集成学习-task06-boosting

学习目标:

学习基于Boosting方式的集成方法:
两类常用的Boosting方式:Adaptive Boosting 和 Gradient Boosting 以及它们的变体Xgboost、LightGBM以及Catboost。


学习内容:

Boosting方法是使用同一组数据集进行反复学习,得到一系列简单模型,然后组合这些模型构成一个预测性能十分强大的机器学习模型。

Adaboost算法

Adaboost算法如下:
(1) 初始化训练数据的分布:𝐷1=(𝑤11,⋯,𝑤1𝑖,⋯,𝑤1𝑁),𝑤1𝑖=1𝑁,𝑖=1,2,⋯,𝑁
(2) 对于m=1,2,…,M

使用具有权值分布𝐷𝑚的训练数据集进行学习,得到基本分类器:𝐺𝑚(𝑥):→{−1,+1}
计算𝐺𝑚(𝑥)在训练集上的分类误差率𝑒𝑚=∑𝑁𝑖=1𝑃(𝐺𝑚(𝑥𝑖)≠𝑦𝑖)=∑𝑁𝑖=1𝑤𝑚𝑖𝐼(𝐺𝑚(𝑥𝑖)≠𝑦𝑖)
计算𝐺𝑚(𝑥)的系数𝛼𝑚=12log1−𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑚,这里的log是自然对数ln
更新训练数据集的权重分布
𝐷𝑚+1=(𝑤𝑚+1,1,⋯,𝑤𝑚+1,𝑖,⋯,𝑤𝑚+1,𝑁)𝑤𝑚+1,𝑖=𝑤𝑚𝑖𝑍𝑚exp(−𝛼𝑚𝑦𝑖𝐺𝑚(𝑥𝑖)),𝑖=1,2,⋯,𝑁

这里的𝑍𝑚是规范化因子,使得𝐷𝑚+1称为概率分布,𝑍𝑚=∑𝑁𝑖=1𝑤𝑚𝑖exp(−𝛼𝑚𝑦𝑖𝐺𝑚(𝑥𝑖))
(3) 构建基本分类器的线性组合𝑓(𝑥)=∑𝑀𝑚=1𝛼𝑚𝐺𝑚(𝑥),得到最终的分类器

𝐺(𝑥)=sign(𝑓(𝑥))=sign(∑𝑚=1𝑀𝛼𝑚𝐺𝑚(𝑥))
使用sklearn对Adaboost算法进行建模:

# 引入数据科学相关工具包:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd 
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.style.use("ggplot")
%matplotlib inline
import seaborn as sns
# 加载训练数据:         
wine = pd.read_csv("https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/machine-learning-databases/wine/wine.data",header=None)
wine.columns = ['Class label', 'Alcohol', 'Malic acid', 'Ash', 'Alcalinity of ash','Magnesium', 'Total phenols','Flavanoids', 'Nonflavanoid phenols', 
                'Proanthocyanins','Color intensity', 'Hue','OD280/OD315 of diluted wines','Proline']
# 数据查看:
print("Class labels",np.unique(wine["Class label"]))
wine.head()

Class labels [1 2 3]

# 数据预处理
# 仅仅考虑2,3类葡萄酒,去除1类
wine = wine[wine['Class label'] != 1]
y = wine['Class label'].values
X = wine[['Alcohol','OD280/OD315 of diluted wines']].values

# 将分类标签变成二进制编码:
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder
le = LabelEncoder()
y = le.fit_transform(y)

# 按8:2分割训练集和测试集
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
X_train,X_test,y_train,y_test = train_test_split(X,y,test_size=0.2,random_state=1,stratify=y)  # stratify参数代表了按照y的类别等比例抽样
# 使用单一决策树建模
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
tree = DecisionTreeClassifier(criterion='entropy',random_state=1,max_depth=1)
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
tree = tree.fit(X_train,y_train)
y_train_pred = tree.predict(X_train)
y_test_pred = tree.predict(X_test)
tree_train = accuracy_score(y_train,y_train_pred)
tree_test = accuracy_score(y_test,y_test_pred)
print('Decision tree train/test accuracies %.3f/%.3f' % (tree_train,tree_test))
# 使用sklearn实现Adaboost(基分类器为决策树)
'''
AdaBoostClassifier相关参数:
base_estimator:基本分类器,默认为DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=1)
n_estimators:终止迭代的次数
learning_rate:学习率
algorithm:训练的相关算法,{'SAMME','SAMME.R'},默认='SAMME.R'
random_state:随机种子
'''
from sklearn.ensemble import AdaBoostClassifier
ada = AdaBoostClassifier(base_estimator=tree,n_estimators=500,learning_rate=0.1,random_state=1)
ada = ada.fit(X_train,y_train)
y_train_pred = ada.predict(X_train)
y_test_pred = ada.predict(X_test)
ada_train = accuracy_score(y_train,y_train_pred)
ada_test = accuracy_score(y_test,y_test_pred)
print('Adaboost train/test accuracies %.3f/%.3f' % (ada_train,ada_test))

