Choreographer 是 Android 4.1 google的黄油计划新增的机制，用于配合系统的 VSYNC 中断信号。其主要用途是接收系统的 VSYNC 信号，统一管理应用的输入、动画和绘制等任务的执行时机。也就是(CALLBACK_INPUT,CALLBACK_ANIMATION,CALLBACK_TRAVERSAL,CALLBACK_COMMIT)，而我们主要的用途就是来查看app的帧率情况，下面来具体分析下这个神秘的类
当我们进行invalidate或者requestLayout时，总会执行viewRootImp的scheduleTraversals方法
void scheduleTraversals() {
if (!mTraversalScheduled) {
mTraversalScheduled = true;
mTraversalBarrier = mHandler.getLooper().getQueue().postSyncBarrier();
mChoreographer.postCallback(
Choreographer.CALLBACK_TRAVERSAL, mTraversalRunnable, null);
if (!mUnbufferedInputDispatch) {
scheduleConsumeBatchedInput();
}
notifyRendererOfFramePending();
pokeDrawLockIfNeeded();
}
}
而这个mTraversalRunnable就是我们所要执行的任务了，那究竟是何时执行呢？
首先会mChoreographer.postCallback会间接调用postCallbackDelayedInternal方法
private void postCallbackDelayedInternal(int callbackType,
Object action, Object token, long delayMillis) {
if (DEBUG_FRAMES) {
Log.d(TAG, "PostCallback: type=" + callbackType
+ ", action=" + action + ", token=" + token
+ ", delayMillis=" + delayMillis);
}
synchronized (mLock) {
final long now = SystemClock.uptimeMillis();
final long dueTime = now + delayMillis;
mCallbackQueues[callbackType].addCallbackLocked(dueTime, action, token);
if (dueTime <= now) {
scheduleFrameLocked(now);
} else {
Message msg = mHandler.obtainMessage(MSG_DO_SCHEDULE_CALLBACK, action);
msg.arg1 = callbackType;
msg.setAsynchronous(true);
mHandler.sendMessageAtTime(msg, dueTime);
}
}
}
我们可以看到正常情况下会执行scheduleFrameLocked方法
private void scheduleFrameLocked(long now) {
if (!mFrameScheduled) {
mFrameScheduled = true;
if (USE_VSYNC) {
if (DEBUG_FRAMES) {
Log.d(TAG, "Scheduling next frame on vsync.");
}
// If running on the Looper thread, then schedule the vsync immediately,
// otherwise post a message to schedule the vsync from the UI thread
// as soon as possible.
if (isRunningOnLooperThreadLocked()) {
scheduleVsyncLocked();
} else {
Message msg = mHandler.obtainMessage(MSG_DO_SCHEDULE_VSYNC);
msg.setAsynchronous(true);
mHandler.sendMessageAtFrontOfQueue(msg);
}
} else {
final long nextFrameTime = Math.max(
mLastFrameTimeNanos / TimeUtils.NANOS_PER_MS + sFrameDelay, now);
if (DEBUG_FRAMES) {
Log.d(TAG, "Scheduling next frame in " + (nextFrameTime - now) + " ms.");
}
Message msg = mHandler.obtainMessage(MSG_DO_FRAME);
msg.setAsynchronous(true);
mHandler.sendMessageAtTime(msg, nextFrameTime);
}
}
}
由于在4.1上是使用VSYNC信号的，所以就自然会调用scheduleVsyncLocked方法,会间接调用scheduleVsync方法
**
* Schedules a single vertical sync pulse to be delivered when the next
* display frame begins.
*/
public void scheduleVsync() {
if (mReceiverPtr == 0) {
Log.w(TAG, "Attempted to schedule a vertical sync pulse but the display event "
+ "receiver has already been disposed.");
} else {
nativeScheduleVsync(mReceiverPtr);
}
}
注意：这里的注释说的很清楚了，当下一帧来临时准备一个要分发的垂直同步信号，啥意思呢？简单来说就是当调用了nativeScheduleVsync方法时，当屏幕需要刷新的时候，也就是每隔16.6ms会通过native的looper分发到java层，从而调用java的方法，那是哪个方法呢？
// Called from native code.
