读《On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems》

本文介绍了阅读哥德尔的《On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems》的经验,强调了理解文章的挑战,如哥德尔使用的数学符号和假定的读者知识水平。建议采用先粗读再精读的方法,花费更多时间来消化内容,并指出阅读此类经典文章的长期价值。在专家指导下或与他人讨论能提升阅读效果。
摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

读《On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems》

 

A formula is a finite sequence of natural numbers, and a proof is a finite sequence of finite sequences of natural numbers.
formulas are sequences of natural numbers -> expressible in PM
class-sign: a formula of PM with exactly one free variable of type natural numbers
K = {n belongs IN | not provable(R n(n))}
K is the set of numbers where the formla R n(n) that you get when you insert n into its own formula R n is improvable.
for a speci c natural number q. We will now prove that the theorem Rq(q) is
undecidable within PM. We can understand this by simply plugging in the de nitions:
Rq(q) , S(q) , q 2 K , :prov
  • 0
    点赞
  • 1
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值