结果分析:单层决策树似乎对训练数据欠拟合,而Adaboost模型正确地预测了训练数据的所有分类标签,而且与单层决策树相比,Adaboost的测试性能也略有提高。然而,为什么模型在训练集和测试集的性能相差这么大呢?我们使用图像来简单说明下这个道理!

# 画出单层决策树与Adaboost的决策边界:
x_min = X_train[:, 0].min() - 1
x_max = X_train[:, 0].max() + 1
y_min = X_train[:, 1].min() - 1
y_max = X_train[:, 1].max() + 1
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.arange(x_min, x_max, 0.1),np.arange(y_min, y_max, 0.1))
f, axarr = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2,sharex='col',sharey='row',figsize=(12, 6))
for idx, clf, tt in zip([0, 1],[tree, ada],['Decision tree', 'Adaboost']):
    clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
    Z = clf.predict(np.c_[xx.ravel(), yy.ravel()])
    Z = Z.reshape(xx.shape)
    axarr[idx].contourf(xx, yy, Z, alpha=0.3)
    axarr[idx].scatter(X_train[y_train==0, 0],X_train[y_train==0, 1],c='blue', marker='^')
    axarr[idx].scatter(X_train[y_train==1, 0],X_train[y_train==1, 1],c='red', marker='o')
    axarr[idx].set_title(tt)
axarr[0].set_ylabel('Alcohol', fontsize=12)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.text(0, -0.2,s='OD280/OD315 of diluted wines',ha='center',va='center',fontsize=12,transform=axarr[1].transAxes)
plt.show()

在这里插入图片描述
从上面的决策边界图可以看到:Adaboost模型的决策边界比单层决策树的决策边界要复杂的多。也就是说,Adaboost试图用增加模型复杂度而降低偏差的方式去减少总误差,但是过程中引入了方差,可能出现国拟合,因此在训练集和测试集之间的性能存在较大的差距,这就简单地回答的刚刚问题。值的注意的是:与单个分类器相比,Adaboost等Boosting模型增加了计算的复杂度,在实践中需要仔细思考是否愿意为预测性能的相对改善而增加计算成本,而且Boosting方式无法做到现在流行的并行计算的方式进行训练,因为每一步迭代都要基于上一部的基本分类器

前向分步算法

(1) 加法模型:
在Adaboost模型中,我们把每个基本分类器合成一个复杂分类器的方法是每个基本分类器的加权和,即: 𝑓(𝑥)=∑𝑀𝑚=1𝛽𝑚𝑏(𝑥;𝛾𝑚) ,其中, 𝑏(𝑥;𝛾𝑚) 为即基本分类器, 𝛾𝑚 为基本分类器的参数, 𝛽𝑚 为基本分类器的权重,显然这与第二章所学的加法模型。为什么这么说呢?大家把 𝑏(𝑥;𝛾𝑚) 看成是即函数即可。
在给定训练数据以及损失函数 𝐿(𝑦,𝑓(𝑥)) 的条件下,学习加法模型 𝑓(𝑥) 就是:
min𝛽𝑚,𝛾𝑚∑𝑖=1𝑁𝐿(𝑦𝑖,∑𝑚=1𝑀𝛽𝑚𝑏(𝑥𝑖;𝛾𝑚))