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
private void dispatchVsync(long timestampNanos, int builtInDisplayId, int frame) {
onVsync(timestampNanos, builtInDisplayId, frame);
}
很明显是此方法
举个例子，比如屏幕显示的是第一帧，你在第一帧调用invalidate，其实并不是立即刷新的，而是在一帧会去注册一个Vsync(前提是这一帧cpu空闲情况下)，当下一帧来临时也就是第二帧的时候会调用dispatchVsync此方法，当然这是一种比较简单的情况，复杂的等会说
那么来看一下调用的onVsync方法
public void onVsync(long timestampNanos, int builtInDisplayId, int frame) {
// Ignore vsync from secondary display.
// This can be problematic because the call to scheduleVsync() is a one-shot.
// We need to ensure that we will still receive the vsync from the primary
// display which is the one we really care about. Ideally we should schedule
// vsync for a particular display.
// At this time Surface Flinger won't send us vsyncs for secondary displays
// but that could change in the future so let's log a message to help us remember
// that we need to fix this.
if (builtInDisplayId != SurfaceControl.BUILT_IN_DISPLAY_ID_MAIN) {
Log.d(TAG, "Received vsync from secondary display, but we don't support "
+ "this case yet. Choreographer needs a way to explicitly request "
+ "vsync for a specific display to ensure it doesn't lose track "
+ "of its scheduled vsync.");
scheduleVsync();
return;
}
// Post the vsync event to the Handler.
// The idea is to prevent incoming vsync events from completely starving
// the message queue. If there are no messages in the queue with timestamps
// earlier than the frame time, then the vsync event will be processed immediately.
// Otherwise, messages that predate the vsync event will be handled first.
long now = System.nanoTime();
if (timestampNanos > now) {
Log.w(TAG, "Frame time is " + ((timestampNanos - now) * 0.000001f)
+ " ms in the future! Check that graphics HAL is generating vsync "
+ "timestamps using the correct timebase.");
timestampNanos = now;
}
if (mHavePendingVsync) {
Log.w(TAG, "Already have a pending vsync event. There should only be "
+ "one at a time.");
} else {
mHavePendingVsync = true;
}
mTimestampNanos = timestampNanos;
mFrame = frame;
Message msg = Message.obtain(mHandler, this);
msg.setAsynchronous(true);
mHandler.sendMessageAtTime(msg, timestampNanos / TimeUtils.NANOS_PER_MS);
}
注意看下timestampNanos的参数（简单来说就是从调用native方法以后到回调到这个方法所经过的的时间）
接着看会发送一条异步消息，简单来说就是此消息在消息队列中不用排队，可以最先被取出来，很明显，会调用下面的run方法进行处理
@Override
public void run() {
mHavePendingVsync = false;
doFrame(mTimestampNanos, mFrame);
}
这里调用的doframe方法
void doFrame(long frameTimeNanos, int frame) {
final long startNanos;
synchronized (mLock) {
if (!mFrameScheduled) {
return; // no work to do
}
if (DEBUG_JANK && mDebugPrintNextFrameTimeDelta) {
mDebugPrintNextFrameTimeDelta = false;
Log.d(TAG, "Frame time delta: "
+ ((frameTimeNanos - mLastFrameTimeNanos) * 0.000001f) + " ms");
}
long intendedFrameTimeNanos = frameTimeNanos;
startNanos = System.nanoTime();
final long jitterNanos = startNanos - frameTimeNanos;
if (jitterNanos >= mFrameIntervalNanos) {
final long skippedFrames = jitterNanos / mFrameIntervalNanos;
if (skippedFrames >= SKIPPED_FRAME_WARNING_LIMIT) {
Log.i(TAG, "Skipped " + skippedFrames + " frames! "
+ "The application may be doing too much work on its main thread.");
}
final long lastFrameOffset = jitterNanos % mFrameIntervalNanos;
if (DEBUG_JANK) {
Log.d(TAG, "Missed vsync by " + (jitterNanos * 0.000001f) + " ms "
