先总览实现逻辑:
@EnableTransactionManagement使用 @Import方式,注入TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector的Bean,相当于间接注入了以下两个bean
1、AutoProxyRegistrar
实现了ImportBeanDefinitionRegistrar接口,在registerBeanDefinitions方法中,将InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator注册名称为org.springframework.aop.config.internalAutoProxyCreator的bean。InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator实现了AbstractAutoProxyCreator的getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean方法,在其中将含有@Transactional的进行后置增强。
2、ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration(其间接注入了三个bean)
1)、TransactionAttributeSource(事务解析器)
其实现为AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource,用于解析我们在@Transactional中配置的属性信息
2)、TransactionInterceptor(事务方法拦截器)
注入TransactionInterceptor时依赖注入了TransactionAttributeSource,所以拥有解析@Transactional的能力;通过ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration实现的ImportAwear回调时导入了txManager,赋值给TransactionInterceptor。实现MethodInterceptor的invoke。根据优先级获取事务管理器、按照声明式事务和编程式事务(不进行分析了)进行处理。
创建事务(如果必要,根据配置解析判断)
try:执行事务增强的方法
catch:异常进行处理(如果必要进行回滚)
finally:清除事务信息
提交事务,组装返回信息
3)、BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor(事务增强器)
依赖注入了TransactionAttributeSource、TransactionInterceptor两个bean,实现了Aop的getAdvisor,将注入的TransactionInterceptor返回。
所以分为六个进行分析,顺序依次为:
TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector、
AutoProxyRegistrar、
ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration、
AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource、
TransactionInterceptor
BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor
一、 TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector分析
我们知道当在Spring的Bean上添加注解,就可以开启事务,并且只要在bean的类或者方法上添加@Transactional就可以添加事务。先看看@EnableTransactionManagement结构:
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Import(TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector.class)
public @interface EnableTransactionManagement {
boolean proxyTargetClass() default false;
AdviceMode mode() default AdviceMode.PROXY;
int order() default Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE;
}
1、将 TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector 注入为bean
2、有三个属性 (ImportSelector回调时使用)
proxyTargetClass: 是否代理当前的类 (cglib使用子类继承方式实现)
mode:使用Aop的代理方式,默认使用jdk动态代理
order:Intercepter的排序
@Import(TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector.class), 很明显使用@Import 将其注入容器中。结构如下:
public class TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector extends
AdviceModeImportSelector<EnableTransactionManagement> {
@Override
protected String[] selectImports(AdviceMode adviceMode) {
switch (adviceMode) {
case PROXY:
return new String[] {AutoProxyRegistrar.class.getName(),
ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration.class.getName()};
case ASPECTJ:
return new String[] {determineTransactionAspectClass()};
default:
return null;
}
}
private String determineTransactionAspectClass() {
return (ClassUtils.isPresent("javax.transaction.Transactional",
getClass().getClassLoader()) ?
TransactionManagementConfigUtils.JTA_TRANSACTION_ASPECT_CONFIGURATION_CLASS_NAME :
TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ASPECT_CONFIGURATION_CLASS_NAME);
}
}
又使用 ImportSelector的方式将返回的字符串类注入为Bean(想象可以参加:Spring源码-ImportSelector实现分析),到底注入什么,根据我们在启动类上注入的@EnableTransactionManagement的mode属性,在这里回传给我们进行判断。默认使用PROXY,即jdk的动态代理。则将会把 AutoProxyRegistrar 和 ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration注为bean。如果是ASPECTJ则需要判断类加载器是否加载了javax.transaction.Transactional,即是否使用jta方式(org.springframework.transaction.aspectj.AspectJJtaTransactionManagementConfiguration或org.springframework.transaction.aspectj.AspectJTransactionManagementConfiguration)。一般都很少配置属性,使用默认的jdk代理方式,所以基于该方式进行分析。
AutoProxyRegistrar用于注册一个自动代理创建者(APC)去发现可被代理的目标对象。
ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration结构比较复杂,如下:
@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)
public class ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration extends AbstractTransactionManagementConfiguration {
@Bean(name = TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ADVISOR_BEAN_NAME)
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor transactionAdvisor(
TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource,
TransactionInterceptor transactionInterceptor) {
BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor advisor = new BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor();
advisor.setTransactionAttributeSource(transactionAttributeSource);
advisor.setAdvice(transactionInterceptor);
if (this.enableTx != null) {
advisor.setOrder(this.enableTx.<Integer>getNumber("order"));
}
return advisor;
}
@Bean
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource() {
return new AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource();
}
@Bean
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public TransactionInterceptor transactionInterceptor(
TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource) {
TransactionInterceptor interceptor = new TransactionInterceptor();
