Buying a 68 Euro book is easier these days: 50+20-2 = 68, so only 3 units are involved.This is no coincidence; in many other cases paying with euros is more efficient than paying with guilders. On average the Euro is more
A student buying a 68 guilder book before January 1st could pay for the book with one 50 guilder banknote and two 10 guilder banknotes, receiving two guilders in change. In short:50+10+10-1-1=68. Other ways of paying were: 50+25-5-1-1, or 100-25-5-1-1.Either way, there are always 5 units (banknotes or coins) involved in the payment process, and it
could not be done with less than 5 units.
Buying a 68 Euro book is easier these days: 50+20-2 = 68, so only 3 units are involved.This is no coincidence; in many other cases paying with euros is more efficient than paying with guilders. On average the Euro is more
最低0.47元/天 解锁文章
扫一扫
1037
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