+ "which is more than the frame interval of "
+ (mFrameIntervalNanos * 0.000001f) + " ms! "
+ "Skipping " + skippedFrames + " frames and setting frame "
+ "time to " + (lastFrameOffset * 0.000001f) + " ms in the past.");
}
frameTimeNanos = startNanos - lastFrameOffset;
}
if (frameTimeNanos < mLastFrameTimeNanos) {
if (DEBUG_JANK) {
Log.d(TAG, "Frame time appears to be going backwards. May be due to a "
+ "previously skipped frame. Waiting for next vsync.");
}
scheduleVsyncLocked();
return;
}
if (mFPSDivisor > 1) {
long timeSinceVsync = frameTimeNanos - mLastFrameTimeNanos;
if (timeSinceVsync < (mFrameIntervalNanos * mFPSDivisor) && timeSinceVsync > 0) {
scheduleVsyncLocked();
return;
}
}
mFrameInfo.setVsync(intendedFrameTimeNanos, frameTimeNanos);
mFrameScheduled = false;
mLastFrameTimeNanos = frameTimeNanos;
}
try {
Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_VIEW, "Choreographer#doFrame");
AnimationUtils.lockAnimationClock(frameTimeNanos / TimeUtils.NANOS_PER_MS);
mFrameInfo.markInputHandlingStart();
doCallbacks(Choreographer.CALLBACK_INPUT, frameTimeNanos);
mFrameInfo.markAnimationsStart();
doCallbacks(Choreographer.CALLBACK_ANIMATION, frameTimeNanos);
mFrameInfo.markPerformTraversalsStart();
doCallbacks(Choreographer.CALLBACK_TRAVERSAL, frameTimeNanos);
doCallbacks(Choreographer.CALLBACK_COMMIT, frameTimeNanos);
} finally {
AnimationUtils.unlockAnimationClock();
Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_VIEW);
}
if (DEBUG_FRAMES) {
final long endNanos = System.nanoTime();
Log.d(TAG, "Frame " + frame + ": Finished, took "
+ (endNanos - startNanos) * 0.000001f + " ms, latency "
+ (startNanos - frameTimeNanos) * 0.000001f + " ms.");
}
}
有几个重点的地方要说下，我们开发时偶尔在log上会看到Skipped " + skippedFrames + " frames! "
+ "The application may be doing too much work on its main thread."这句话，很多人以为出现这句话是因为ui线程太耗时了，其实仔细想想就知道是错的，因为在回掉这方法的时候根本没有执行到
测量，绘制等，它的两个时间对比的是回掉到此帧的时间frameTimeNanos和当前的时间，如果大于16.66ms就会打印这句话，那就是说执行native方法到onFrame回掉超过16.66ms，而onFrame回掉是通过异步消息，可以忽略不计，那唯一可能出现的情况就是通过handler后执行dispatchVsync方法，与执行native方法的耗时，也就是说此时会有多个message，而执行dispatchVsync方法的message是排在比较后面的，这也解释了这句log：he application may be doing too much work on its main thread.
所以这句话并不能判断是ui卡顿了，只能说明有很多message，要减少不必要的message才是优化的根本。
而frameTimeNanos = startNanos - lastFrameOffset;简单来说就是给vsnc设置帧数的偏移量
那又是啥意思呢？
比如我在第一帧发起了重绘制，按理来说第二帧就会收到Vsync的信号值，但是由于message阻塞了超过了16.66，所以收到Vsync的信号自然延续要了第三帧。
在了解这句话以后，接下来就是回调绘制，或者input事件了，可以看到代码会间接调用doCallbacks
void doCallbacks(int callbackType, long frameTimeNanos) {
CallbackRecord callbacks;
synchronized (mLock) {
// We use "now" to determine when callbacks become due because it's possible
// for earlier processing phases in a frame to post callbacks that should run
// in a following phase, such as an input event that causes an animation to start.
final long now = System.nanoTime();
callbacks = mCallbackQueues[callbackType].extractDueCallbacksLocked(
now / TimeUtils.NANOS_PER_MS);
if (callbacks == null) {
return;
}
mCallbacksRunning = true;
// Update the frame time if necessary when committing the frame.
// We only update the frame time if we are more than 2 frames late reaching
// the commit phase. This ensures that the frame time which is observed by the
// callbacks will always increase from one frame to the next and never repeat.
