java2e_java2e performance guides的一点疑问

String variables[] = new String[50000];

for( int i=0;i

variables[i] = "s"+i;

}

// create String literals

long startTime0 = System.currentTimeMillis();

for(int i=0;i

variables[i] = "hello";

}

long endTime0 = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Time taken for creation of String literals : "

+ (endTime0 - startTime0) + " milli seconds" );

// create String objects using 'new' keyword

long startTime1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

for(int i=0;i

variables[i] = new String("hello");

}

long endTime1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Time taken for creation of String objects with 'new' key word : "

+ (endTime1 - startTime1)+" milli seconds");

long startTime2 = System.currentTimeMillis();

for(int i=0;i

variables[i] = new String("hello");

variables[i] = variables[i].intern();

}

long endTime2 = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Time taken for creation of String objects with intern(): "

+ (endTime2 - startTime2)+" milli seconds");

这段代码在文章中给出的结果为:

Time taken for creation of String literals : 0 milli seconds

Time taken for creation of String objects with 'new' key word : 160 milli seconds

Time taken for creation of String objects with intern(): 60 milli seconds

但是我在电脑上实际运行结果为:

Time taken for creation of String literals : 0 milli seconds

Time taken for creation of String objects with 'new' key word : 3 milli seconds

Time taken for creation of String objects with intern(): 7 milli seconds

刨除硬件运行速度差异,明显区别还是String.intern()执行到底有没有带来效率上的提高.似乎我的运行结果与作者要说明的事实恰恰相反.

分享到：

2011-03-06 14:00

浏览 661

评论