通常这是一个复杂的优化问题,很难通过简单的凸优化的相关知识进行解决。前向分步算法可以用来求解这种方式的问题,它的基本思路是:因为学习的是加法模型,如果从前向后,每一步只优化一个基函数及其系数,逐步逼近目标函数,那么就可以降低优化的复杂度。具体而言,每一步只需要优化:
min𝛽,𝛾∑𝑖=1𝑁𝐿(𝑦𝑖,𝛽𝑏(𝑥𝑖;𝛾))

(2) 前向分步算法:
给定数据集 𝑇={(𝑥1,𝑦1),(𝑥2,𝑦2),⋯,(𝑥𝑁,𝑦𝑁)} , 𝑥𝑖∈⊆𝐑𝑛 , 𝑦𝑖∈={+1,−1} 。损失函数 𝐿(𝑦,𝑓(𝑥)) ,基函数集合 {𝑏(𝑥;𝛾)} ,我们需要输出加法模型 𝑓(𝑥) 。

初始化: 𝑓0(𝑥)=0
对m = 1,2,…,M:
(a) 极小化损失函数:
(𝛽𝑚,𝛾𝑚)=argmin𝛽,𝛾∑𝑖=1𝑁𝐿(𝑦𝑖,𝑓𝑚−1(𝑥𝑖)+𝛽𝑏(𝑥𝑖;𝛾))

得到参数 𝛽𝑚 与 𝛾𝑚
(b) 更新:
𝑓𝑚(𝑥)=𝑓𝑚−1(𝑥)+𝛽𝑚𝑏(𝑥;𝛾𝑚)

得到加法模型:
𝑓(𝑥)=𝑓𝑀(𝑥)=∑𝑚=1𝑀𝛽𝑚𝑏(𝑥;𝛾𝑚)

这样,前向分步算法将同时求解从m=1到M的所有参数 𝛽𝑚 , 𝛾𝑚 的优化问题简化为逐次求解各个 𝛽𝑚 , 𝛾𝑚 的问题。
(3) 前向分步算法与Adaboost的关系:
由于这里不是我们的重点,我们主要阐述这里的结论,不做相关证明,具体的证明见李航老师的《统计学习方法》第八章的3.2节。Adaboost算法是前向分步算法的特例,Adaboost算法是由基本分类器组成的加法模型,损失函数为指数损失函数。

梯度提升决策树(GBDT)

下面我们来使用sklearn来使用GBDT:

from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error
from sklearn.datasets import make_friedman1
from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingRegressor

'''
GradientBoostingRegressor参数解释:
loss:{‘ls’, ‘lad’, ‘huber’, ‘quantile’}, default=’ls’:‘ls’ 指最小二乘回归. ‘lad’ (最小绝对偏差) 是仅基于输入变量的顺序信息的高度鲁棒的损失函数。. ‘huber’ 是两者的结合. ‘quantile’允许分位数回归(用于alpha指定分位数)
learning_rate:学习率缩小了每棵树的贡献learning_rate。在learning_rate和n_estimators之间需要权衡。
n_estimators:要执行的提升次数。
subsample:用于拟合各个基础学习者的样本比例。如果小于1.0,则将导致随机梯度增强。subsample与参数n_estimators。选择会导致方差减少和偏差增加。subsample < 1.0
criterion:{'friedman_mse','mse','mae'},默认='friedman_mse':“ mse”是均方误差,“ mae”是平均绝对误差。默认值“ friedman_mse”通常是最好的,因为在某些情况下它可以提供更好的近似值。
min_samples_split:拆分内部节点所需的最少样本数
min_samples_leaf:在叶节点处需要的最小样本数。
min_weight_fraction_leaf:在所有叶节点处(所有输入样本)的权重总和中的最小加权分数。如果未提供sample_weight,则样本的权重相等。
max_depth:各个回归模型的最大深度。最大深度限制了树中节点的数量。调整此参数以获得最佳性能;最佳值取决于输入变量的相互作用。
min_impurity_decrease:如果节点分裂会导致杂质的减少大于或等于该值,则该节点将被分裂。
min_impurity_split:提前停止树木生长的阈值。如果节点的杂质高于阈值,则该节点将分裂
max_features{‘auto’, ‘sqrt’, ‘log2’},int或float:寻找最佳分割时要考虑的功能数量:

如果为int,则max_features在每个分割处考虑特征。

如果为float,max_features则为小数,并 在每次拆分时考虑要素。int(max_features * n_features)

