然后创建分页存储过程;这个是基于SQL 2005 的ROW_NUMBER的, SQL 2000 不适用; SQL 2008 我没有安装,所以也没有测试过!估计应该可以运行.
2种算法可以选择 1. 使用 BETWEEN ; 2. TOP ; 代码中已经注释了.
我测试了一下2种方法基本没有什么区别;代码如下:
03 | /****** 对象: StoredProcedure [dbo].[im531_Page] 脚本日期: 11/26/2010 10:52:35 ******/ |
06 | SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON |
16 | CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[im531_Page] |
17 | @TabeName AS NVARCHAR(50), |
18 | @Fields AS NVARCHAR(1024), |
19 | @SearchWhere AS NVARCHAR(1024), |
20 | @OrderFields AS NVARCHAR(1024), |
26 | DECLARE @sqlType AS TINYINT |
28 | DECLARE @sql AS NVARCHAR( MAX ) |
29 | IF @SearchWhere <> '' SET @SearchWhere = ' WHERE ' + @SearchWhere |
30 | IF @page < 2 SET @page = 1 |
33 | SET @sql = 'SELECT TOP ' + CONVERT (NVARCHAR(20),@pageNumber) + ' ' + @Fields |
34 | + 'FROM [' + @TabeName + '][a] WITH(NOLOCK) ' + @SearchWhere + ' ORDER BY ' + @OrderFields |
39 | SET @sql = ';WITH [Page_____Table] AS(' |
40 | + 'SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ' + @OrderFields + ') AS [RowNow],' + @Fields |
41 | + 'FROM [' + @TabeName + ' ][a] WITH(NOLOCK) ' + @SearchWhere |
47 | SET @sql = @sql + 'SELECT *' |
48 | + 'FROM [Page_____Table] WITH(NOLOCK)' |
49 | + 'WHERE [RowNow] BETWEEN ' + CONVERT (NVARCHAR(20),(@page - 1) * @pageNumber + 1) + ' AND ' + CONVERT (NVARCHAR(20),@page * @pageNumber) |
55 | SET @sql = @sql + 'SELECT TOP ' + CONVERT (NVARCHAR(20),@pageNumber) + ' *' |
56 | + 'FROM [Page_____Table] WITH(NOLOCK)' |
57 | + 'WHERE [RowNow] > ' + CONVERT (NVARCHAR(20),(@page - 1) * @pageNumber) |
然后测试分页性能;每页显示20条记录, 百万数据最大50000页,当前页采用随机数取值;
04 | DECLARE @M AS INT ; DECLARE @N AS INT ; DECLARE @cPage AS INT |
05 | SET @M = 50000; SET @N = 1 |
06 | SET @cPage = CAST ((rand()*(@M-@N)+@N) AS INT ) |
09 | @TabeName = 'Table_1' , |
11 | @SearchWhere = '[a] > 0' , |
12 | @OrderFields = '[a] DESC' , |
17 | SELECT [当前页] = @cPage,[分页执行耗时间(毫秒)] = DATEDIFF(ms,@d,GETDATE()) |
在我的机器上面测试均为毫秒级!!!!
园子里的高手若有更好的方法欢迎分享一下!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--------------------------------------- 我是华丽的分割线 ---------------------------------------
回复10楼园友 ★金★ :
加上数据统计结果后稍慢了一丁点儿,估计在实际运用中可以忽略不计;