20230208英语学习

一项新研究发现,美甲沙龙中使用的紫外线(UV)指甲烘干机可能会对我们的手部DNA造成伤害。虽然之前的研究在人口层面上未发现美甲干燥机与皮肤癌之间的关联,但分子层面的新研究揭示了令人担忧的结果。实验显示,紫外线可以以类似的方式损害人类和小鼠细胞的DNA。研究人员呼吁进行长期流行病学研究,以评估这些机制是否转化为实际危害。担忧的消费者被建议在做美甲前涂抹防晒霜或戴手套。
摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

UV Nail Polish Dryers May Damage the DNA in Our Hands
研究发现:频繁美甲,会损伤手部DNA?

Ultraviolet (UV) rays are known to cause skin cancer at high exposures, and yet very little safety research has been done on the lamps used to dry nail polish in beauty salons.

Now a new study by researchers at the University of California San Diego and the University of Pittsburgh in the US has uncovered concerning evidence of the damage that this overlooked source of radiation could be causing to our hands.

LED nail polish dryers look like little tanning beds for your hands.They use UV light to cure and dry some types of nail polish quickly and cleanly.

The bulb on an LED nail polish dryer is less intense and has a different UV spectrum to a tanning bed, but the few rays it emits still easily penetrate the skin with unknown results.

While previous studies have shown little to no link between nail drying machines and skin cancer at a population level, a new study on the molecular side of things has turned up some concerning results.

Bioengineer and lead author Ludmil Alexandrov says before the study “there was zero molecular understanding of what these devices were doing to human cells.”

The experiment’s findings suggest UV light from nail lamps can damage the DNA of human and mice cells in similar ways.

When petri dishes of mouse and human cells were put inside a nail polish dryer for two 20-minute sessions (separated by an hour break), about 20 to 30 percent of the cells died.

Meanwhile, 20 minutes of exposure a day for three days back-to-back killed up to 70 percent of exposed cells.For a single manicure, a person sticks their fingers under UV light for about 10 minutes in total.The exposure in the current study was extreme by comparison.

Cells that remained after the total exposure period showed signs of DNA damage and mutations linked to skin cancer.

While these results do not provide direct evidence of increased cancer risk, they do indicate that an appreciable level of risk could be present.Exactly how often someone needs to visit a nail salon to put themselves in danger’s way remains to be determined.

Alexandrov and his colleagues are calling for proper long-term epidemiological studies to assess whether the mechanisms uncovered by the test translate into actual harm.

One of the members of Alexandrov’s lab and first author of the study, Maria Zhivagui, was so alarmed by the results, she decided to stop getting regular gel polish manicures.

“Once I saw the effect of radiation emitted by the gel polish drying device on cell death and that it actually mutates cells even after just one 20-minute session, I was surprised,” Zhivagui says.

Zhivagui is being extra cautious.To her, the possible risks outweigh the benefits.But that doesn’t mean everyone needs to stop getting gel polish manicures immediately.

The risk of developing cancer on the hands from UV nail lamps seems to be very low at a population level among those under the age of 65.Some researchers have interpreted these results as meaning “gel manicures have little to no carcinogenic risk.”

But the risk to the individual is something cancer scientists are not dismissing quite yet.

Concerned customers, they say, should slather up with sunscreen before their manicures.Either that or they should wear gloves with finger holes.

In 2009, two healthy women who got regular manicures and who had no family history of skin cancer, suddenly developed skin cancer on their hands.The two case studies prompted researchers to dig into the health risks of nail polish dryers further.

In 2013, researchers confirmed that the dose of UV radiation emitted by UV nail lamps was 4.2 times stronger than the Sun.The authors concluded that the high intensity of the exposure warranted further studies.

While these products are marketed as safe, the reality is that very little research has been done on their health risks, and case studies are not enough to prove cause and effect.

But researchers hired by product testing companies responded by saying there was no “cause for public alarm”.The dose of UV light used in a single nail painting session is trivial in the grand scheme of things, they argued.

  • 1
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 打赏
    打赏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

Haleine

你的鼓励将是我创作的最大动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值