在我们调优MySQL的SQL时候,通常使用explain进行查看sql的执行计划。至于优化器为什么会这样选择,就无从得知。如果你想了解为什么,那么可以通过trace文件能够进一步了解为什么优化器选择A执行计划而不选择B执行计划.帮助我们更好的理解优化器的行为.
打开trace,并设置格式为Json
SET OPTIMIZER_TRACE=“enabled=on”,END_MARKERS_IN_JSON=on;
设置trace使用的内存大小,避免解析过程内存不足,文件显示不完整.
SET OPTIMIZER_TRACE_MAX_MEM_SIZE=1000000;
执行你的sql语句
select * from a, b where a.id=b.sid;
查看trace信息
SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.OPTIMIZER_TRACE;
TRACE json文件
{
"steps": [
{
"join_preparation": { ---优化准备工作
"select#": 1,
"steps": [
{
"expanded_query": "/* select#1 */ select `a`.`id` AS `id`,`a`.`name` AS `name`,`a`.`age` AS `age`,`b`.`id` AS `id`,`b`.`sid` AS `sid`,`b`.`name` AS `name`,`b`.`score` AS `score` from `a` join `b` where (`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)"
}
] /* steps */
} /* join_preparation */
},
{
"join_optimization": {---优化工作的主要阶段,包括逻辑优化和物理优化两个阶段
"select#": 1,
"steps": [---优化工作的主要阶段, 逻辑优化阶段
{
"condition_processing": { ---逻辑优化,条件化简
"condition": "WHERE",
"original_condition": "(`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)",
"steps": [
{
"transformation": "equality_propagation", ---逻辑优化,条件化简,等式处理
"resulting_condition": "(`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)"
},
{
"transformation": "constant_propagation", ---逻辑优化,条件化简,常量处理
"resulting_condition": "(`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)"
},
{
"transformation": "trivial_condition_removal", ---逻辑优化,条件化简,条件去除
"resulting_condition": "(`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)"
}
] /* steps */
} /* condition_processing */
}, ---逻辑优化,条件化简,结束
{
"substitute_generated_columns": {
} /* substitute_generated_columns */
},
{
"table_dependencies": [ ---逻辑优化, 找出表之间的相互依赖关系. 非直接可用的优化方式.
{
"table": "`a`", ---表名
"row_may_be_null": false, ---是否有null值,flase是没有
"map_bit": 0,
"depends_on_map_bits": [
] /* depends_on_map_bits */
},
{
"table": "`b`",
"row_may_be_null": false,
"map_bit": 1,
"depends_on_map_bits": [
] /* depends_on_map_bits */
}
] /* table_dependencies */
},
{
"ref_optimizer_key_uses": [ ---逻辑优化, 找出备选的索引
{
"table": "`a`",
"field": "id", --索引字段
"equals": "`b`.`sid`", --连接的等值字段
"null_rejecting": false
},
{
"table": "`b`",
"field": "sid",
"equals": "`a`.`id`",
"null_rejecting": false
}
] /* ref_optimizer_key_uses */
},
{
"rows_estimation": [ ---逻辑优化, 估算每个表的元组个数. 单表上进行全表扫描和索引扫描的代价估算. 每个索引都估算索引扫描代价
{
"table": "`a`",
"table_scan": { ---逻辑优化, 估算每个表的元组个数. 单表上进行全表扫描的代价
"rows": 10,
"cost": 1
} /* table_scan */
},
{
"table": "`b`",
"table_scan": {
"rows": 21,
"cost": 1
} /* table_scan */
}
] /* rows_estimation */
},
{
"considered_execution_plans": [ ---物理优化, 开始多表连接的物理优化计算
{
"plan_prefix": [
] /* plan_prefix */,
"table": "`a`",
"best_access_path": {
"considered_access_paths": [
{
"access_type": "ref", ---物理优化, 计算indx_user索引上使用ref方查找的花费
"index": "PRIMARY",
"usable": false,
"chosen": false ---物理优化, 本应该比较所有的可用索引,即打印出多个格式相同的但索引名不同的内容,这里却没有。推测是bug--没有遍历每一个索引.
},
{
"rows_to_scan": 10,
"access_type": "scan",
"resulting_rows": 10,
"cost": 3,
"chosen": true
}
] /* considered_access_paths */
} /* best_access_path */,
"condition_filtering_pct": 100,
"rows_for_plan": 10,
"cost_for_plan": 3,
"rest_of_plan": [
{
"plan_prefix": [
"`a`"
] /* plan_prefix */,
"table": "`b`",
"best_access_path": {
"considered_access_paths": [
{
"access_type": "ref",
"index": "idx_sid",
"rows": 2.1,
"cost": 25.2,
"chosen": true
},
{
"rows_to_scan": 21,
"access_type": "scan",
"using_join_cache": true,
"buffers_needed": 1,
"resulting_rows": 21,
"cost": 43.006,
"chosen": false
}
] /* considered_access_paths */
} /* best_access_path */,
"condition_filtering_pct": 100,
"rows_for_plan": 21,
"cost_for_plan": 28.2,
"chosen": true
}
] /* rest_of_plan */
},
{
"plan_prefix": [
] /* plan_prefix */,
"table": "`b`",
"best_access_path": {
"considered_access_paths": [
{
"access_type": "ref",
"index": "idx_sid",
"usable": false,
"chosen": false
},
{
"rows_to_scan": 21,
"access_type": "scan",
"resulting_rows": 21,
"cost": 5.2,
"chosen": true
}
] /* considered_access_paths */
} /* best_access_path */,
"condition_filtering_pct": 100,
"rows_for_plan": 21,
"cost_for_plan": 5.2,
"rest_of_plan": [
{
"plan_prefix": [
"`b`"
] /* plan_prefix */,
"table": "`a`",
"best_access_path": {
"considered_access_paths": [
{
"access_type": "eq_ref",
"index": "PRIMARY",
"rows": 1,
"cost": 25.2,
"chosen": true,
"cause": "clustered_pk_chosen_by_heuristics"
},
{
"rows_to_scan": 10,
"access_type": "scan",
"using_join_cache": true,
"buffers_needed": 1,
"resulting_rows": 10,
"cost": 43.013,
"chosen": false
}
] /* considered_access_paths */
} /* best_access_path */,
"condition_filtering_pct": 100,
"rows_for_plan": 21,
"cost_for_plan": 30.4,
"pruned_by_cost": true
}
] /* rest_of_plan */
}
] /* considered_execution_plans */
},
{
"attaching_conditions_to_tables": {
"original_condition": "(`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)",
"attached_conditions_computation": [
] /* attached_conditions_computation */,
"attached_conditions_summary": [
{
"table": "`a`",
"attached": null
},
{
"table": "`b`",
"attached": "(`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)"
}
] /* attached_conditions_summary */
} /* attaching_conditions_to_tables */
},
{
"refine_plan": [
{
"table": "`a`"
},
{
"table": "`b`",
"pushed_index_condition": "(`a`.`id` = `b`.`sid`)",
"table_condition_attached": null
}
] /* refine_plan */
}
] /* steps */
} /* join_optimization */
},
{
"join_execution": {
"select#": 1,
"steps": [
] /* steps */
} /* join_execution */
}
] /* steps */
}
参考资料:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/optimizer-trace-table.html
https://www.cnblogs.com/katec/p/9239985.html