他们在想什么？

Browsing the UK Channel 4 website this evening I came across what seems to be a great idea – ORIGINATION:INSITE,

今天晚上浏览英国第四频道的网站时，我发现了一个好主意-ORIGINATION ：INSITE ，

“Over the next two years ORIGINATION INSITE, working with a number of outstanding cultural partners and in collaboration with Culture Online, will help people develop websites that reflect the diversity and makeup of modern Britain. These sites will form part of a network of sites linked to from the Channel 4 website.”

“在接下来的两年中， ORIGINATION INSITE与众多杰出的文化合作伙伴合作，并与Culture Online合作，将帮助人们开发反映现代英国多样性和构成的网站。 这些站点将构成从Channel 4网站链接的站点网络的一部分。”

The project is offering two day workshops to help people build their websites, to get their content out there onto the web. This seems like a fantastic idea for a project, and the content of some of the sites already developed is great … that is if you can access them. For this project, despite being able to choose from a whole host of excellent blog tools that can help non-technical users get their content out there in an accessible manner, chose some dreadful ‘web page building’ software. Therefore ensuring that all this really great content is marked up in a messy, invalid and inaccessible format.

该项目提供为期两天的研讨会，以帮助人们建立网站，并将其内容发布到网络上。 对于一个项目来说，这似乎是一个绝妙的主意，并且某些已经开发的网站的内容非常棒……也就是说，您可以访问它们。 对于该项目，尽管可以从众多优秀的博客工具中进行选择，这些工具可以帮助非技术用户以可访问的方式获取其内容，但还是选择了一些可怕的“网页构建”软件。 因此，请确保以一种混乱，无效和不可访问的格式标记所有这些非常好的内容。

What were Channel 4 thinking and who advised them on this project? The tools are out there to enable everyone to publish their content on the web and in a two day workshop you could do a lot with people on using a tool such as Wordpress – even to the point of editing templates – and at least the resulting content would have some lifespan, and be accessible to everyone today.

第四频道的想法是什么？谁为他们提供了有关此项目的建议？ 这些工具可以使每个人都可以在网上发布他们的内容，在为期两天的研讨会中，您可以与人们一起使用Wordpress之类的工具，甚至可以编辑模板，而且至少可以得到结果会有一定的寿命，并且今天所有人都可以使用。

翻译自: https://rachelandrew.co.uk/archives/2005/05/01/what-were-they-thinking/