This is clever. AideRSS is an smart RSS filterer gives just the Good, Great, Best or Top 20 posts given any RSS Feed. How does it measure quality? Well, since it can't really measure quality it infers it indirectly by creating a metric based on the number of del.icio.us bookmarks, diggs, Blogger references, Technorati references, Google BlogSearch reference, IceRocket references and a few others.
这很聪明。 AideRSS是一个智能的RSS过滤器,可以根据任何RSS Feed给出“好”,“好”,“最好”或“前20名”帖子。 它如何衡量质量? 好吧,由于它无法真正衡量质量,因此可以通过创建基于del.icio.us书签,digs,Blogger参考,Technorati参考,Google BlogSearch参考,IceRocket参考以及其他一些指标的指标来间接推断质量。
Of course, this assumes your blog is being read because it's interesting and these external references are a quantitative metric that implies quality. There, of course, are lots of great blogs with great content that haven't been discovered yet, but this is still a pretty neat way to apply these metrics.
当然,这假定您的博客正在被阅读是因为它很有趣,并且这些外部引用是表示质量的定量指标。 当然,那里还存在许多尚未发现的,内容丰富的优秀博客,但这仍然是应用这些指标的一种简洁方法。
So what do they do with these numbers? They create alternative feeds that you can subscribe to in lieu of the blog's main feed so as to just read about the "great posts" or "just the hits." Sounds like a great idea, but then you'd miss all the posts about my kids!
那么他们如何处理这些数字? 他们创建了其他供稿,您可以订阅这些供稿来代替博客的主要供稿,以便仅阅读“大文章”或“热门内容”。 听起来是个好主意,但您会错过所有有关我的孩子的信息!
Here is one of their active widgets showing me the percentage of my posts that don't suck (so say their metrics. ;) )
这是他们的一个活跃小部件,向我展示了我的帖子中不吸引人的百分比(例如,他们的指标。;))
Check it out. (Yes, "well recieved" is incorrectly spelled in their Javascript widget. If it's not anymore, it's because they fixed it.)
看看这个。 (是的,“接收良好”在其Javascript小部件中的拼写错误。如果不再存在,那是因为他们已将其修复。)
翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/aiderss-now-things-are-getting-smarter