Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
A
1.improve their confidence->speak in front of others require a lot of couragement and should overcome their nervious.
ie. Once i had to make a presentation, nervious, afraid of speaking in public-> practice more, overcome my thrill->deliver a successful speech.
2.benefit to university->student who are good at speaking can give better impression in the society->bring reputation to school.
ie. Jack ma, mastered speech, many well-known speaking in public->also thanks to his brave and take risk, made him succcessful in his own business->lead to his university's high reputation,HangZhou normal university.
3.take public speaking courses sometimes can destroy students' courage; have no meaning for those are not intersted in speech, such as scientist, artist, wokers. From this aspect, school would let students choose what topic they prefer to talk in public. The advantages always overwhelm disadvantages.
The university has provided student who are going to enter university with two summer vocation grograms. Which one do you think is better for students?
1) take some college courses in advance. e.g. some courses that are related to students' major.
2) visit some history museums or historical relics.
1. have more interested when entering university->take course provide their background knowledge about their own major->learn major knowledge in advance can leave a deep impression to students about their area and inspire their interest and curiosity.
ie:a survey conducted by Oxford university, 70 percent of students would like to learn course before.
2.accomodate new enviorment-> taking course let them meet many similiar students and can experience university life in advance; during that time, if somebody feel uncomfortable, there are plenty time for him to adjust his own living habit or even choose another school before entering college.
ie: once I have a summer vocation, live in the Peking university; taking course with future teacher;living in the dormitory;cooperate with classmates; all of that make me feel pleasant-> think i made a right choice; leaving a good impression-> eager to study in this university, increase my passion to academic->good grade.
third
1.it efficient to bet copying compare to others->those works need kids own thought to finish and if they want to copy, there is no possibility.since it can be more difficult to adopt others' work than copy.
ie: 对比例子can not copy, like writing essay, drawing pictures; require own ideas,can not be the same work;at the same time, alter others' work need a lot of energy and time which are not worthy;while if some work like math problem, can be copied in a short time, it will lead to copying, and others method can not deal with that, for the reason that signal are easiliy to copy and punish seems unjustified for teachers .
2.It will not produce negative effect.this method make children do homework from their inner not from outside force. When putting into outside stress, maybe under some situation those methods can into effect. yet, too much pressure make kids feel unwilling, even disgust about this subject.
ie: survey state that when kids are exposed to their teacher or parents' stress, their would behavior worse than those who are willing to do homework without other outside factors.
3.admittedly, some disad, such as too tough to solve, spend a lot of time, lose heart towards this subject. But, considering to other two approaches' shortcoing. The ad always overwhelms disad.