如果“auto”,则max_features=n_features。

如果是“ sqrt”,则max_features=sqrt(n_features)。

如果为“ log2”,则为max_features=log2(n_features)。

如果没有,则max_features=n_features。
'''

X, y = make_friedman1(n_samples=1200, random_state=0, noise=1.0)
X_train, X_test = X[:200], X[200:]
y_train, y_test = y[:200], y[200:]
est = GradientBoostingRegressor(n_estimators=100, learning_rate=0.1,
    max_depth=1, random_state=0, loss='ls').fit(X_train, y_train)
mean_squared_error(y_test, est.predict(X_test))

5.009154859960321

from sklearn.datasets import make_regression
from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingRegressor
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
X, y = make_regression(random_state=0)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
    X, y, random_state=0)
reg = GradientBoostingRegressor(random_state=0)
reg.fit(X_train, y_train)
reg.score(X_test, y_test)

0.43848663277068134

XGBoost算法

XGBoost是一个优化的分布式梯度增强库,旨在实现高效,灵活和便携。 它在Gradient Boosting框架下实现机器学习算法。 XGBoost提供了并行树提升(也称为GBDT,GBM),可以快速准确地解决许多数据科学问题。

# XGBoost原生工具库的上手:
import xgboost as xgb  # 引入工具库
# read in data
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix('demo/data/agaricus.txt.train')   # XGBoost的专属数据格式,但是也可以用dataframe或者ndarray
dtest = xgb.DMatrix('demo/data/agaricus.txt.test')  # # XGBoost的专属数据格式,但是也可以用dataframe或者ndarray
# specify parameters via map
param = {'max_depth':2, 'eta':1, 'objective':'binary:logistic' }    # 设置XGB的参数,使用字典形式传入
num_round = 2     # 使用线程数
bst = xgb.train(param, dtrain, num_round)   # 训练
# make prediction
preds = bst.predict(dtest)   # 预测
from IPython.display import IFrame
IFrame('https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/latest/parameter.html', width=1400, height=800)

参数调优的一般步骤:

  • 确定学习速率和提升参数调优的初始值
  • max_depth 和 min_child_weight 参数调优
  • gamma参数调优
  • subsample 和 colsample_bytree 参数优
  • 正则化参数alpha调优
  • 降低学习速率和使用更多的决策树
    数据接口(XGBoost可处理的数据格式DMatrix)
# 1.LibSVM文本格式文件
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix('train.svm.txt')
dtest = xgb.DMatrix('test.svm.buffer')
# 2.CSV文件(不能含类别文本变量,如果存在文本变量请做特征处理如one-hot)
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix('train.csv?format=csv&label_column=0')
dtest = xgb.DMatrix('test.csv?format=csv&label_column=0')
# 3.NumPy数组
data = np.random.rand(5, 10)  # 5 entities, each contains 10 features
label = np.random.randint(2, size=5)  # binary target
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(data, label=label)
# 4.scipy.sparse数组
csr = scipy.sparse.csr_matrix((dat, (row, col)))
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(csr)
# pandas数据框dataframe
data = pandas.DataFrame(np.arange(12).reshape((4,3)), columns=['a', 'b', 'c'])
label = pandas.DataFrame(np.random.randint(2, size=4))
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(data, label=label)
# 1.保存DMatrix到XGBoost二进制文件中
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix('train.svm.txt')
dtrain.save_binary('train.buffer')
# 2. 缺少的值可以用DMatrix构造函数中的默认值替换:
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(data, label=label, missing=-999.0)
# 3.可以在需要时设置权重:
w = np.random.rand(5, 1)
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(data, label=label, missing=-999.0, weight=w)

参数的设置方式:

