自定义view的流程分为measure、 layout、draw三个主要步骤，今天我们通过源码来分下下measure的过程
我们从顶级view开始，顶级view即DecorView， view的事件都是先经过这个DecorView, 接下来我们来看看这个DecorView的MeasureSpec的创建过程：
进入ViewRootImpl中，查看measureHierarchy方法，有如下代码：
final DisplayMetrics packageMetrics = res.getDisplayMetrics();
res.getValue(com.android.internal.R.dimen.config_prefDialogWidth, mTmpValue, true);
int baseSize = 0;
if (mTmpValue.type == TypedValue.TYPE_DIMENSION) {
baseSize = (int)mTmpValue.getDimension(packageMetrics);
}
if (DEBUG_DIALOG) Log.v(mTag, "Window " + mView + ": baseSize=" + baseSize
+ ", desiredWindowWidth=" + desiredWindowWidth);
if (baseSize != 0 && desiredWindowWidth > baseSize) {
childWidthMeasureSpec = getRootMeasureSpec(baseSize, lp.width);
childHeightMeasureSpec = getRootMeasureSpec(desiredWindowHeight, lp.height);
performMeasure(childWidthMeasureSpec, childHeightMeasureSpec);这里只是截选一部分的源码， 我们看到这个baseSize， 其实就是屏幕的尺寸大小， 获取宽的MeasureSpc的方法：
childWidthMeasureSpec = getRootMeasureSpec(baseSize, lp.width);
这里传入的参数是屏幕尺寸以及DecorView自身的大小， 接着我们来看 getRootMeasureSpec方法：
private static int getRootMeasureSpec(int windowSize, int rootDimension) {
int measureSpec;
switch (rootDimension) {
case ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT:
// Window can't resize. Force root view to be windowSize.
measureSpec = MeasureSpec.makeMeasureSpec(windowSize, MeasureSpec.EXACTLY);
break;
case ViewGroup.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT:
// Window can resize. Set max size for root view.
measureSpec = MeasureSpec.makeMeasureSpec(windowSize, MeasureSpec.AT_MOST);
break;
default:
// Window wants to be an exact size. Force root view to be that size.
measureSpec = MeasureSpec.makeMeasureSpec(rootDimension, MeasureSpec.EXACTLY);
break;
}
return measureSpec;
}1.如果传入的view大小为math_parent，那么这个view的mode为EXACTLY， 大小为屏幕的尺寸.
2.如果传入的view大小为wrap_content，那么这个view的mode为AT_MOST,大小为屏幕的尺寸.
3.如果传入的view大小为一个具体的值，那么这个view的mode为EXACTLY，大小为view本身大小。
以上就是DecorView的MeaureSpec的整个创建的过程了。
看了顶级view之后我们来看普通的view， 普通的view的measure过程是由viewgroup传递过来的，接着我们来看看viewgroup的measureChildWithMargins方法：
protected void measureChildWithMargins(View child,
int parentWidthMeasureSpec, int widthUsed,
int parentHeightMeasureSpec, int heightUsed) {
final MarginLayoutParams lp = (MarginLayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams();
final int childWidthMeasureSpec = getChildMeasureSpec(parentWidthMeasureSpec,
mPaddingLeft + mPaddingRight + lp.leftMargin + lp.rightMargin
+ widthUsed, lp.width);
final int childHeightMeasureSpec = getChildMeasureSpec(parentHeightMeasureSpec,
mPaddingTop + mPaddingBottom + lp.topMargin + lp.bottomMargin
+ heightUsed, lp.height);
child.measure(childWidthMeasureSpec, childHeightMeasureSpec);
}这个方法获得了子view的MeasureSpec，并且将其传入子view的measure方法中， 这里重点来看下viewgroup是如何创建子view的MeasuerSpec的。来看getChildMeasureSpec方法内部的实现：
public static int getChildMeasureSpec(int spec, int padding, int childDimension) {
int specMode = MeasureSpec.getMode(spec);
int specSize = MeasureSpec.getSize(spec);
int size = Math.max(0, specSize - padding);
int resultSize = 0;
int resultMode = 0;
switch (specMode) {
// Parent has imposed an exact size on us
case MeasureSpec.EXACTLY:
if (childDimension >= 0) {
resultSize = childDimension;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT) {
// Child wants to be our size. So be it.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT) {
// Child wants to determine its own size. It can't be
// bigger than us.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.AT_MOST;
}
break;
// Parent has imposed a maximum size on us
case MeasureSpec.AT_MOST:
if (childDimension >= 0) {
// Child wants a specific size... so be it
resultSize = childDimension;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT) {
// Child wants to be our size, but our size is not fixed.