// We never want the next frame's starting frame time to end up being less than
// or equal to the previous frame's commit frame time. Keep in mind that the
// next frame has most likely already been scheduled by now so we play it
// safe by ensuring the commit time is always at least one frame behind.
if (callbackType == Choreographer.CALLBACK_COMMIT) {
final long jitterNanos = now - frameTimeNanos;
Trace.traceCounter(Trace.TRACE_TAG_VIEW, "jitterNanos", (int) jitterNanos);
if (jitterNanos >= 2 * mFrameIntervalNanos) {
final long lastFrameOffset = jitterNanos % mFrameIntervalNanos
+ mFrameIntervalNanos;
if (DEBUG_JANK) {
Log.d(TAG, "Commit callback delayed by " + (jitterNanos * 0.000001f)
+ " ms which is more than twice the frame interval of "
+ (mFrameIntervalNanos * 0.000001f) + " ms! "
+ "Setting frame time to " + (lastFrameOffset * 0.000001f)
+ " ms in the past.");
mDebugPrintNextFrameTimeDelta = true;
}
frameTimeNanos = now - lastFrameOffset;
mLastFrameTimeNanos = frameTimeNanos;
}
}
}
try {
Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_VIEW, CALLBACK_TRACE_TITLES[callbackType]);
for (CallbackRecord c = callbacks; c != null; c = c.next) {
if (DEBUG_FRAMES) {
Log.d(TAG, "RunCallback: type=" + callbackType
+ ", action=" + c.action + ", token=" + c.token
+ ", latencyMillis=" + (SystemClock.uptimeMillis() - c.dueTime));
}
c.run(frameTimeNanos);
}
} finally {
synchronized (mLock) {
mCallbacksRunning = false;
do {
final CallbackRecord next = callbacks.next;
recycleCallbackLocked(callbacks);
callbacks = next;
} while (callbacks != null);
}
Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_VIEW);
}
}
从而执行 c.run(frameTimeNanos);方法进行回调
这里放张图，大家可以理解一下
简单说下
一开始注册了vsync信号，所以在下一帧调用了dispatchVsync方法，由于没有message阻塞，所以接收到了此帧的信号，进行了绘制，在绘制完成后又注册了信号，可以看到一帧内注册同一信号是无效的，但是回掉会执行，到了下一帧，由于message的超时不到16.66ms，所以也就是执行dispatchVsync与执行native方法的间隔时间，所以还是此帧还是有信号的，而由于此帧耗时超过了一帧，所以没有注册Vsync，当然也不会执行dispatchVsync方法，到了最后可以看到由于message超过了16.66即使在第三帧注册了Vsync信号，但是dispatchVsync执行的事件已经到了第5帧
卡顿优化
在简单分析完了Choreographer机制以后，来具体说下卡顿优化的两种方案的原理
1、 利用UI线程的Looper打印的日志匹配；
2、 使用Choreographer.FrameCallback
第一种是blockcanary的原理，就是利用looper.loop分发事件的时间间隔作为卡顿的依据
public static void loop() {
final Looper me = myLooper();
if (me == null) {
throw new RuntimeException("No Looper; Looper.prepare() wasn't called on this thread.");
}
final MessageQueue queue = me.mQueue;
// Make sure the identity of this thread is that of the local process,
// and keep track of what that identity token actually is.
Binder.clearCallingIdentity();
final long ident = Binder.clearCallingIdentity();
// Allow overriding a threshold with a system prop. e.g.
// adb shell 'setprop log.looper.1000.main.slow 1 && stop && start'
final int thresholdOverride =
SystemProperties.getInt("log.looper."
+ Process.myUid() + "."
+ Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ ".slow", 0);
boolean slowDeliveryDetected = false;
for (;;) {
Message msg = queue.next(); // might block
if (msg == null) {
// No message indicates that the message queue is quitting.
return;
}
// This must be in a local variable, in case a UI event sets the logger
final Printer logging = me.mLogging;
if (logging != null) {
logging.println(">>>>> Dispatching to " + msg.target + " " +
msg.callback + ": " + msg.what);
}
final long traceTag = me.mTraceTag;
long slowDispatchThresholdMs = me.mSlowDispatchThresholdMs;
long slowDeliveryThresholdMs = me.mSlowDeliveryThresholdMs;
if (thresholdOverride > 0) {
slowDispatchThresholdMs = thresholdOverride;
slowDeliveryThresholdMs = thresholdOverride;
}
final boolean logSlowDelivery = (slowDeliveryThresholdMs > 0) && (msg.when > 0);
final boolean logSlowDispatch = (slowDispatchThresholdMs > 0);
final boolean needStartTime = logSlowDelivery || logSlowDispatch;
final boolean needEndTime = logSlowDispatch;
if (traceTag != 0 && Trace.isTagEnabled(traceTag)) {
Trace.traceBegin(traceTag, msg.target.getTraceName(msg));
}
final long dispatchStart = needStartTime ? SystemClock.uptimeMillis() : 0;
final long dispatchEnd;
try {
msg.target.dispatchMessage(msg);
dispatchEnd = needEndTime ? SystemClock.uptimeMillis() : 0;
} finally {
if (traceTag != 0) {
Trace.traceEnd(traceTag);
}
}
if (logSlowDelivery) {
if (slowDeliveryDetected) {
if ((dispatchStart - msg.when) <= 10) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Drained");
slowDeliveryDetected = false;
}
} else {
if (showSlowLog(slowDeliveryThresholdMs, msg.when, dispatchStart, "delivery",
msg)) {
// Once we write a slow delivery log, suppress until the queue drains.
slowDeliveryDetected = true;
}
}
}
if (logSlowDispatch) {
showSlowLog(slowDispatchThresholdMs, dispatchStart, dispatchEnd, "dispatch", msg);
}
if (logging != null) {
logging.println("<<<<< Finished to " + msg.target + " " + msg.callback);
}
...
也就是对logging进行深入的研究，一般超过了1000ms就认为卡顿了，但我们有没有想过，我们通常说的卡顿不是说超过了16.66ms么，为何这里要超过500ms,甚至1000ms才算是卡顿？
我们要知道，android系统所有的执行都是基于looper机制的，也就是所有的消息执行的时间超过1000ms就认定卡顿了，举个例子，我们可能在主线程操作数据库，可能在主线程解析json，可能在主线程写文件，可能在主线程做一些例如高斯模糊的耗时操作
这种情况下我们利用blockcanary是可以检测出来的，但是如果是卡顿呢？当然我们也可以把时间设定为50ms，但是检测出来的太多了，所以就需要第二个机制了Choreographer.FrameCallback,通常这样写
public class BlockDetectByChoreographer {
public static void start() {
Choreographer.getInstance().postFrameCallback(new Choreographer.FrameCallback() {
long lastFrameTimeNanos = 0;
long currentFrameTimeNanos = 0;
@Override
public void doFrame(long frameTimeNanos) {
if(lastFrameTimeNanos == 0){
lastFrameTimeNanos == frameTimeNanos;
}
currentFrameTimeNanos = frameTimeNanos;
long diffMs = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.convert(currentFrameTimeNanos-lastFrameTimeNanos, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
if (diffMs > 16.6f) {
long droppedCount = (int)diffMs / 16.6;
}
if (LogMonitor.getInstance().isMonitor()) {
LogMonitor.getInstance().removeMonitor();
}
LogMonitor.getInstance().startMonitor();
Choreographer.getInstance().postFrameCallback(this);
}
});
}
}
我们可以看到调用了postFrameCallback方法，会间接调用postFrameCallbackDelayed
public void postFrameCallbackDelayed(FrameCallback callback, long delayMillis) {
if (callback == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("callback must not be null");
}
postCallbackDelayedInternal(CALLBACK_ANIMATION,
callback, FRAME_CALLBACK_TOKEN, delayMillis);
}
可以看到这里是CALLBACK_ANIMATION的callback，也就说只要监听了此方法他就会不断的调用doFrame，在doframe里调用postFrameCallback，从而来达到完美的监听ui卡顿的效果
也就是onMeasure,onLayout,onDraw的耗时时间
272
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