# 加载并处理数据
df_wine = pd.read_csv('https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/machine-learning-databases/wine/wine.data',header=None)
df_wine.columns = ['Class label', 'Alcohol','Malic acid', 'Ash','Alcalinity of ash','Magnesium', 'Total phenols',
                   'Flavanoids', 'Nonflavanoid phenols','Proanthocyanins','Color intensity', 'Hue','OD280/OD315 of diluted wines','Proline'] 
df_wine = df_wine[df_wine['Class label'] != 1]  # drop 1 class      
y = df_wine['Class label'].values
X = df_wine[['Alcohol','OD280/OD315 of diluted wines']].values
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split  # 切分训练集与测试集
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder   # 标签化分类变量
le = LabelEncoder()
y = le.fit_transform(y)
X_train,X_test,y_train,y_test = train_test_split(X,y,test_size=0.2,random_state=1,stratify=y)
dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(X_train, label=y_train)
dtest = xgb.DMatrix(X_test)
# 1.Booster 参数
params = {
    'booster': 'gbtree',
    'objective': 'multi:softmax',  # 多分类的问题
    'num_class': 10,               # 类别数,与 multisoftmax 并用
    'gamma': 0.1,                  # 用于控制是否后剪枝的参数,越大越保守,一般0.1、0.2这样子。
    'max_depth': 12,               # 构建树的深度,越大越容易过拟合
    'lambda': 2,                   # 控制模型复杂度的权重值的L2正则化项参数,参数越大,模型越不容易过拟合。
    'subsample': 0.7,              # 随机采样训练样本
    'colsample_bytree': 0.7,       # 生成树时进行的列采样
    'min_child_weight': 3,
    'silent': 1,                   # 设置成1则没有运行信息输出,最好是设置为0.
    'eta': 0.007,                  # 如同学习率
    'seed': 1000,
    'nthread': 4,                  # cpu 线程数
    'eval_metric':'auc'
}
plst = params.items()
# evallist = [(dtest, 'eval'), (dtrain, 'train')]   # 指定验证集
# 2.训练
num_round = 10
bst = xgb.train( plst, dtrain, num_round)
#bst = xgb.train( plst, dtrain, num_round, evallist )
# 3.保存模型
bst.save_model('0001.model')
# dump model
bst.dump_model('dump.raw.txt')
# dump model with feature map
#bst.dump_model('dump.raw.txt', 'featmap.txt')
# 4.加载保存的模型:
bst = xgb.Booster({'nthread': 4})  # init model
bst.load_model('0001.model')  # load data
# 5.也可以设置早停机制(需要设置验证集)
train(..., evals=evals, early_stopping_rounds=10)
# 6.预测
ypred = bst.predict(dtest)
# 1.绘制重要性
xgb.plot_importance(bst)
# 2.绘制输出树
#xgb.plot_tree(bst, num_trees=2)
# 3.使用xgboost.to_graphviz()将目标树转换为graphviz
#xgb.to_graphviz(bst, num_trees=2)

在这里插入图片描述

Xgboost算法案例

分类案例

from sklearn.datasets import load_iris
import xgboost as xgb
from xgboost import plot_importance
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score   # 准确率
# 加载样本数据集
iris = load_iris()
X,y = iris.data,iris.target
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=1234565) # 数据集分割

# 算法参数
params = {
    'booster': 'gbtree',
    'objective': 'multi:softmax',
    'num_class': 3,
    'gamma': 0.1,
    'max_depth': 6,
    'lambda': 2,
    'subsample': 0.7,
    'colsample_bytree': 0.75,
    'min_child_weight': 3,
    'silent': 0,
    'eta': 0.1,
    'seed': 1,
    'nthread': 4,
}

plst = params.items()

dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(X_train, y_train) # 生成数据集格式
num_rounds = 500
model = xgb.train(plst, dtrain, num_rounds) # xgboost模型训练

# 对测试集进行预测
dtest = xgb.DMatrix(X_test)
y_pred = model.predict(dtest)

# 计算准确率
accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test,y_pred)
print("accuarcy: %.2f%%" % (accuracy*100.0))

# 显示重要特征
plot_importance(model)
plt.show()

accuarcy: 96.67%
在这里插入图片描述
回归案例

import xgboost as xgb
from xgboost import plot_importance
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.datasets import load_boston
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error

# 加载数据集
boston = load_boston()
X,y = boston.data,boston.target

# XGBoost训练过程
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=0)

params = {
    'booster': 'gbtree',
    'objective': 'reg:squarederror',
    'gamma': 0.1,
    'max_depth': 5,
    'lambda': 3,
    'subsample': 0.7,
    'colsample_bytree': 0.7,
    'min_child_weight': 3,
    'silent': 1,
    'eta': 0.1,
    'seed': 1000,
    'nthread': 4,
}

dtrain = xgb.DMatrix(X_train, y_train)
num_rounds = 300
plst = params.items()
model = xgb.train(plst, dtrain, num_rounds)

