srand/rand随机数生成

最新推荐文章于 2024-10-29 08:09:42 发布

fengbangyue

最新推荐文章于 2024-10-29 08:09:42 发布

阅读量832

点赞数

分类专栏： C/C++ 文章标签：测试

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/fengbangyue/article/details/7648375

版权

C/C++ 专栏收录该内容

35 篇文章 0 订阅

订阅专栏

网上都说(int)(rand()*N/(RAND_MAX+1.0))产生的随机数比(int)(rand()%N)更随机，但是好像前者产生随机数的奇偶性
不怎么样，下面是我测试N=2是,产生随机数的结果。
测试代码如下,不知道为什么，当Sleep为5000的时候(rand()*N/(RAND_MAX+1.0))生成的随机数就是0101010101的，总的来说，
(int)(rand()%N)产生的随机数让我找不到规律，(rand()*N/(RAND_MAX+1.0))产生的总是几个挨在一起的就一样，出来我设置
Sleep(5000)的时候变成101010，但这个也是规律的。对于随机数来说是不是说(int)(rand()%N)更稳定些呢，简单记录一下。
for (int ii = 0;ii < 1000;++ii)
{
srand((unsigned)GetCurrentTime());
//int tmp=(int)(rand()*2/(RAND_MAX+1.0));
int tmp = (int)(rand()%2);
std::cout<<tmp<<" ";
Sleep(10000);
}

int tmp=(int)(rand()*2/(RAND_MAX+1.0)); 1000ms
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1

int tmp = (int)(rand()%2); 1000ms
1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1

int tmp=(int)(rand()*2/(RAND_MAX+1.0)); 10000ms
1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1

int tmp = (int)(rand()%2); 10000ms
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0