vue 所见即所得开发_所见即所得的价格将使开发人员失业

vue 所见即所得开发

Wix, Squarespace, Shopify — if you’ve ever watched some sort of tech-related video on YouTube, you would have heard these names in some form. They stalk you through various ad formats, trying to rope you with promises of being ‘code-free’, ‘easy’, ‘revolutionary’, and ‘most advanced platform’ in web development.

Wix，Squarespace和Shopify-如果您曾经在YouTube上观看过某种与技术相关的视频，那么您会以某种形式听到这些名字。 他们会通过各种广告格式跟踪您，试图用网络开发中的“无代码”，“简单”，“革命性”和“最先进的平台”来吸引您。

But as developers, we know better.

但是作为开发人员，我们了解得更多。

Over the years, I’ve tried my best to block these ads, but to no avail. Over the years, I’ve also had people ask me why I still bother to code if there’s Wix, Shopify, and Squarespace — which feels like a slap in the face.

多年以来，我尽力阻止这些广告，但无济于事。 多年以来，我也有很多人问我，为什么还有Wix，Shopify和Squarespace仍然要打扰我，为什么还要打扰呢？

In the past decade, code has become commoditized and cheap, creating large gaps in making a living wage and what the average Joe is now willing to pay. This creates a unique problem for freelance developers — how do you entice clients to spend when there’s an advertisement that bombards anyone thinking about getting a website at every turn?

在过去的十年中，代码已变得商品化和便宜化，在赚取生活工资和乔现在平均愿意支付的工资方面造成了巨大差距。 这为自由开发人员带来了一个独特的问题-当广告广告轰炸任何想转动网站的人时，您如何吸引客户花钱？

什么是Wix，Shopify和Squarespace实际上是 (What Wix, Shopify, and Squarespace actually are)

For non-developers, Wix, Shopify, Squarespace, and these sites promise grand designs and outcomes for the low, low, price of less than $20 a month. However, if we take a step back and look at them for what they are, these sites are essentially WYSIWYG site builders.

对于非开发人员而言，Wix，Shopify，Squarespace和这些网站承诺以每月不到20美元的低，低价格实现出色的设计和成果。 但是，如果我们退后一步看一下它们的含义，那么这些站点实质上就是所见即所得的站点构建器。

But are they really revolutionary?

但是它们真的具有革命性吗？

In their own special way — yes.

以他们自己的特殊方式-是的。

If we look back to the early 2000s, creating a site on the Internet was mostly inaccessible to people. Only the extremely tech-savvy and curious person could boot up something after a long process of trial, error, and learning. Information wasn’t as readily available and before 2005, YouTube wasn’t even a thing.

如果回头看2000年代初期，人们几乎无法在Internet上创建站点。 经过长时间的尝试，错误和学习后，只有非常精通技术和好奇的人才能启动某些东西。 信息不那么容易获得，在2005年之前，YouTube甚至都不是一回事。

The Internet existed but not as the massively accessible resource hub that we’ve become accustomed to.

互联网的存在，但并不像我们已经习惯的那样，可大规模访问的资源中心。

When people wanted a website, they needed to rely on people who were interested in the field. For most business owners, they’re in the business of running their business and not spending hours tinkering around, setting up hosting, and whatever else is involved. This is something that is still relevant today — and what these ‘revolutionary’ sites offer to solve.

当人们想要一个网站时，他们需要依靠对该领域感兴趣的人们。 对于大多数企业主来说，他们是在经营自己的企业，而不是花费大量时间进行修补，设置主机以及其他任何事情。 这是今天仍然有意义的东西，以及这些“革命性”网站可以解决的问题。

Wix, Weebly, and Squarespace like sites are hosted platforms that gives business owners a much cheaper alternative to hiring a developer. Not everyone needs a customized application with unique features. Sometimes, the coffee shop down the road just wants something that looks nice and within a particular budget. Sometimes, a business just wants a digital billboard and nothing else.

Wix，Weebly和Squarespace等网站都是托管平台，为企业所有者提供了比雇用开发人员便宜得多的选择。 并非每个人都需要具有独特功能的定制应用程序。 有时，路边的咖啡店只想要看起来不错且在特定预算内的东西。 有时，企业只想要一个数字广告牌，而没有其他东西。

These sites are revolutionary in the sense that it gives non-enterprise business owners and entrepreneurs digital tools to do the basics of what they need to do. It also gives designers a platform to sell their skills on a digital medium.

这些站点具有革命性意义，因为它为非企业所有者和企业家提供了数字工具，使其可以做他们需要做的基础工作。 它还为设计师提供了一个在数字媒体上出售其技能的平台。

But are they revolutionary from a coding perspective? The quick and clear answer to this is a definite no.

但是从编码角度来看，它们是否具有革命性？ 快速而明确的答案是肯定的。

开发工作状态 (The state of dev work)

The way we code has evolved dramatically. As we become accustomed to commercial patterns like cart processes, blogs, subscriptions, and payment collection, we learn to craft reusable patterns that are modular and transferrable. This makes it easily accessible to other developers. WYSIWYG platform sites have merely figured out how to commoditize this in a format that’s accessible to the general public.

我们的编码方式已经发生了巨大的变化。 随着我们习惯于购物车流程，博客，订阅和付款收集等商业模式，我们学会了构建模块化且可转移的可重用模式。 这使得其他开发人员可以轻松访问它。 所见即所得平台站点仅想出了如何以一种公众可以访问的格式将其商品化。

So where does this leave us as developers?

那么，这将使我们成为开发人员又将何去何从？

There are two options — custom solutions for businesses that can afford to hire, or indie entrepreneurs bootstrapping several disciplines together.

