你们开发测试团队多少人_你们中有些人可能已经看到

你们开发测试团队多少人

As some of you may have seen, a draft version of the WS-I Basic Profile has been released (http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2002-10/BasicProfile-1.0-WGD.htm).  There has been some interesting commentary so far, and for those of you interested I encourage you to read up.  Strangely enough, the profile supports RPC/Literal but not RPC/Encoded.  I’ve been lobbying for dropping RPC/Lit as well, since there’s so little tool support out there for this mode and there’s really no reason to not just use Doc/Lit if you are going to use literal (XML schema-based) encoding of types. [Chris Brooks - Corillian CTO]

正如您中某些人所看到的那样，已经发布了WS-I基本概要文件的草案版本( http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2002-10/BasicProfile-1.0-WGD.htm ) 。 到目前为止，已经有一些有趣的评论，对于那些感兴趣的人，我鼓励您阅读。 奇怪的是，配置文件支持RPC / Literal，但不支持RPC / Encoded。 我也一直在游说删除RPC / Lit，因为这种模式对工具的支持很少，而且如果您要使用文字，那么确实没有理由不仅仅使用Doc / Lit。 (基于XML模式)类型的编码。 [ Chris Brooks - Corillian CTO]

• http://www.fawcette.com/xmlmag/2002_10/online/webservices_rjennings_10_21_02/

  http://www.fawcette.com/xmlmag/2002_10/online/webservices_rjennings_10_21_02/

• http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-basicprof.html

  http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-basicprof.html

• http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2002-10-18-c.html

  http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2002-10-18-c.html

翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/as-some-of-you-may-have-seen-a

你们开发测试团队多少人