interceptor.setTransactionAttributeSource(transactionAttributeSource);
if (this.txManager != null) {
interceptor.setTransactionManager(this.txManager);
}
return interceptor;
}
}
本类中注入了三个bean,基于依赖注入的原则,所以注册为BeanDefinition顺序为:TransactionAttributeSource、TransactionInterceptor和BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor。
二 、AutoProxyRegistrar分析
AutoProxyRegistrar实现了接口ImportBeanDefinitionRegistrar,其回调方法registerBeanDefinitions如下:
public void registerBeanDefinitions(AnnotationMetadata importingClassMetadata, BeanDefinitionRegistry registry) {
boolean candidateFound = false;
Set<String> annTypes = importingClassMetadata.getAnnotationTypes();
for (String annType : annTypes) {
AnnotationAttributes candidate = AnnotationConfigUtils.attributesFor(importingClassMetadata, annType);
if (candidate == null) {
continue;
}
Object mode = candidate.get("mode");
Object proxyTargetClass = candidate.get("proxyTargetClass");
if (mode != null && proxyTargetClass != null && AdviceMode.class == mode.getClass() &&
Boolean.class == proxyTargetClass.getClass()) {
candidateFound = true;
if (mode == AdviceMode.PROXY) {
AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(registry);
if ((Boolean) proxyTargetClass) {
AopConfigUtils.forceAutoProxyCreatorToUseClassProxying(registry);
return;
}
}
}
}
if (!candidateFound && logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
String name = getClass().getSimpleName();
logger.info(String.format("%s was imported but no annotations were found " +
"having both 'mode' and 'proxyTargetClass' attributes of type " +
"AdviceMode and boolean respectively. This means that auto proxy " +
"creator registration and configuration may not have occurred as " +
"intended, and components may not be proxied as expected. Check to " +
"ensure that %s has been @Import'ed on the same class where these " +
"annotations are declared; otherwise remove the import of %s " +
"altogether.", name, name, name));
}
}
获取所以的注解的类进行遍历,获取每一个注解的注解属性,如果获取到@EnableTransactionManagement上的mode和proxyTargetClass属性,判断如果是jdk代理类型,则执行方法:
AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(registry);
public static BeanDefinition registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(
BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, @Nullable Object source) {
return registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(
InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class, registry, source);
}
private static BeanDefinition registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(
Class<?> cls, BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, @Nullable Object source) {
Assert.notNull(registry, "BeanDefinitionRegistry must not be null");
if (registry.containsBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME)) {
BeanDefinition apcDefinition = registry.getBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME);
if (!cls.getName().equals(apcDefinition.getBeanClassName())) {
int currentPriority = findPriorityForClass(apcDefinition.getBeanClassName());
int requiredPriority = findPriorityForClass(cls);
if (currentPriority < requiredPriority) {
apcDefinition.setBeanClassName(cls.getName());
}
}
return null;
}
RootBeanDefinition beanDefinition = new RootBeanDefinition(cls);
beanDefinition.setSource(source);
beanDefinition.getPropertyValues().add("order", Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE);
beanDefinition.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE);
registry.registerBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME, beanDefinition);
return beanDefinition;
}
之前出入的source为null,cls为InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class。判断容器中是否注入名称为org.springframework.aop.config.internalAutoProxyCreator的bean,默认是没有。则或new一个RootBeanDefinition(cls),并且注册为该名称,即把InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator注册成一个bean。
后面判断,如果我们在@EnableTransactionMagagement上,配置为jdk,并且proxyTargetClass设置为true,则会在之前的RootBeanDefinition上添加属性:
definition.getPropertyValues().add("proxyTargetClass", Boolean.TRUE);
InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator
那么相当于所以要做的事都委派给InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator,其机构如下:
那么在每一个bean实例化的生命周期时都会回调该方法(postProcessAfterInitialization),继续追踪:
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(@Nullable Object bean, String beanName) {
if (bean != null) {
Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(bean.getClass(), beanName);
if (this.earlyProxyReferences.remove(cacheKey) != bean) {
return wrapIfNecessary(bean, beanName, cacheKey);
}
}
return bean;
}
每一个bean都先根据Class和bean的名称,在缓存中获取,否则创建并且放入缓存中。
protected Object wrapIfNecessary(Object bean, String beanName, Object cacheKey) {
if (StringUtils.hasLength(beanName) && this.targetSourcedBeans.contains(beanName)) {
return bean;
}
if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(this.advisedBeans.get(cacheKey))) {
return bean;
}
if (isInfrastructureClass(bean.getClass()) || shouldSkip(bean.getClass(), beanName)) {
this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
return bean;
}
// Create proxy if we have advice.
