英语作文人工智能免费在线批改打分 无需注册 微软小英作文打分 托福 雅思 高中作文 GRE

这篇文章主要是改打分系统的评测。托福雅思高考等https://app.mtutor.engkoo.com/englishwriting/，gre见最下面。

另外人工智能的意思是，微软小英会根据你的文章内容帮你改作文，比如他能补全你缺少的相关名词。

目录

先展示下评分功能：它可以从四个方面给出接近托福的打分。

比如，题目是：

多种考试类型可以选择：

如果修改后再要求打分：

主要特点：

如果chrome显示打分失败换别的浏览器比如edge，我就出现了这个问题

 

人工外教批改

GRE

GRE方法

总结

---

 

 

---

---

 

---

先展示下评分功能：它可以从四个方面给出接近托福的打分。

比如，题目是：

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

 

多种考试类型可以选择：

如果修改后再要求打分：

主要特点：

1.打分很快

2.能够识别拼写错误

3.能够识别语法错误，包括动名词等，以及一些比较高级的语法错误

4.能够自动修正

5.感觉对于高级词意理解可能不是那么合适，他不会告诉你哪个单词用的不恰当，所以建议配合谷歌翻译使用。

如果chrome显示打分失败换别的浏览器比如edge，我就出现了这个问题

 

人工外教批改

然后吧，这个30分作文我用了同桌英语的vip批改，给了我3分档（0-5），相当于托福的20分（0-30）.

 

然后评语是：

3分对应的：

　　♦可能因完全曲解写作任务而未能根据写作任务行文

　　♦所表达的观点有限，可能大部分并不相关或重复

　　♦不能有逻辑地组织观点

　　♦所用衔接手段有时非常有限，且有时未能体现观点之间的逻辑性

　　♦ 只使用非常有限的词汇及表达方式，对构词及/或拼写掌握也非常有限

　　♦ 错误可能严重地影响信息的传达

　　♦ 尝试造句，但语法及标点符号错误占多数，意思被扭曲

感觉是说少了结尾段，我个人不喜欢写结尾，觉得废话，开头我个人也不喜欢重复题目，觉得废话。哈哈。写作习惯看来不适合考试。每个段的结尾也要重复一边结论，就感觉很不实际，凑字数一样。模板意味很重。看来考试有考试的套路。

另外就是论点，他认为不够充分，我个人也不喜欢举例我堂弟，我同学，我朋友等。比较喜欢推逻辑。

不能偏听偏信，不过也要吸取别人的建议。写一篇模板比较保险。

 

30分/3分原文：

I disagree with the opinion that all college students should take history classes for a few reasons.

First, college students major subject is already stressful, especially with goals of a straight A. They have to go to classes on time and finish all of their homework assignments. To impress the professors they also need to preview a lot of materials relevant or not to the classes. For example, my major is computer science and we have code missions, but sometimes the bug will take days to be corrected. If there are irrelevant subjects such as history to give us additional burdens, our college life will be really tough.

In addition to the stressful study, enthusiasm is another reason that students in other fields should not learn history.  They did not chose history as their major at first , it might be that they are not interested in history, and some might hate it. Forcing students in history , as history needs passions to remember, might lead to a backfire situation  easily, hence the more school wants them learn the less they will remember. Consequently, they might fail and have to learn it again.

So is it harmful to your life knowing nothing about history? Absolutely not. Because different countries have different histories. It is normal to know nothing about the history of a country. For example, nowadays people move and immigration a lot, and for them general knowledge of a country is enough. So why bother to learn history, if you do not need it. 

Last but not least, we can consider this learning problem from teachers' and school's perspectives as well. All the students taking history classes will certainly requires more teachers. So the school would rather have teachers in class longer than before or hire more history teachers. The first option will consume too much energy from teachers, which is responsible for the low effects in classes and limited research from professors. And the second one will spend teaching funds on a program which nobody likes, generate zero benefit and undermine research.

