基于轻量级卷积神经网络模型实践Fruits360果蔬识别——自主构建CNN模型、轻量化改造设计lenet、alexnet、vgg16、vgg19和mobilenet共六种CNN模型实验对比分析

如果看过我之前文章的话相信对于fruits360数据集就是比较熟悉的了,我之前就已经做过了相关的项目实践了,文章如下感兴趣的话可以自行移步阅读即可:

《Fruits 360 基于CNN实现果蔬识别系统》

首先看下效果:

 数据集这里简单介绍下如下所示:

 一共有131个类别的数据。

训练集-测试集详情如下:

Total Train Number:  67692
Total Test Number:  22688

各类别详情如下:

训练集
{
	"Apple Braeburn": 492,
	"Apple Crimson Snow": 444,
	"Apple Golden 1": 480,
	"Apple Golden 2": 492,
	"Apple Golden 3": 481,
	"Apple Granny Smith": 492,
	"Apple Pink Lady": 456,
	"Apple Red 1": 492,
	"Apple Red 2": 492,
	"Apple Red 3": 429,
	"Apple Red Delicious": 490,
	"Apple Red Yellow 1": 492,
	"Apple Red Yellow 2": 672,
	"Apricot": 492,
	"Avocado": 427,
	"Avocado ripe": 491,
	"Banana": 490,
	"Banana Lady Finger": 450,
	"Banana Red": 490,
	"Beetroot": 450,
	"Blueberry": 462,
	"Cactus fruit": 490,
	"Cantaloupe 1": 492,
	"Cantaloupe 2": 492,
	"Carambula": 490,
	"Cauliflower": 702,
	"Cherry 1": 492,
	"Cherry 2": 738,
	"Cherry Rainier": 738,
	"Cherry Wax Black": 492,
	"Cherry Wax Red": 492,
	"Cherry Wax Yellow": 492,
	"Chestnut": 450,
	"Clementine": 490,
	"Cocos": 490,
	"Corn": 450,
	"Corn Husk": 462,
	"Cucumber Ripe": 392,
	"Cucumber Ripe 2": 468,
	"Dates": 490,
	"Eggplant": 468,
	"Fig": 702,
	"Ginger Root": 297,
	"Granadilla": 490,
	"Grape Blue": 984,
	"Grape Pink": 492,
	"Grape White": 490,
	"Grape White 2": 490,
	"Grape White 3": 492,
	"Grape White 4": 471,
	"Grapefruit Pink": 490,
	"Grapefruit White": 492,
	"Guava": 490,
	"Hazelnut": 464,
	"Huckleberry": 490,
	"Kaki": 490,
	"Kiwi": 466,
	"Kohlrabi": 471,
	"Kumquats": 490,
	"Lemon": 492,
	"Lemon Meyer": 490,
	"Limes": 490,
	"Lychee": 490,
	"Mandarine": 490,
	"Mango": 490,
	"Mango Red": 426,
	"Mangostan": 300,
	"Maracuja": 490,
	"Melon Piel de Sapo": 738,
	"Mulberry": 492,
	"Nectarine": 492,
	"Nectarine Flat": 480,
	"Nut Forest": 654,
	"Nut Pecan": 534,
	"Onion Red": 450,
	"Onion Red Peeled": 445,
	"Onion White": 438,
	"Orange": 479,
	"Papaya": 492,
	"Passion Fruit": 490,
	"Peach": 492,
	"Peach 2": 738,
	"Peach Flat": 492,
	"Pear": 492,
	"Pear 2": 696,
	"Pear Abate": 490,
	"Pear Forelle": 702,
	"Pear Kaiser": 300,
	"Pear Monster": 490,
	"Pear Red": 666,
	"Pear Stone": 711,
	"Pear Williams": 490,
	"Pepino": 490,
	"Pepper Green": 444,
	"Pepper Orange": 702,
	"Pepper Red": 666,
	"Pepper Yellow": 666,
	"Physalis": 492,
	"Physalis with Husk": 492,
	"Pineapple": 490,
	"Pineapple Mini": 493,
	"Pitahaya Red": 490,
	"Plum": 447,
	"Plum 2": 420,
	"Plum 3": 900,
	"Pomegranate": 492,
	"Pomelo Sweetie": 450,
	"Potato Red": 450,
	"Potato Red Washed": 453,
	"Potato Sweet": 450,
	"Potato White": 450,
	"Quince": 490,
	"Rambutan": 492,
	"Raspberry": 490,
	"Redcurrant": 492,
	"Salak": 490,
	"Strawberry": 492,
	"Strawberry Wedge": 738,
	"Tamarillo": 490,
	"Tangelo": 490,
	"Tomato 1": 738,
	"Tomato 2": 672,
	"Tomato 3": 738,
	"Tomato 4": 479,
	"Tomato Cherry Red": 492,
	"Tomato Heart": 684,
	"Tomato Maroon": 367,
	"Tomato not Ripened": 474,
	"Tomato Yellow": 459,
	"Walnut": 735,
	"Watermelon": 475
}