Object[] specificInterceptors = getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(bean.getClass(), beanName, null);
if (specificInterceptors != DO_NOT_PROXY) {
this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.TRUE);
Object proxy = createProxy(
bean.getClass(), beanName, specificInterceptors, new SingletonTargetSource(bean));
this.proxyTypes.put(cacheKey, proxy.getClass());
return proxy;
}
this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
return bean;
}
1、先获取该bean需要哪些代理
Object[] specificInterceptors = getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(bean.getClass(), beanName, null);
2、创建代理
Object proxy = createProxy(
bean.getClass(), beanName, specificInterceptors, new SingletonTargetSource(bean));
3、将代理对象放入缓存
this.proxyTypes.put(cacheKey, proxy.getClass());
二、AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource
TransactionInteceptor、BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor的bean初始化都有依赖了AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource,那么先解析其结构:
public class AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource extends
AbstractFallbackTransactionAttributeSource implements Serializable {
private static final boolean jta12Present;
private static final boolean ejb3Present;
static {
ClassLoader classLoader = AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource.class.getClassLoader();
jta12Present = ClassUtils.isPresent("javax.transaction.Transactional", classLoader);
ejb3Present = ClassUtils.isPresent("javax.ejb.TransactionAttribute", classLoader);
}
private final boolean publicMethodsOnly;
private final Set<TransactionAnnotationParser> annotationParsers;
public AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource() {
this(true);
}
public AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource(boolean publicMethodsOnly) {
this.publicMethodsOnly = publicMethodsOnly;
if (jta12Present || ejb3Present) {
this.annotationParsers = new LinkedHashSet<>(4);
this.annotationParsers.add(new SpringTransactionAnnotationParser());
if (jta12Present) {
this.annotationParsers.add(new JtaTransactionAnnotationParser());
}
if (ejb3Present) {
this.annotationParsers.add(new Ejb3TransactionAnnotationParser());
}
}
else {
this.annotationParsers = Collections.singleton(new SpringTransactionAnnotationParser());
}
}
}
使用无参数构造初始化,再调用了有参数构造,在静态代码块中根据类加载器判断是否加载了 jta和ejb,但是不管那种判断方式,都初始化了SpringTransactionAnnotationParser作为解析器。
实现了顶层接口的 getTransactionAttribute(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass),在父类AbstractFallbackTransactionAttributeSource中进行实现。就用于根据一个传入的Class和方法获取其@Transactional属性信息的功能。
public TransactionAttribute getTransactionAttribute(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) {
if (method.getDeclaringClass() == Object.class) {
return null;
}
// First, see if we have a cached value.
Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(method, targetClass);
TransactionAttribute cached = this.attributeCache.get(cacheKey);
if (cached != null) {
// Value will either be canonical value indicating there is no transaction attribute,
// or an actual transaction attribute.
if (cached == NULL_TRANSACTION_ATTRIBUTE) {
return null;
}
else {
return cached;
}
}
else {
// We need to work it out.
