1.JUC包各大线程池的对比:
1.1SingleThreadExecutor
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class SingleThreadPoolTest {
public static volatile int sum=0;
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
//串行化执行任务
ExecutorService executorService5 = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
for( int i=0;i<100;i++){
executorService5.execute(()->{
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+":"+sum++);
});
}
}
}
1.2 CachedThreadPool
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class CachePoolTest {
public static volatile int sum=0;
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ExecutorService executorService5 = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
for( int i=0;i<100;i++){
executorService5.execute(()->{
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+":"+sum++);
});
}
}
}
1.3 FixedThreadPool
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class FixedThreadPoolTest {
public static volatile int sum=0;
public static void main(String[] args) {
ExecutorService executorService5 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3);
for( int i=0;i<100;i++){
executorService5.execute(()->{
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+":"+sum++);
});
}
}
}
1.4 SingleThreadScheduledExecutor
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
public class ScheduledPoolTest {
public static volatile int sum = 0;
public static void main(String[] args) {
ScheduledExecutorService executorService5 = Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor();
executorService5.scheduleWithFixedDelay(
() -> {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ":" + sum++);
}, 0, 1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
}
}
1.5 WorkStealingPool
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class WorkStealingPoolTest {
public static volatile int sum=0;
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ExecutorService executorService5 = Executors.newWorkStealingPool(8);
for( int i=0;i<100;i++){
executorService5.execute(()->{
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+":"+sum++);
});
}
}
}
2.手动创建线程池
建议手动创建线程池,更灵活
import java.util.concurrent.*;
public class ThreadPoolTest {
public static volatile int version = 0;
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ExecutorService executorService = new ThreadPoolExecutor(2, 10, 60, TimeUnit.SECONDS, new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(100));
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
executorService.execute(() -> {//阻塞队列设置小一点,可以达到被拒绝的效果;默认是阻塞队列满且线程达到最大数时,有新的请求进来,直接拒绝
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ":" + version++);
});
}
}
}
2.1 corePoolSize
表示线程池核心线程数,当初始化线程池时,会创建核心线程进入等待状态,即使它是空闲的,核心线程也不会被摧毁,从而降低了任务一来时要创建新线程的时间和性能开销。
2.2 maximumPoolSize
表示最大线程数,大于最大线程数的任务只能进入阻塞队列进行排队等候,直到有线程空闲了,才能继续执行任务。
2.3 keepAliveTime
除了核心线程外,那些被新创建出来的线程空闲状态可以存活多久.0表示不销毁。
2.4 unit
存活时间单位。
2.5 workQueue
表示任务的阻塞队列。
3 注意
1.引用的是默认的拒绝策略,当线程数达到最大数量,任务队列已满,直接拒绝新的请求。
2. corePoolSize < 线程数 <maximumPoolSize ,新的请求优先放入队列。
3. shutDown()停止接收新的submit的任务,已提交的任务(正在运行和队列中的),会继续执行。
4. shutDownNow()停止接收新的submit的任务,忽略队列里正在等待的任务,尝试将正在执行的任务打断;返回未执行的队列列表。