有两种选择-适用于有能力聘请企业的自定义解决方案，或独立的企业家将多个学科结合在一起。

The business custom solution is an obvious path for many. In a way, it can be seen as the default path. It’s basically the process of getting a job. It’s steady. It’s sort of secure. The compensations are predictable.

对于许多人来说，业务定制解决方案是一条显而易见的道路。 在某种程度上，它可以看作是默认路径。 这基本上是找到工作的过程。 很稳定 这是安全的。 补偿是可以预见的。

The tech indie/entrepreneur is a bit different. The path itself is not suitable for everyone and requires more work and skills beyond just knowing how to code, making the developer unique through the myriad of experiences they’ve accumulated.

技术独立/企业家有点不同。 路径本身并不适合所有人，并且需要更多的工作和技能，而不仅仅是知道如何编码，这使开发人员通过他们积累的无数经验而与众不同。

Both tracks — salary and indie/entrepreneur — do the same thing: they both solve a problem. The major difference is who they’re solving that problem for. The salary dev track means that you’re solving problems for someone else, in exchange for compensation from a single source. That compensation is often big enough to cover your general cost of living and maybe some more.

薪资和独立/企业家这两个轨迹都做同样的事情：它们都解决了问题。 主要区别在于他们为谁解决此问题。 薪资开发轨道意味着您正在为别人解决问题，以换取一个来源的报酬。 该补偿金通常足够支付您的一般生活费用，甚至更多。

The indie/entrepreneur dev solves a problem that may be personal or experienced by the general wider community. They are compensated on a smaller scale, but the number of people compensating is often more than one. The main issue that indie/entrepreneur devs face is not getting enough people. In order to attract a higher number of patronage, other factors of running a business begin to come into play — marketing, networking, tribe building, and branding are some of them. At this point, the developer is more than just a developer — they are a small business that’s managed to cut the cost of hiring a developer.

独立/企业家开发人员解决的问题可能是个人问题，也可能是广大社区所遇到的问题。 他们得到的补偿规模较小，但被补偿的人数通常不止一个。 独立/企业家开发者面临的主要问题是没有足够的人。 为了吸引更多的光顾，经营企业的其他因素也开始发挥作用-其中包括营销，网络，部落建设和品牌塑造。 在这一点上，开发人员不仅仅是一个开发人员-他们是一家小型企业，设法削减了雇用开发人员的成本。

最后的想法 (Final thoughts)

The salary track of custom creations for businesses is not a bad default option. As developers, we often pick up business patterns from others in our code creation process. These business patterns are often transferrable as solutions to potential problems we may identify in the future. We also tend to pick up coding patterns and knowledge from others within the teams we work with.

企业自定义创建的薪资跟踪不是一个坏的默认选项。 作为开发人员，我们经常在代码创建过程中从其他人那里挑选业务模式。 这些业务模式通常可以作为解决我们将来可能发现的潜在问题的解决方案。 我们也倾向于从与我们合作的团队中的其他人那里获取编码模式和知识。

However, some of us may end up going down the indie/entrepreneur dev track, sometimes bypassing the salary path completely. This is a growing trend among many new developers, where code becomes a tool to help achieve a particular goal.

但是，我们中的某些人最终可能会跌入独立/企业家开发的轨道，有时甚至会完全绕开薪水之路。 在许多新开发人员中，这是一种日益增长的趋势，其中代码成为帮助实现特定目标的工具。

At the end of the day, code is a tool — no matter how we want to put it. Our job determines how and who we use this tool for. WYSIWYG is also a tool, with a bulk part of the code completed for you by other developers.

归根结底，代码是一种工具，无论我们想如何使用它。 我们的工作决定了如何使用此工具以及将其用于谁。 所见即所得也是一种工具，其他开发人员可以为您完成大部分代码。

Whatever we end up doing and whatever track we take, WYSIWYG platforms won’t price us out of our jobs. Rather, it just gives us another tool to work with. These WYSIWYG platforms often have a code layer, in addition to the non-code interfaces, they offer to their target market. Some WYSIWYG platforms are better than others at this, especially when it comes to extensibility.

无论我们最终做什么，无论走什么路，所见即所得平台都不会使我们失去工作。 相反，它只是为我们提供了另一个工具。 这些WYSIWYG平台通常具有代码层，除了非代码接口外，它们还提供给目标市场。 某些WYSIWYG平台在这方面要优于其他平台，尤其是在可扩展性方面。

As developers, there’s no shame in using WYSIWYGs — for the purposes that they were created for. The thing that makes us special is our ability to transform the tool by utilizing it beyond its obvious mainstream use. Most businesses don’t care about the intricate details about how an outcome is achieved, only that the delivered product does what they need it to do.

作为开发人员，使用所见即所得的目的并不存在任何耻辱。 使我们与众不同的是，我们可以通过利用工具来超越其明显的主流用途来对其进行转换。 大多数企业并不在乎如何实现结果的复杂细节，而只是在乎交付的产品能够完成他们需要的工作。

When we use all the tools that are available to us in creative ways, based on the skills that we have, it makes us invaluable as developers. This can come in the form of consuming APIs and using the data in a different format for an ancillary purpose. Or it can come in the form of extensions, where the WYSIWYG platform cuts down development time and saves us from the monotony of implementing something that’s already been done a million times over.

当我们根据已有的技能以创造性的方式使用所有可用的工具时，它使我们作为开发人员变得无价。 这可以采用消耗API的形式，也可以将其他格式的数据用于辅助目的。 或者它可以扩展的形式出现，所见即所得平台减少了开发时间，使我们免于实施已经完成一百万次的单调乏味的工作。

翻译自: https://medium.com/madhash/will-wysiwygs-price-developers-out-of-jobs-870dea5af867

vue 所见即所得开发