3_8译码器与4_16译码器对比

实验要求：编写一个4－16的译码器，编译，和3－8译码器对比资源开销，看RTL View
3_8译码器（已知代码）

// module  decoder3_8, 4 input priority encoder with zero input check
module decoder3_8(
  IN        ,   // input  
  OUT       );  // output 

input [2:0] IN;
output[7:0] OUT;

reg   [7:0] OUT;
// get the OUT
always @ (IN)
 begin                                                       ，
  case(IN)
    3'b000: OUT = 8'b0000_0001;
    3'b001: OUT = 8'b0000_0010;
    3'b010: OUT = 8'b0000_0100;
    3'b011: OUT = 8'b0000_1000;
    3'b100: OUT = 8'b0001_0000;
    3'b101: OUT = 8'b0010_0000;
    3'b110: OUT = 8'b0100_0000;
    3'b111: OUT = 8'b1000_0000;
    //  full case 不需要写default，否则一定要有default
  endcase
end
endmodule

3_8译码器资源消耗图

3_8译码器RTL View

4_16译码器（仿写3_8译码器代码）

module decoder4_16(IN,OUT);  
input [3:0] IN;
output[15:0] OUT;
reg   [15:0] OUT;
always @ (IN) 
	begin
		case(IN)
		3'b0000: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_0000_0001;
		3'b0001: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_0000_0010;
		3'b0010: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_0000_0100;
		3'b0011: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_0000_1000;
		3'b0100: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_0001_0000;
		3'b0101: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_0010_0000;
		3'b0110: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_0100_0000;
		3'b0111: OUT = 8'b0000_0000_1000_0000;
		3'b1000: OUT = 8'b0000_0001_0000_0000;
		3'b1001: OUT = 8'b0000_0010_0000_0000;
		3'b1010: OUT = 8'b0000_0100_0000_0000;
		3'b1011: OUT = 8'b0000_1000_0000_0000;
		3'b1100: OUT = 8'b0001_0000_0000_0000;
		3'b1101: OUT = 8'b0010_0000_0000_0000;
		3'b0110: OUT = 8'b0100_0000_0000_0000;
		3'b0111: OUT = 8'b1000_0000_0000_0000;
											
  endcase
end
endmodule

4_16译码器资源消耗图

将两者的资源消耗图做对比会发现4-16译码器的资源消耗约是3-8译码器的2倍。
4_16译码器RTL View