// Constrain child to not be bigger than us.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.AT_MOST;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT) {
// Child wants to determine its own size. It can't be
// bigger than us.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.AT_MOST;
}
break;
// Parent asked to see how big we want to be
case MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED:
if (childDimension >= 0) {
// Child wants a specific size... let him have it
resultSize = childDimension;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT) {
// Child wants to be our size... find out how big it should
// be
resultSize = View.sUseZeroUnspecifiedMeasureSpec ? 0 : size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT) {
// Child wants to determine its own size.... find out how
// big it should be
resultSize = View.sUseZeroUnspecifiedMeasureSpec ? 0 : size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED;
}
break;
}
//noinspection ResourceType
return MeasureSpec.makeMeasureSpec(resultSize, resultMode);
}这个方法很长，但是我们只需要注意到AT_MOST跟EXACTLY这两种情况就行，稍微分析下这个过程：
首先要理解这个方法的三个参数， 第一个是父view的MeasureSpec, 第二个是父view已占用的大小，第三个是view的LayoutParams的大小，如果不理解可以看看ViewGroup的MeasureChildWithMargins方法中的调用：
final int childWidthMeasureSpec = getChildMeasureSpec(parentWidthMeasureSpec,
mPaddingLeft + mPaddingRight + lp.leftMargin + lp.rightMargin
+ widthUsed, lp.width);第二个参数很长 ， mPaddingLeft + mPaddingRight + lp.leftMargin + lp.rightMargin + withUsed ，这些所有的值都有一个共同特点，就是这些位置是不能摆放任何view的，即父view已经占用的地盘，现在是不是对参数更加理解了呢。
接着我们回到getChildMeasureSpec方法中继续看看viewGroup到底是怎么创建view的MeasureSpec的。
第一步： 根据参数一，即传入的父view的MeasureSpec获得父view的Mode和Size。这里的第三行代码：
int size = Math.max(0, specSize - padding);
第二步：根据父view的Mode分情况处理， 到这一步我们应该就清楚为什么说view的大小是由父view的MeasureSpec与本身LayoutParmas大小共同决定的吧。
这里我们依然只看AT_MOST跟EXACTLY两种情况，
switch (specMode) {
// Parent has imposed an exact size on us
case MeasureSpec.EXACTLY:
if (childDimension >= 0) {
resultSize = childDimension;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT) {
// Child wants to be our size. So be it.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT) {
// Child wants to determine its own size. It can't be
// bigger than us.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.AT_MOST;
}
break;
// Parent has imposed a maximum size on us
case MeasureSpec.AT_MOST:
if (childDimension >= 0) {
// Child wants a specific size... so be it
resultSize = childDimension;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT) {
// Child wants to be our size, but our size is not fixed.
// Constrain child to not be bigger than us.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.AT_MOST;
} else if (childDimension == LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT) {
// Child wants to determine its own size. It can't be
// bigger than us.
resultSize = size;
resultMode = MeasureSpec.AT_MOST;
}
break;这里有个比较难以理解的值就是childDimension > 0 ， 这个其实就表示view的大小是一个具体的值比如100dp , 因为view的match_parent和 wrap_content在系统内部定义的都是负数，一个是-1. 一个是-2 ，所以判断childDimension > 0即，view的大小为一个具体的值。
接着就比较好理解了， 我们来稍微总结下：
无论父view是match_parent还是 wrap_content ，只要view是一个具体的值，view的Mode永远都是EXACTLY, 大小均是view本身定义的大小。
父view模式如果是EXACTLY, ---> 子view如果是mathch_parent ，那么子view的大小是父view的大小，模式也跟父view一样为EXACTLY. 子view如果是wrap_content， 大小还是父view的大小， 模式为AT_MOST
父view模式如果是AT_MOST , --- > 子view如果是math_parent， 那么子view大小为父view大小， 模式与父view一样都是AT_MOST, 子view如果是wrap_content， 子view大小为父view大小， 模式为AT_MOST
上面说的有点绕，但其实我们只需要记住一点， 无论上面那种情况，子view在wrap_content下，大小都是父view的大小， 到这里我们是不是就能理解为什么在自定义view的过程中如果不重写onMeasure， wrap_content是和match_parent是一个效果了吧。
以上过程是viewGroup中创建子view的MeasureSpec的过程， 有了这个MeasureSpec，测量子view大小就很简单了，我们可以看到在ViewGroup获取到子view的MeasureSpec之后，传入到子view的measure方法中：
child.measure(childWidthMeasureSpec, childHeightMeasureSpec);
不知不觉我们已经从viewgroup进入到了view的测量过程，
这里是不是突然意识到，ViewGroup根本没有测绘自己本身啊， 只是获取到子view的MeasureSpec然后传入子view的measure方法里去，这是因为ViewGroup是个抽象类，本身并没有定义测量的过程， ViewGroup的onMeasure需要各个子类去实现，比如LinearLayout 、 RelativeLayout等等，并且每个子类的测量过程都不一样，这个我们后面会讲， 现在我们还是接着看view的Measure过程。
上面说到viewgroup将创建的子view的MeasureSpec传入到了view的Measure方法中， 那么我们就来看看View的Measure方法：
public final void measure(int widthMeasureSpec, int heightMeasureSpec) {
boolean optical = isLayoutModeOptical(this);
if (optical != isLayoutModeOptical(mParent)) {
Insets insets = getOpticalInsets();
int oWidth = insets.left + insets.right;
int oHeight = insets.top + insets.bottom;
widthMeasureSpec = MeasureSpec.adjust(widthMeasureSpec, optical ? -oWidth : oWidth);
heightMeasureSpec = MeasureSpec.adjust(heightMeasureSpec, optical ? -oHeight : oHeight);
}
// Suppress sign extension for the low bytes
long key = (long) widthMeasureSpec << 32 | (long) heightMeasureSpec & 0xffffffffL;
if (mMeasureCache == null) mMeasureCache = new LongSparseLongArray(2);
final boolean forceLayout = (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT) == PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT;
// Optimize layout by avoiding an extra EXACTLY pass when the view is
// already measured as the correct size. In API 23 and below, this
// extra pass is required to make LinearLayout re-distribute weight.
