java getgenericinterfaces_java – Class#getInterfaces()和Class#getGenericInterfaces()返回不同长度的数组...

// Compiled from AbstractPartialFunction.scala (version 1.6 : 50.0, super bit)

// Signature: Ljava/lang/Object;Lscala/Function1;Lscala/PartialFunction;

@scala.reflect.ScalaSignature(bytes="some bytes...")

public abstract class scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction implements scala.PartialFunction {

该类型的签名大致相当于此Java声明：

class AbstractPartialFunction implements PartialFunction, Function1 {}

PartialFunction扩展了Function1：

// Compiled from PartialFunction.scala (version 1.6 : 50.0, no super bit)

// Signature: Ljava/lang/Object;Lscala/Function1;

@scala.reflect.ScalaSignature(bytes="some bytes...")

public abstract interface scala.PartialFunction extends scala.Function1 {

ClassFile {

u4 magic;

u2 minor_version;

u2 major_version;

u2 constant_pool_count;

cp_info constant_pool[constant_pool_count-1];

u2 access_flags;

u2 this_class;

u2 super_class;

u2 interfaces_count;

u2 interfaces[interfaces_count];

u2 fields_count;

field_info fields[fields_count];

u2 methods_count;

method_info methods[methods_count];

u2 attributes_count;

attribute_info attributes[attributes_count];

}

类型实现的接口存储在常量池中,并由interfaces数组中的引用记录：

The Signature attribute records generic signature information for any class, interface, constructor or member whose generic signature in the Java programming language would include references to type variables or parameterized types.

所以这是我对所发生事情的有根据的猜测：

> Class.getInterfaces()返回interfaces数组中的值

> Class.getGenericInterfaces()使用类型签名构建其返回值

> Scala编译器从interfaces数组中删除Function1,因为PartialFunction扩展了Function1

> Scala编译器按原样保留类型签名

此行为与Oracle JDK从等效Java源生成的字节代码不同,但显然是在传递JVM加载类时所做的所有检查.