LongAdder源码阅读中关于cellsbusy双重检查的作用

 final void longAccumulate(long x, LongBinaryOperator fn,
                              boolean wasUncontended) {
        int h;
        if ((h = getProbe()) == 0) {
            ThreadLocalRandom.current(); // force initialization
            h = getProbe();
            wasUncontended = true;
        }
        boolean collide = false;                // True if last slot nonempty
        for (;;) {
            Cell[] as; Cell a; int n; long v;
            if ((as = cells) != null && (n = as.length) > 0) {
                if ((a = as[(n - 1) & h]) == null) {
                    if (cellsBusy == 0) {       // Try to attach new Cell
                        Cell r = new Cell(x);   // Optimistically create
                        if (cellsBusy == 0 && casCellsBusy()) {
                            boolean created = false;
                            try {               // Recheck under lock
                                Cell[] rs; int m, j;
                                if ((rs = cells) != null &&
                                    (m = rs.length) > 0 &&
                                    rs[j = (m - 1) & h] == null) {
                                    rs[j] = r;
                                    created = true;
                                }
                            } finally {
                                cellsBusy = 0;
                            }
                            if (created)
                                break;
                            continue;           // Slot is now non-empty
                        }
                    }
                    collide = false;
                }
                else if (!wasUncontended)       // CAS already known to fail
                    wasUncontended = true;      // Continue after rehash
                else if (a.cas(v = a.value, ((fn == null) ? v + x :
                                             fn.applyAsLong(v, x))))
                    break;
                else if (n >= NCPU || cells != as)
                    collide = false;            // At max size or stale
                else if (!collide)
                    collide = true;
                else if (cellsBusy == 0 && casCellsBusy()) {
                    try {
                        if (cells == as) {      // Expand table unless stale
                            Cell[] rs = new Cell[n << 1];
                            for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
                                rs[i] = as[i];
                            cells = rs;
                        }
                    } finally {
                        cellsBusy = 0;
                    }
                    collide = false;
                    continue;                   // Retry with expanded table
                }
                h = advanceProbe(h);
            }
            else if (cellsBusy == 0 && cells == as && casCellsBusy()) {
                boolean init = false;
                try {                           // Initialize table
                    if (cells == as) {
                        Cell[] rs = new Cell[2];
                        rs[h & 1] = new Cell(x);
                        cells = rs;
                        init = true;
                    }
                } finally {
                    cellsBusy = 0;
                }
                if (init)
                    break;
            }
            else if (casBase(v = base, ((fn == null) ? v + x :
                                        fn.applyAsLong(v, x))))
                break;                          // Fall back on using base
        }
    }

在思考在第二个红框内已经有了自旋锁，为什么还需要对cellsBusy进行双重检查？

我想了一下应该是让后继通过了第一重cellsBusy==0的线程能够简单判断cellsBusy状态而提前退出，不需要额外进行一次自旋锁检查，节省了开销。

额外一提的是，在多线程环境下，对于已经通过cellsBusy双重检查的程序A，若程序B运行的比A快，已经完成了cells槽的计算，并且重置了cellsBusy=0，则程序A经过自旋加锁后，会rs[j = (m - 1) & h] == null这个条件不成立而导致created保持false，就会运行到continue，重新进入for循环，然后在下列代码块进行值的累加。