记录一次new与clone方法复制对象效率测试

最新推荐文章于 2022-01-09 00:00:00 发布

major_tom

最新推荐文章于 2022-01-09 00:00:00 发布

阅读量578

点赞数 1

分类专栏：学习

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/qq_36402372/article/details/87810774

版权

本文通过测试展示了在不同情况下，new与clone方法创建对象的效率，发现在某些场景下，clone方法的效率可能更高。由于现代编译器的优化，微基准测试可能会受到干扰。使用JMH进行性能测试，结果显示clone方法在特定条件下表现更优。

摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

测试clone和new方法的效率差别,首先来反面教材.

public class TestCloneAndNewMain {

public static void main(String[] args) throws CloneNotSupportedException {

    TestClone original = new TestClone("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9");
    long l1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    for (int i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
        newCopy(original);
    }
    long l2 = System.currentTimeMillis();

    long l3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    for (int i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
        original.clone();
    }
    long l4 = System.currentTimeMillis();

    System.out.println("new " + (l2 - l1));
    System.out.println("clone " + (l4 - l3));
}

public static TestClone newCopy(TestClone original) {
    TestClone testClone = new TestClone();
    testClone.setValue1(original.getValue1());
    testClone.setValue2(original.getValue2());
    testClone.setValue3(original.getValue3());
    testClone.setValue4(original.getValue4());
    testClone.setValue5(original.getValue5());
    testClone.setValue6(original.getValue6());
    testClone.setValue7(original.getValue7());
    testClone.setValue8(original.getValue8());
    testClone.setValue9(original.getValue9());
    return testClone;
}


static class TestClone implements Cloneable {

    private Integer i;

    private String value1;

    private String value2;

    private String value3;

    private String value4;

    private String value5;

    private String value6;
    private String value7;

    private String value8;

    private String value9;

    public TestClone() {
    }

    public TestClone(String value1, String value2, String value3, String value4, String value5, String value6, S