一、前言
出于对遍历方式的耗时想法,是普通for循环、fori、foreach、迭代器 iterator、还是steam流的形式哪种耗时更少呢?
首先添加一个List 集合,这边采用ArraryList
ArrayList<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
list.add(i);
}
下面是几种方式
1.1、普通for循环
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
int a = 0;
a += list.get(i);
}
System.out.println("耗时:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime));
1.2 增强for循环
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (Integer itr : list) {
int a = 0;
a += itr;
}
System.out.println("增强for耗时:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime));
1.3 迭代器
long startTime3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
Iterator<Integer> iterator = list.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
int xx=0;
Integer next = iterator.next();
xx += next;
}
System.out.println("迭代器耗时:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime3));
1.4 forEach
long startTime4 = System.currentTimeMillis();
list.forEach(integer -> {
int xx=0;
xx += integer;
});
System.out.println("foreach耗时:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime4));
1.5 stream流
long startTime5 = System.currentTimeMillis();
list.stream().forEach(integer -> {
int xx=0;
xx += integer;
});
System.out.println("stream流耗时:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime5));
一千万数据在耗时情况如下:
可以看到普通for循环时间更少。