python 覆盖写后读出来有乱码_python写文件打开后是乱码

更新：

我在路上就在想，这么底层的一个特性，为什么 Python 没有为程序员处理掉呢？都用 Python 了，谁会为了那么大的便利牺牲一丁点性能呢？一回来我就做了测试。

经测试，Python 2.7.5 on Windows XP 重现此情况，Python 3.3.2 on Windows XP 没有重现。这说明 Python 2 确实该换了！

再次更新：

找到原因之后我就觉得这问题在哪里见过，今天终于找出来了， python-cn 邮件列表里讨论过的。

真正的答案来啦～～我在 MSDN 里找得好苦哦 QAQ

真正的原因不在于 Python 怎么样了，而在于 Windows 怎么样了。经查源码(Python 2.7.6)Objects/fileobject.c:2837，Python 是使用 fopen/fread/fwrite 这系列函数来读写文件的。MSDN 说：

When the "r+", "w+", or "a+" access type is specified, both reading and writing are allowed (the file is said to be open for "update"). However, when you switch from reading to writing, the input operation must encounter an EOF marker. If there is no EOF, you must use an intervening call to a file positioning function. The file positioning functions are fsetpos, fseek, and rewind. When you switch from writing to reading, you must use an intervening call to either fflush or to a file positioning function.

所以会有 @沙渺 发现添加 flush() 调用后正确的结果。

Linux 下没有重现。man 3 fopen 说：

Reads and writes may be intermixed on read/write streams in any order. Note that ANSI C requires that a file positioning function intervene between output and input, unless an input operation encounters end-of-file. (If this condition is not met, then a read is allowed to return the result of writes other than the most recent.) Therefore it is good practice (and indeed sometimes necessary under Linux) to put an fseek(3) or fgetpos(3) operation between write and read operations on such a stream. This operation may be an apparent no-op (as in fseek(..., 0L, SEEK_CUR) called for its synchronizing side effect.

所以 Windows 的这种行为是符合 ANSI C 标准的，但是 Linux 并不(总是)需要这样做。(并且，跨平台的方案是使用文件定位函数而不是 fflush()。)