TransactionAttribute txAttr = computeTransactionAttribute(method, targetClass);
// Put it in the cache.
if (txAttr == null) {
this.attributeCache.put(cacheKey, NULL_TRANSACTION_ATTRIBUTE);
}
else {
String methodIdentification = ClassUtils.getQualifiedMethodName(method, targetClass);
if (txAttr instanceof DefaultTransactionAttribute) {
((DefaultTransactionAttribute) txAttr).setDescriptor(methodIdentification);
}
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Adding transactional method '" + methodIdentification + "' with attribute: " + txAttr);
}
this.attributeCache.put(cacheKey, txAttr);
}
return txAttr;
}
}
先判断缓存,否则进行解析再放入缓存。 TransactionAttribute txAttr = computeTransactionAttribute(method, targetClass);
@Nullable
protected TransactionAttribute computeTransactionAttribute(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) {
// Don't allow no-public methods as required.
if (allowPublicMethodsOnly() && !Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) {
return null;
}
// The method may be on an interface, but we need attributes from the target class.
// If the target class is null, the method will be unchanged.
Method specificMethod = AopUtils.getMostSpecificMethod(method, targetClass);
// First try is the method in the target class.
TransactionAttribute txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(specificMethod);
if (txAttr != null) {
return txAttr;
}
// Second try is the transaction attribute on the target class.
txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(specificMethod.getDeclaringClass());
if (txAttr != null && ClassUtils.isUserLevelMethod(method)) {
return txAttr;
}
if (specificMethod != method) {
// Fallback is to look at the original method.
txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(method);
if (txAttr != null) {
return txAttr;
}
// Last fallback is the class of the original method.
txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(method.getDeclaringClass());
if (txAttr != null && ClassUtils.isUserLevelMethod(method)) {
return txAttr;
}
}
return null;
}
判断类和方法是否存在,是否在接口上,则要获取真正的实现类等,考虑各种情况,真正的实现还是AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource自己处理。
protected TransactionAttribute findTransactionAttribute(Method method) {
return determineTransactionAttribute(method);
}
protected TransactionAttribute determineTransactionAttribute(AnnotatedElement element) {
for (TransactionAnnotationParser parser : this.annotationParsers) {
TransactionAttribute attr = parser.parseTransactionAnnotation(element);
if (attr != null) {
return attr;
}
}
return null;
}
遍历我们上面分析创建的所有解析器,进行解析,相当于委派模式。我们就查看SpringTransactionAnnotationParser解析就可以了。
public TransactionAttribute parseTransactionAnnotation(AnnotatedElement element) {
AnnotationAttributes attributes = AnnotatedElementUtils.findMergedAnnotationAttributes(
element, Transactional.class, false, false);
if (attributes != null) {
return parseTransactionAnnotation(attributes);
}
else {
return null;
}
}
根据传入的Method或者Class,按照注解@Transactional进行解析,再进行处理:
protected TransactionAttribute parseTransactionAnnotation(AnnotationAttributes attributes) {
RuleBasedTransactionAttribute rbta = new RuleBasedTransactionAttribute();
Propagation propagation = attributes.getEnum("propagation");
rbta.setPropagationBehavior(propagation.value());
Isolation isolation = attributes.getEnum("isolation");
rbta.setIsolationLevel(isolation.value());
rbta.setTimeout(attributes.getNumber("timeout").intValue());
rbta.setReadOnly(attributes.getBoolean("readOnly"));
rbta.setQualifier(attributes.getString("value"));
List<RollbackRuleAttribute> rollbackRules = new ArrayList<>();
for (Class<?> rbRule : attributes.getClassArray("rollbackFor")) {
rollbackRules.add(new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule));
}
for (String rbRule : attributes.getStringArray("rollbackForClassName")) {
rollbackRules.add(new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule));
}
for (Class<?> rbRule : attributes.getClassArray("noRollbackFor")) {
rollbackRules.add(new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule));
}
for (String rbRule : attributes.getStringArray("noRollbackForClassName")) {
rollbackRules.add(new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule));
}
rbta.setRollbackRules(rollbackRules);
return rbta;
}
终于看到了属性的,是否只读、事务隔离级别、事务边界、超时时间、回滚异常类等信息。封装返回,并进行缓存。
篇幅有限剩下的在 Spring源码-@EnableTransactionManagement方式事务实现分析(下)继续进行分析。