Capacitated Facility Location Problem两种解决方法和对比

本文介绍了Capacitated Facility Location Problem的问题描述、建模,并通过贪心算法和禁忌搜索两种方法进行求解。贪心算法策略是按customer成本排序并分配,而禁忌搜索则采用启发式搜索策略,包括初始解获取、移动领域、禁忌表长度、停止准则和禁忌破除等步骤。每种方法都有相应的代码实现和结果展示。
摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

Capacitated Facility Location Problem

问题描述

Suppose there are n facilities and m customers. We wish to choose:

  1. which of the n facilities to open
  2. the assignment of customers to facilities
  3. The objective is to minimize the sum of the opening cost and the assignment cost.
  4. The total demand assigned to a facility must not exceed its capacity

问题建模

设集合 I I I = { 1, … , m } 是所有Facilities

集合 J J J = { 1, …, n } 是所有Customers

对于每个Customer 都有一个 demand, d j d_j dj,只能被一个facility提供

对于每个Facility 都有一个 capacity, b i b_i bi,是该facility最多能提供的容量

对于每个Facility 都有一个 fixed cost, f i f_i fi,当该facility开启的时候固定的开销

定义 c i j c_{ij} cij 是facility j j j满足 customer i i i 的要求的开销

对于每个facility i ∈ I i \in I iI,定义变量 y i y_i yi

y i = { 1 如 果 f a c i l i t y i 开 启 0 如 果 f a c i l i t y i 关 闭 y_i = \begin{cases} 1 & 如果facility & i开启 \\ 0 & 如果facility & i关闭 \end{cases} yi={ 10facilityfacilityii

对于每个facility i ∈ I i \in I iI,每个customer j ∈ J j \in J jJ, 定义变量 x i j x_{ij} xij

x i j = { 1 如 果 c u s t o m e r i 被 f a c i l i t y j 服 务 0 否 则 x_{ij} = \begin{cases} 1 & 如果customer&i 被facility&j服务\\ 0 & 否则 \end{cases} xij={ 10customerifacilityj

对于Single Source Capacitated Facility Location Problemk可以描述为如下

(1) min ⁡ ∑ i ∈ I ∑ j ∈ J c i j x i j + ∑ i ∈ I f i y i \min \sum_{i \in I} \sum_{j \in J} c_{ij}x_{ij} + \sum_{i \in I}f_iy_i \tag1 miniIjJcijxij+iIf

  • 1
    点赞
  • 8
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
Here is a basic implementation of CVRP in Python using the Google OR-Tools library: ```python from ortools.constraint_solver import routing_enums_pb2 from ortools.constraint_solver import pywrapcp def create_data_model(): """Stores the data for the problem.""" data = {} data['distance_matrix'] = [ [0, 548, 776, 696, 582, 274, 502, 194, 308, 194, 536, 502], [548, 0, 684, 308, 194, 502, 730, 354, 696, 742, 1084, 594], [776, 684, 0, 992, 878, 502, 274, 810, 468, 742, 400, 1278], [696, 308, 992, 0, 114, 650, 878, 502, 844, 890, 1232, 514], [582, 194, 878, 114, 0, 536, 764, 388, 730, 776, 1118, 400], [274, 502, 502, 650, 536, 0, 228, 308, 194, 240, 582, 810], [502, 730, 274, 878, 764, 228, 0, 536, 194, 468, 354, 1016], [194, 354, 810, 502, 388, 308, 536, 0, 342, 388, 730, 468], [308, 696, 468, 844, 730, 194, 194, 342, 0, 274, 388, 810], [194, 742, 742, 890, 776, 240, 468, 388, 274, 0, 342, 650], [536, 1084, 400, 1232, 1118, 582, 354, 730, 388, 342, 0, 878], [502, 594, 1278, 514, 400, 810, 1016, 468, 810, 650, 878, 0] ] data['num_vehicles'] = 3 data['vehicle_capacities'] = [100, 100, 100] data['depot'] = 0 return data def print_solution(data, manager, routing, solution): """Prints solution on console.""" total_distance = 0 total_load = 0 for vehicle_id in range(data['num_vehicles']): index = routing.Start(vehicle_id) plan_output = 'Route for vehicle {}:\n'.format(vehicle_id) route_distance = 0 route_load = 0 while not routing.IsEnd(index): node_index = manager.IndexToNode(index) route_load += data['demands'][node_index] plan_output += ' {} Load({}) -> '.format(node_index, route_load) previous_index = index index = solution.Value(routing.NextVar(index)) route_distance += routing.GetArcCostForVehicle( previous_index, index, vehicle_id) plan_output += ' {} Load({})\n'.format(manager.IndexToNode(index), route_load) plan_output += 'Distance of the route: {}m\n'.format(route_distance) plan_output += 'Load of the route: {}\n'.format(route_load) print(plan_output) total_distance += route_distance total_load += route_load print('Total distance of all routes: {}m'.format(total_distance)) print('Total load of all routes: {}'.format(total_load)) def main(): """Entry point of the program.""" data = create_data_model() manager = pywrapcp.RoutingIndexManager(len(data['distance_matrix']), data['num_vehicles'], data['depot']) routing = pywrapcp.RoutingModel(manager) def distance_callback(from_index, to_index): """Returns the distance between the two nodes.""" from_node = manager.IndexToNode(from_index) to_node = manager.IndexToNode(to_index) return data['distance_matrix'][from_node][to_node] transit_callback_index = routing.RegisterTransitCallback(distance_callback) routing.SetArcCostEvaluatorOfAllVehicles(transit_callback_index) dimension_name = 'Capacity' routing.AddDimension( transit_callback_index, 0, # no slack 100, # vehicle maximum capacities True, # start cumul to zero dimension_name) capacity_dimension = routing.GetDimensionOrDie(dimension_name) for i, demand in enumerate(data['demands']): index = manager.NodeToIndex(i) capacity_dimension.SetDemand(index, demand) for vehicle_id in range(data['num_vehicles']): index = routing.Start(vehicle_id) capacity_dimension.CumulVar(index).SetRange(data['vehicle_capacities'][vehicle_id], data['vehicle_capacities'][vehicle_id]) search_parameters = pywrapcp.DefaultRoutingSearchParameters() search_parameters.first_solution_strategy = ( routing_enums_pb2.FirstSolutionStrategy.PARALLEL_CHEAPEST_INSERTION) solution = routing.SolveWithParameters(search_parameters) if solution: print_solution(data, manager, routing, solution) if __name__ == '__main__': main() ``` Note that this is just a basic implementation and can be modified to suit specific requirements and constraints of individual problem instances.
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值