复制对象耗时比较（PO2Response）

---

前言

在开发过程中，经常会遇到将对象转为response返回出去，或着将request转PO，又或者将PO转为VO的场景。
下面就对比下：hutool，fastjson，jackson，jdk的效率

一、准备工作

1、导入依赖

jdk版本1.8

		<dependency>
            <groupId>org.projectlombok</groupId>
            <artifactId>lombok</artifactId>
            <optional>true</optional>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>com.alibaba</groupId>
            <artifactId>fastjson</artifactId>
            <version>1.2.79</version>
            <scope>compile</scope>
        </dependency>
        
        <dependency>
            <groupId>cn.hutool</groupId>
            <artifactId>hutool-all</artifactId>
            <version>5.8.6</version>
        </dependency>

        <dependency>
            <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
            <artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
        </dependency>

2、PO对象

@Data
public class ParentPO {
    private String name;

    private List<ChildPO> childList;

    private WifePO wife;

    public ParentPO() {
    }

    public ParentPO(String name, List<ChildPO> childList, WifePO wife) {
        this.name = name;
        this.childList = childList;
        this.wife = wife;
    }
}

@Data
public class ChildPO {
    private String name;

    public ChildPO(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }
}

@Data
public class WifePO {
    private String name;

    public WifePO(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }
}

3、 response对象

@Data
public class ParentResponse implements Serializable {
    private String name;

    private List<ChildResponse> childList;

    private WifeResponse wife;

    public ParentResponse() {
    }
}

@Data
public class ChildResponse implements Serializable {
    private String name;

    public ChildResponse() {
    }

    public ChildResponse(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }
}

@Data
public class WifeResponse implements Serializable {
    private String name;

    public WifeResponse() {
    }

    public WifeResponse(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }
}

二、比较代码

package com.example.demo.demo2;

import cn.hutool.core.bean.BeanUtil;
import com.alibaba.fastjson.JSONObject;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import org.python.google.common.collect.Lists;
import org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;


public class Demo2Controller {
    public static Integer CHILD_NUM = 2;

    public static ParentPO getParent() {
        List<ChildPO> childPOList = getChildList();
        return new ParentPO("张", childPOList, new WifePO("李"));
//                return new ParentPO("张", Lists.newArrayList(new ChildPO("1"),new ChildPO("2"),new ChildPO("3"),new ChildPO("4")), new WifePO("李"));

    }

    private static List<ChildPO> getChildList() {
        List<ChildPO> childPOList = new ArrayList<>();
        while (CHILD_NUM > 0) {
            childPOList.add(new ChildPO("" + CHILD_NUM--));
        }
        return childPOList;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        Long start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        ParentPO p1 = getParent();
        Long end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("创建parent耗时 = " + (end1 - start1));
        System.out.println("创建parent =               " + JSONObject.toJSONString(p1));

        Long start2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        ParentResponse p2 = BeanUtil.toBean(p1, ParentResponse.class);
        Long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("hutool赋值到Parent2耗时 = " + (end2 - start2));
        System.out.println("hutool赋值到Parent2 =      " + JSONObject.toJSONString(p2));

        Long start3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        ParentResponse p3 = JSONObject.parseObject(JSONObject.toJSONString(p1), ParentResponse.class);
        Long end3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("fastjson赋值到Parent2耗时 = " + (end3 - start3));
        System.out.println("fastjson赋值到Parent2 =    " + JSONObject.toJSONString(p3));

        Long start4 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
        ParentResponse p4 = mapper.readValue(mapper.writeValueAsString(p2), ParentResponse.class);
        Long end4 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("jackson赋值到Parent2耗时 = " + (end4 - start4));
        System.out.println("jackson赋值到Parent2 =     " + JSONObject.toJSONString(p4));

        Long start5 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        ParentResponse p5 = BeanUtil.toBean(p1, ParentResponse.class);
        BeanUtils.copyProperties(p1, p5);
        Long end5 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("jdk赋值到Parent2耗时 = " + (end5 - start5));
        System.out.println("jdk赋值到Parent2 =         " + JSONObject.toJSONString(p5));
    }
}

用CHILD_NUM控制parent对象的大小（parent有N个child）

当CHILD_NUM = 5时，执行结果如下：

创建parent耗时 = 2
hutool赋值到Parent2耗时 = 139
fastjson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 127
jackson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 235
jdk赋值到Parent2耗时 = 105

当CHILD_NUM = 50时，执行结果如下：

创建parent耗时 = 1
hutool赋值到Parent2耗时 = 171
fastjson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 125
jackson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 238
jdk赋值到Parent2耗时 = 141

当CHILD_NUM = 500时，执行结果如下：

创建parent耗时 = 3
hutool赋值到Parent2耗时 = 274
fastjson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 117
jackson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 222
jdk赋值到Parent2耗时 = 178

当CHILD_NUM =5000时，执行结果如下：

创建parent耗时 = 8
hutool赋值到Parent2耗时 = 738
fastjson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 158
jackson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 269
jdk赋值到Parent2耗时 = 547

当CHILD_NUM = 50000时，执行结果如下：

创建parent耗时 = 30
hutool赋值到Parent2耗时 = 4785
fastjson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 187
jackson赋值到Parent2耗时 = 285
jdk赋值到Parent2耗时 = 3997

总结

从结果上来看，综合选择fastjson，效率是比较高的。

hutool速度为啥那么慢呢，从方法上看，是因为使用了反射（反射技术速度慢）

public static <T> T toBean(Object source, Class<T> clazz, CopyOptions options) {
        return toBean(source, () -> {
            return ReflectUtil.newInstanceIfPossible(clazz);
        }, options);
    }

jdk也是内部使用了反射，所以速度慢
这个方法内使用反射实现copy

org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils#copyProperties(java.lang.Object, java.lang.Object, java.lang.Class<?>, java.lang.String...)

fastjson快的原因：继承JSON，本质上是转为Map

jackson不知道（代码没看懂）