从nova/conductor/__init__.py中可以看到conductor最终定义了四种class
CONF = nova.conf.CONF
def API(*args, **kwargs):
use_local = kwargs.pop('use_local', False)
if CONF.conductor.use_local or use_local:
api = conductor_api.LocalAPI
else:
api = conductor_api.API
return api(*args, **kwargs)
def ComputeTaskAPI(*args, **kwargs):
use_local = kwargs.pop('use_local', False)
if CONF.conductor.use_local or use_local:
api = conductor_api.LocalComputeTaskAPI
else:
api = conductor_api.ComputeTaskAPI
return api(*args, **kwargs)
这四种class可以分成两对,conductor_api.LocalAPI/conductor_api.API 和 conductor_api.LocalComputeTaskAPI/conductor_api.ComputeTaskAPI.
每对中具体用那个API是通过CONF.conductor.use_local 和 use_local是否为true来决定的,目前看use_local默认是false。所以只由CONF.conductor.use_local来控制
这里以conductor_api.LocalAPI/conductor_api.API为例来说明每对中两个API的区别。这两个的定义在nova/conductor/api.py中。只要关注这两个class的__init__ 函数就可以看出区别
class LocalAPI(object):
"""A local version of the conductor API that does database updates
locally instead of via RPC.
"""
def __init__(self):
# TODO(danms): This needs to be something more generic for
# other/future users of this sort of functionality.
self._manager = utils.ExceptionHelper(manager.ConductorManager())
class API(LocalAPI):
"""Conductor API that does updates via RPC to the ConductorManager."""
def __init__(self):
self._manager = rpcapi.ConductorAPI()
self.base_rpcapi = baserpc.BaseAPI(topic=CONF.conductor.topic)
这里可以看到在API这个class中定义的manager是rpcapi.ConductorAPI(),而LocalAPI中却没有定义。
原来这两个API的区别就是能否进行rpc通信呀
LocalAPI和API的区别
最新推荐文章于 2024-05-23 15:52:27 发布