# 对测试集进行预测
dtest = xgb.DMatrix(X_test)
ans = model.predict(dtest)

# 显示重要特征
plot_importance(model)
plt.show()

在这里插入图片描述
XGBoost调参(结合sklearn网格搜索)

import xgboost as xgb
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score

iris = load_iris()
X,y = iris.data,iris.target
col = iris.target_names 
train_x, valid_x, train_y, valid_y = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.3, random_state=1)   # 分训练集和验证集
parameters = {
              'max_depth': [5, 10, 15, 20, 25],
              'learning_rate': [0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15],
              'n_estimators': [500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000],
              'min_child_weight': [0, 2, 5, 10, 20],
              'max_delta_step': [0, 0.2, 0.6, 1, 2],
              'subsample': [0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.85, 0.95],
              'colsample_bytree': [0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9],
              'reg_alpha': [0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1],
              'reg_lambda': [0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1],
              'scale_pos_weight': [0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1]

}

xlf = xgb.XGBClassifier(max_depth=10,
            learning_rate=0.01,
            n_estimators=2000,
            silent=True,
            objective='multi:softmax',
            num_class=3 ,          
            nthread=-1,
            gamma=0,
            min_child_weight=1,
            max_delta_step=0,
            subsample=0.85,
            colsample_bytree=0.7,
            colsample_bylevel=1,
            reg_alpha=0,
            reg_lambda=1,
            scale_pos_weight=1,
            seed=0,
            missing=None)

gs = GridSearchCV(xlf, param_grid=parameters, scoring='accuracy', cv=3)
gs.fit(train_x, train_y)

print("Best score: %0.3f" % gs.best_score_)
print("Best parameters set: %s" % gs.best_params_ )

Best score: 0.933
Best parameters set: {‘max_depth’: 5}

LightGBM算法

LightGBM也是像XGBoost一样,是一类集成算法,他跟XGBoost总体来说是一样的,算法本质上与Xgboost没有出入,只是在XGBoost的基础上进行了优化。

LightGBM的优点:

1)更快的训练效率

2)低内存使用

3)更高的准确率

4)支持并行化学习

5)可以处理大规模数据
LightGBM与网格搜索结合调参:

import lightgbm as lgb
from sklearn import metrics
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
 
canceData=load_breast_cancer()
X=canceData.data
y=canceData.target
X_train,X_test,y_train,y_test=train_test_split(X,y,random_state=0,test_size=0.2)
 
### 数据转换
print('数据转换')
lgb_train = lgb.Dataset(X_train, y_train, free_raw_data=False)
lgb_eval = lgb.Dataset(X_test, y_test, reference=lgb_train,free_raw_data=False)
 
### 设置初始参数--不含交叉验证参数
print('设置参数')
params = {
          'boosting_type': 'gbdt',
          'objective': 'binary',
          'metric': 'auc',
          'nthread':4,
          'learning_rate':0.1
          }
 
### 交叉验证(调参)
print('交叉验证')
max_auc = float('0')
best_params = {}
 
# 准确率
print("调参1:提高准确率")
for num_leaves in range(5,100,5):
    for max_depth in range(3,8,1):
        params['num_leaves'] = num_leaves
        params['max_depth'] = max_depth
 
        cv_results = lgb.cv(
                            params,
                            lgb_train,
                            seed=1,
                            nfold=5,
                            metrics=['auc'],
                            early_stopping_rounds=10,
                            verbose_eval=True
                            )
            
        mean_auc = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).max()
        boost_rounds = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).idxmax()
            
        if mean_auc >= max_auc:
            max_auc = mean_auc
            best_params['num_leaves'] = num_leaves
            best_params['max_depth'] = max_depth
if 'num_leaves' and 'max_depth' in best_params.keys():          
    params['num_leaves'] = best_params['num_leaves']
    params['max_depth'] = best_params['max_depth']
 
