c语言 程序剩余时间,估计C 11中剩下的时间

Is there a function in that will convert the nanoseconds into

an std::string, say something like “3m12s”?

不,但我会告诉你如何轻松地在下面这样做.

Should I use the std::chrono::steady_clock::now() each time I update

my progress bar, and subtract that from _begin to determine time_left?

是.

Is there a better algorithm to determine time_left

是.见下文.

编辑

我原本把“滴答声”误解为“时钟滴答”,当实际上“滴答”有工作单位时,_ticks_occurred / _total_ticks可以解释为％job_done.所以我相应地改变了下面提出的progress_bar.

我相信等式：

time_left = (time_taken / _total_ticks) * (_total_ticks - _ticks_occured)

是不正确的.它没有通过健全性检查：如果_ticks_occured == 1且_total_ticks很大,那么time_left大约等于(ok,略少)time_taken.这没有意义.

我正在重写上面的等式：

time_left = time_taken * (1/percent_done - 1)

哪里

percent_done = _ticks_occurred/_total_ticks

现在,当percent_done接近零时,time_left接近无穷大,当percent_done接近1时,’time_left接近0.当percent_done为10％时,time_left为9 * time_taken.这符合我的期望,假设每个工作的时间成本大致是线性的.

class progress_bar

{

public:

progress_bar(uint64_t ticks)

: _total_ticks(ticks), _ticks_occurred(0),

_begin(std::chrono::steady_clock::now())

// ...

{}

void tick()

{

using namespace std::chrono;

// test to see if enough progress has elapsed

// to warrant updating the progress bar

// that way we aren't wasting resources printing

// something that hasn't changed

if (/* should we update */)

{

// somehow _ticks_occurred is updated here and is not zero

duration time_taken = Clock::now() - _begin;

float percent_done = (float)_ticks_occurred/_total_ticks;

duration time_left = time_taken * static_cast(1/percent_done - 1);

minutes minutes_left = duration_cast(time_left);

seconds seconds_left = duration_cast(time_left - minutes_left);

}

}

private:

typedef std::chrono::steady_clock Clock;

typedef Clock::time_point time_point;

typedef Clock::duration duration;

typedef Clock::rep rep;

std::uint64_t _total_ticks;

std::uint64_t _ticks_occurred;

time_point _begin;

//...

};

只要你可以,就可以在std :: chrono :: durations中进行交易.那样< chrono>为你完成所有转换. typedef可以使用长名称轻松输入.将时间分解为分钟和秒钟就像上面所示一样简单.

正如bames53在他的回答中所说,如果你想使用我的< chrono_io>设施,这也很酷.您的需求可能很简单,您不想这样做.这是一个判断电话. bames53的答案是一个很好的答案.我认为这些额外的细节也可能有所帮助.

编辑

我不小心在上面的代码中留下了一个错误.而不只是修补上面的代码,我认为指出错误并展示如何使用< chrono>是一个好主意.要解决这个问题.

错误在这里：

duration time_left = time_taken * static_cast(1/percent_done - 1);

和这里：

typedef Clock::duration duration;

实际上,steady_clock :: duration通常基于整数类型. 将此称为rep(表示的缩写).并且当percent_done大于50％时,乘以time_taken的因子将小于1.并且当rep为积分时,将其转换为0.因此,progress_bar仅在前50％期间表现良好并且预测0时间在过去的50％中离开了.

解决这个问题的关键是基于浮点而不是整数来计算持续时间.并且< chrono>使这很容易做到.

typedef std::chrono::steady_clock Clock;

typedef Clock::time_point time_point;

typedef Clock::period period;

typedef std::chrono::duration duration;

duration现在具有与steady_clock :: duration相同的tick周期,但使用float表示.现在time_left的计算可以不使用static_cast：

duration time_left = time_taken * (1/percent_done - 1);

以下是使用这些修复程序的整个包：

class progress_bar

{

public:

progress_bar(uint64_t ticks)

: _total_ticks(ticks), _ticks_occurred(0),

_begin(std::chrono::steady_clock::now())

// ...

{}

void tick()

{

using namespace std::chrono;

// test to see if enough progress has elapsed

// to warrant updating the progress bar

// that way we aren't wasting resources printing

// something that hasn't changed

if (/* should we update */)

{

// somehow _ticks_occurred is updated here and is not zero

duration time_taken = Clock::now() - _begin;

float percent_done = (float)_ticks_occurred/_total_ticks;

duration time_left = time_taken * (1/percent_done - 1);

minutes minutes_left = duration_cast(time_left);

seconds seconds_left = duration_cast(time_left - minutes_left);

std::cout << minutes_left.count() << "m " << seconds_left.count() << "s\n";

}

}

private:

typedef std::chrono::steady_clock Clock;

typedef Clock::time_point time_point;

typedef Clock::period period;

typedef std::chrono::duration duration;

std::uint64_t _total_ticks;

std::uint64_t _ticks_occurred;

time_point _begin;

//...

};

没有什么比一点测试…… 😉