java 读取字符串效率_Java字符串拼接效率测试过程解析

测试代码：

public class StringJoinTest {

public static void main(String[] args) {

int count = 10000;

long begin, end, time;

begin = System.currentTimeMillis();

testString(count);

end = System.currentTimeMillis();

time = end - begin;

System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次，String消耗时间：" + time + "毫秒");

begin = System.currentTimeMillis();

testStringBuffer(count);

end = System.currentTimeMillis();

time = end - begin;

System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次，StringBuffer消耗时间：" + time + "毫秒");

begin = System.currentTimeMillis();

testStringBuilder(count);

end = System.currentTimeMillis();

time = end - begin;

System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次，StringBuilder消耗时间：" + time + "毫秒");

}

private static String testStringBuilder(int count) {

StringBuilder tem = new StringBuilder();

for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {

tem.append("hello world!");

}

return tem.toString();

}

private static String testStringBuffer(int count) {

StringBuffer tem = new StringBuffer();

for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {

tem.append("hello world!");

}

return tem.toString();

}

private static String testString(int count) {

String tem = "";

for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {

tem += "hello world!";

}

return tem;

}

}

测试结果：

结论：

在少量字符串拼接时还看不出差别，但随着数量的增加，String+拼接效率显著降低。在达到100万次，我本机电脑已经无法执行String+拼接了，StringBuilder效率略高于StringBuffer。所以在开发过程中通常情况下推荐使用StringBuilder。

StringBuffer和StringBuilder的区别在于StringBuffer是线程安全的。

以上就是本文的全部内容，希望对大家的学习有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持脚本之家。