# 过拟合
print("调参2:降低过拟合")
for max_bin in range(5,256,10):
    for min_data_in_leaf in range(1,102,10):
            params['max_bin'] = max_bin
            params['min_data_in_leaf'] = min_data_in_leaf
            
            cv_results = lgb.cv(
                                params,
                                lgb_train,
                                seed=1,
                                nfold=5,
                                metrics=['auc'],
                                early_stopping_rounds=10,
                                verbose_eval=True
                                )
                    
            mean_auc = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).max()
            boost_rounds = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).idxmax()
 
            if mean_auc >= max_auc:
                max_auc = mean_auc
                best_params['max_bin']= max_bin
                best_params['min_data_in_leaf'] = min_data_in_leaf
if 'max_bin' and 'min_data_in_leaf' in best_params.keys():
    params['min_data_in_leaf'] = best_params['min_data_in_leaf']
    params['max_bin'] = best_params['max_bin']
 
print("调参3:降低过拟合")
for feature_fraction in [0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.0]:
    for bagging_fraction in [0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.0]:
        for bagging_freq in range(0,50,5):
            params['feature_fraction'] = feature_fraction
            params['bagging_fraction'] = bagging_fraction
            params['bagging_freq'] = bagging_freq
            
            cv_results = lgb.cv(
                                params,
                                lgb_train,
                                seed=1,
                                nfold=5,
                                metrics=['auc'],
                                early_stopping_rounds=10,
                                verbose_eval=True
                                )
                    
            mean_auc = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).max()
            boost_rounds = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).idxmax()
 
            if mean_auc >= max_auc:
                max_auc=mean_auc
                best_params['feature_fraction'] = feature_fraction
                best_params['bagging_fraction'] = bagging_fraction
                best_params['bagging_freq'] = bagging_freq
 
if 'feature_fraction' and 'bagging_fraction' and 'bagging_freq' in best_params.keys():
    params['feature_fraction'] = best_params['feature_fraction']
    params['bagging_fraction'] = best_params['bagging_fraction']
    params['bagging_freq'] = best_params['bagging_freq']
 
 
print("调参4:降低过拟合")
for lambda_l1 in [1e-5,1e-3,1e-1,0.0,0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7,0.9,1.0]:
    for lambda_l2 in [1e-5,1e-3,1e-1,0.0,0.1,0.4,0.6,0.7,0.9,1.0]:
        params['lambda_l1'] = lambda_l1
        params['lambda_l2'] = lambda_l2
        cv_results = lgb.cv(
                            params,
                            lgb_train,
                            seed=1,
                            nfold=5,
                            metrics=['auc'],
                            early_stopping_rounds=10,
                            verbose_eval=True
                            )
                
        mean_auc = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).max()
        boost_rounds = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).idxmax()
 
        if mean_auc >= max_auc:
            max_auc=mean_auc
            best_params['lambda_l1'] = lambda_l1
            best_params['lambda_l2'] = lambda_l2
if 'lambda_l1' and 'lambda_l2' in best_params.keys():
    params['lambda_l1'] = best_params['lambda_l1']
    params['lambda_l2'] = best_params['lambda_l2']
 
print("调参5:降低过拟合2")
for min_split_gain in [0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.0]:
    params['min_split_gain'] = min_split_gain
    
    cv_results = lgb.cv(
                        params,
                        lgb_train,
                        seed=1,
                        nfold=5,
                        metrics=['auc'],
                        early_stopping_rounds=10,
                        verbose_eval=True
                        )
            
    mean_auc = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).max()
    boost_rounds = pd.Series(cv_results['auc-mean']).idxmax()
 
    if mean_auc >= max_auc:
        max_auc=mean_auc
        
        best_params['min_split_gain'] = min_split_gain
if 'min_split_gain' in best_params.keys():
    params['min_split_gain'] = best_params['min_split_gain']
 
print(best_params)

{‘bagging_fraction’: 0.7,
‘bagging_freq’: 30,
‘feature_fraction’: 0.8,
‘lambda_l1’: 0.1,
‘lambda_l2’: 0.0,
‘max_bin’: 255,
‘max_depth’: 4,
‘min_data_in_leaf’: 81,
‘min_split_gain’: 0.1,
‘num_leaves’: 10}

结语

主要探讨了基于Boosting方式的集成方法,其中主要讲解了基于错误率驱动的Adaboost,基于残差改进的提升树,基于梯度提升的GBDT,基于泰勒二阶近似的Xgboost以及LightGBM。


  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值