final boolean specChanged = widthMeasureSpec != mOldWidthMeasureSpec
|| heightMeasureSpec != mOldHeightMeasureSpec;
final boolean isSpecExactly = MeasureSpec.getMode(widthMeasureSpec) == MeasureSpec.EXACTLY
&& MeasureSpec.getMode(heightMeasureSpec) == MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
final boolean matchesSpecSize = getMeasuredWidth() == MeasureSpec.getSize(widthMeasureSpec)
&& getMeasuredHeight() == MeasureSpec.getSize(heightMeasureSpec);
final boolean needsLayout = specChanged
&& (sAlwaysRemeasureExactly || !isSpecExactly || !matchesSpecSize);
if (forceLayout || needsLayout) {
// first clears the measured dimension flag
mPrivateFlags &= ~PFLAG_MEASURED_DIMENSION_SET;
resolveRtlPropertiesIfNeeded();
int cacheIndex = forceLayout ? -1 : mMeasureCache.indexOfKey(key);
if (cacheIndex < 0 || sIgnoreMeasureCache) {
// measure ourselves, this should set the measured dimension flag back
onMeasure(widthMeasureSpec, heightMeasureSpec);
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_MEASURE_NEEDED_BEFORE_LAYOUT;
} else {
long value = mMeasureCache.valueAt(cacheIndex);
// Casting a long to int drops the high 32 bits, no mask needed
setMeasuredDimensionRaw((int) (value >> 32), (int) value);
mPrivateFlags3 |= PFLAG3_MEASURE_NEEDED_BEFORE_LAYOUT;
}
// flag not set, setMeasuredDimension() was not invoked, we raise
// an exception to warn the developer
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_MEASURED_DIMENSION_SET) != PFLAG_MEASURED_DIMENSION_SET) {
throw new IllegalStateException("View with id " + getId() + ": "
+ getClass().getName() + "#onMeasure() did not set the"
+ " measured dimension by calling"
+ " setMeasuredDimension()");
}
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_LAYOUT_REQUIRED;
}
mOldWidthMeasureSpec = widthMeasureSpec;
mOldHeightMeasureSpec = heightMeasureSpec;
mMeasureCache.put(key, ((long) mMeasuredWidth) << 32 |
(long) mMeasuredHeight & 0xffffffffL); // suppress sign extension
}这个方法真是又臭又长。。。讲道理的话其实我也看不懂， 但是我们只需要注意到一点， 就是这个方法调用了OnMeasure方法！
也就是说measure --> OnMeasure
OnMeasure就简单了 ：
protected void onMeasure(int widthMeasureSpec, int heightMeasureSpec) {
setMeasuredDimension(getDefaultSize(getSuggestedMinimumWidth(), widthMeasureSpec),
getDefaultSize(getSuggestedMinimumHeight(), heightMeasureSpec));
}设置宽和高， 这个宽和高是在 getDefaultSize方法里返回的， 所以我们来看看getDefaultSize的具体代码：
public static int getDefaultSize(int size, int measureSpec) {
int result = size;
int specMode = MeasureSpec.getMode(measureSpec);
int specSize = MeasureSpec.getSize(measureSpec);
switch (specMode) {
case MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED:
result = size;
break;
case MeasureSpec.AT_MOST:
case MeasureSpec.EXACTLY:
result = specSize;
break;
}
return result;
}也就是说view的大小其实就是父view给他创建的MeasureSpec中的size大小。
这也进一步说明，view在wrap_content情况下 ，大小还是会跟父view大小一样， 所以我们需要在自定义view的时候重写OnMeasure。
扫一扫
461
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