 

 

同桌英语改后：放图片主要是因为能够看的很清楚加了主要的是一些总结句。实际上内容是不给你改的，大概还是需要自己琢磨怎么丰富细节。不过在通过人工智能修改后，大部分的语法错误，都没了。

 

有一段外教以为我用的使转折，实际上使递进，就很尴尬，看来写的应该更加直白一些。

 

GRE

gre有官方的打分项目，不过两篇文章20大洋，美刀。相当于一篇80人民币。怕了怕了。

所以这里放一个在线人工智能打分的项目。https://www.mbacrystalball.com/gre/gre-essay-grader 

也是自然语言处理处理的。

可以先通过小英修改，然后再用评分系统进行打分。

我测试了一篇满分范文，得到了5.7的分数，看来这个系统其实是比较保守的。所以我得了5.8是不是说明溢出了。开个玩笑，初期写作花了1小时认真写，又花了两个小时各种改，才得到这个分数，还是要认真的练习。

比如下面这篇文章，我就是同过各种人工智能方式改的语法错误，最后再用人工智能评分，吃土，

The data generate an argument that the less homework makes Marlee students achieve more grades in math and science than Sanlee where students get more homework. But the conclusion is based on three wrong premises : First, the students may be too lazy to finish the works which are accordingly not responsible for the bad scores. Second, the school can set different test and graduation standards so the grades are not actually comparability. Third, the frequency does not equal to the quality and quantity with regard to homework thus students in Marlee may need to spend more time and energy on their difficult task. 

To begin with, the argument based on a unwarranted premise that the students will review all the knowledge from homeworks industriously, which contains finishing all of them timely, correcting them with the answers as soon as they finish and reviewing the wrong one frequently. But if the students just ignore most of their homework, it will be default. For example, my father is a clever man, but he did not make it to college. Also, he always reminds me to treat study seriously. Turns out he used his intelligence to escape every work and class in high school. As the consequence showed by my father,  if the homework are not done, laziness might be the chief culprit of low scores.  

Additionally, the argument supposes that schools in two districts use the same test and graduation standards, so the same scores mean students in Marlee are outdo those in Marlee. But it is normal that good schools set difficult quizzes so that their students can compete with each other and detect the weakness through the incorrect ones. For them, all students get full marks when test in other schools. For example, Tsinghua is the top university in China, and I took their entrance exam before. I was not surprised that everything in it reached the highest difficulty that I have ever seen. On the contrary , after I had failed the test in Tsinghua and taken another one in other schools, I got high marks easily. So do the different effects of various graduation standard. In one word, the score does not reflect the ability of students unless they take the same exam and those in Sanlee may have higher scores if they take the tests of Marlee.  

Last but not least, the argument seems to take  the frequency of homework as the workload. A few days a week is truly less than everyday, but if the task for a few days is complicate and consist of several small parts then the students in Marlee actually finish more workloads on study to get good score. For example, college students usually get homework once a week, but it doesn't mean that they have a easy work, because their essay task contains lots of time of searching material, thinking and discussion, and entity homework like computer code will take time to code and debug.  As for the quantity, some teachers will even set homework for a month so the students can preview and finish them before classes, then they can understand better. So the homework with low frequency but high difficulty and quantity cast the positive affection on scores in Marlee.

  As I mentioned above, the three premise is untenable thus the logic that the less homework in Marlee get higher marks than those in Sanlee is questionable.

GRE方法

我通过小英进行改错，通过谷歌翻译将文章英译中，然后更改奇怪的语义不通的地方。最后使用下面的进行判分。

总结

就计算机科学角度来讲，如果官方已经实现了机器打分，那么非官方的机器打分有80%的可信赖程度，因为代码以及方法大半都是公开的，计算机比较讲究开源。唯一可能导致打分不那么准确的原因使数据库的差异，但是这个差异根据一般论文来看，准确率会有最多5%的变动，一般都是2%。

 

人工批改显然有更多的细节在内容上，因为人工智能并没有审题，也不会考虑内容的相识，直白，人性化。也没有要求你的模板。所以可以在初期使用人工智能以及写作模板达到一个较好的分数，如果想要高分满分，显然是需要购买一定的人工批改的。这并非恰饭，我还没这本事，sad。