测试集
{
	"Apple Braeburn": 164,
	"Apple Crimson Snow": 148,
	"Apple Golden 1": 160,
	"Apple Golden 2": 164,
	"Apple Golden 3": 161,
	"Apple Granny Smith": 164,
	"Apple Pink Lady": 152,
	"Apple Red 1": 164,
	"Apple Red 2": 164,
	"Apple Red 3": 144,
	"Apple Red Delicious": 166,
	"Apple Red Yellow 1": 164,
	"Apple Red Yellow 2": 219,
	"Apricot": 164,
	"Avocado": 143,
	"Avocado ripe": 166,
	"Banana": 166,
	"Banana Lady Finger": 152,
	"Banana Red": 166,
	"Beetroot": 150,
	"Blueberry": 154,
	"Cactus fruit": 166,
	"Cantaloupe 1": 164,
	"Cantaloupe 2": 164,
	"Carambula": 166,
	"Cauliflower": 234,
	"Cherry 1": 164,
	"Cherry 2": 246,
	"Cherry Rainier": 246,
	"Cherry Wax Black": 164,
	"Cherry Wax Red": 164,
	"Cherry Wax Yellow": 164,
	"Chestnut": 153,
	"Clementine": 166,
	"Cocos": 166,
	"Corn": 150,
	"Corn Husk": 154,
	"Cucumber Ripe": 130,
	"Cucumber Ripe 2": 156,
	"Dates": 166,
	"Eggplant": 156,
	"Fig": 234,
	"Ginger Root": 99,
	"Granadilla": 166,
	"Grape Blue": 328,
	"Grape Pink": 164,
	"Grape White": 166,
	"Grape White 2": 166,
	"Grape White 3": 164,
	"Grape White 4": 158,
	"Grapefruit Pink": 166,
	"Grapefruit White": 164,
	"Guava": 166,
	"Hazelnut": 157,
	"Huckleberry": 166,
	"Kaki": 166,
	"Kiwi": 156,
	"Kohlrabi": 157,
	"Kumquats": 166,
	"Lemon": 164,
	"Lemon Meyer": 166,
	"Limes": 166,
	"Lychee": 166,
	"Mandarine": 166,
	"Mango": 166,
	"Mango Red": 142,
	"Mangostan": 102,
	"Maracuja": 166,
	"Melon Piel de Sapo": 246,
	"Mulberry": 164,
	"Nectarine": 164,
	"Nectarine Flat": 160,
	"Nut Forest": 218,
	"Nut Pecan": 178,
	"Onion Red": 150,
	"Onion Red Peeled": 155,
	"Onion White": 146,
	"Orange": 160,
	"Papaya": 164,
	"Passion Fruit": 166,
	"Peach": 164,
	"Peach 2": 246,
	"Peach Flat": 164,
	"Pear": 164,
	"Pear 2": 232,
	"Pear Abate": 166,
	"Pear Forelle": 234,
	"Pear Kaiser": 102,
	"Pear Monster": 166,
	"Pear Red": 222,
	"Pear Stone": 237,
	"Pear Williams": 166,
	"Pepino": 166,
	"Pepper Green": 148,
	"Pepper Orange": 234,
	"Pepper Red": 222,
	"Pepper Yellow": 222,
	"Physalis": 164,
	"Physalis with Husk": 164,
	"Pineapple": 166,
	"Pineapple Mini": 163,
	"Pitahaya Red": 166,
	"Plum": 151,
	"Plum 2": 142,
	"Plum 3": 304,
	"Pomegranate": 164,
	"Pomelo Sweetie": 153,
	"Potato Red": 150,
	"Potato Red Washed": 151,
	"Potato Sweet": 150,
	"Potato White": 150,
	"Quince": 166,
	"Rambutan": 164,
	"Raspberry": 166,
	"Redcurrant": 164,
	"Salak": 162,
	"Strawberry": 164,
	"Strawberry Wedge": 246,
	"Tamarillo": 166,
	"Tangelo": 166,
	"Tomato 1": 246,
	"Tomato 2": 225,
	"Tomato 3": 246,
	"Tomato 4": 160,
	"Tomato Cherry Red": 164,
	"Tomato Heart": 228,
	"Tomato Maroon": 127,
	"Tomato not Ripened": 158,
	"Tomato Yellow": 153,
	"Walnut": 249,
	"Watermelon": 157
}

整体的建模流程可以参考前面的文章即可。

本文的主要目的是为了轻量化改造上文提及的五种模型,当然了lenet和mobilnet本身就是很轻量级的,这里基本不做改动,另外自己也搭建了相对简单的CNN模型,想依次对这六种模型分别进行实验分析,之后整体对比。

首先是自己搭建的网络模型,这里只有三层卷积,如下所示:

 接下来是lenet,保持原始的结构:

 之后是alexnet,alexnet本身网络的参数里还是较大的,这里主要是缩减参数量级,如下:

 下面是mobilenet模型,这个本身就是轻量级的模型,这里就不再多赘述了,最后是VGG模型,本身VGG是非常成功的模型,主要有两款分别是vgg16和vgg19,但是每一款的参数里都是比较大的,这里主要是对网络结构进行精简,同时为了进一步简化计算,对每层的网络参数进行缩减,这里以vgg16为例,看下结构,vgg19也是同样的道理:

 完成模型结构设计与改造后,接下来就是漫长的实验训练,这个阶段就直接不多讲了,我们直接来看结果,为了直观对六组模型进行对比分析,这里对其进行综合的对比可视化。

【训练loss曲线】

 【验证loss曲线】

 【训练accuracy曲线】

 【验证accuracy曲线】

 整体看其实并没有看出来很明显的差距,究其原因可能就是跟数据集比较“正”有关系吧,本身场景还是很简单。 

最后我又绘制了loss和accuracy的整体对比曲线如下所示:

【损失曲线】

 【准确率曲线】

 这些实验足足用掉了一整天的时间,写到这里手都发软了,写作不易,记录一下!

  • 1
    点赞
  • 17
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 打赏
    打赏
  • 3
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论 3
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

Together_CZ

你的鼓励将是我创作的最大动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值