实验题目:
子网划分如下:
192.168.1.0/26(area0)
192.168.1.0/29
192.168.1.8/29(R1环)
192.168.1.16/29(R2环)
192.168.1.32/29(R3环)
192.168.1.40/29(备)
192.168.1.48/29(备)
192.168.1.56/29(备)
192.168.1.64/29(备)
192.168.1.64/26(area1)
192.168.1.64/30
192.168.1.68/30(备)
192.168.1.128/26(备)
192.168.1.192/26(备)
详细拓扑(如下图):
基配:
R1
R2
R3
R4
宣告:
R1
R2
R3(且将区域0汇总)
R4(且R4中缺省不可宣告,故做缺省路由)
将AR3设置为DR,又因无BDR,故将AR1和AR2优先级设为0,以放弃DR/BDR选举:
查看邻居表(以R1为例,若无相关邻居,则邻居已达死亡时间,需重配):
接口认证(均认证,以R3为例):
避环,在ABR上设置空接口: [R3]IP route-static 192.168.1.0 26 NULL 0
测试(失败):
分析原因:配置宣告时间过长,导致4.4.4.4达死亡时间,不再建立邻居关系
正常测试结果:
[r1]ping 4.4.4.1
PING 4.4.4.1: 56 data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
Reply from 4.4.4.1: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=254 time=50 ms
Reply from 4.4.4.1: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=254 time=70 ms
Reply from 4.4.4.1: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=254 time=40 ms
Reply from 4.4.4.1: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=254 time=40 ms
Reply from 4.4.4.1: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=254 time=50 ms
--- 4.4.4.1 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 40/50/70 ms