我们在计算机方面滥用语言会永远唤醒我们

Computer ‘experts’ misuse our language because computers do not have the ability to function as these so-called ‘experts’ maintain.

计算机“专家”滥用了我们的语言，因为计算机没有像所谓的“专家”所维护的那样起作用。

初步评论 (Preliminary Comments)

In his interesting article, ‘Forget About Coding, The Job Of The Future Is Philosophy’, Luca Rossi defined intelligence as follows:

卢卡·罗西(Luca Rossi)在他有趣的文章“忘记编码，未来的工作是哲学”中，对智能的定义如下：

‘The ability to solve complex problems rapidly and efficiently.’

“快速有效地解决复杂问题的能力。”

However, Rossi was mistaken because intelligence is a faculty, not an ability. Nor is intelligence your ‘disfaculty’ you call your ‘intellect’ because the intellect only contains your disability of intellectualizing. I have coined the word, ‘disfaculty’, to describe the intellect.

然而，罗西被误认为是因为智力是一种才能，而不是一种能力。 智力也不是您的“精神错位”，您称您为“智力”，因为智力只包含您的智力障碍。 我创造了“ disfaculty”这个词来描述智力。

Unfortunately, philosophers have not realized that they have no word for the ability which your faculty of intelligence contains. As a result, I have had to invent this word. Consequently, I invented the word, ‘intelligizing’, to express the ability contained by your faculty of intelligence.

不幸的是，哲学家们还没有意识到他们对您的情报学院所具备的能力一无所知。 结果，我不得不发明这个词。 因此，我发明了“智能化”一词来表达您的情报学院所具有的能力。

Your faculty of intelligence is not your disfaculty of intellect because you mistakenly invented your disfaculty of intellect and your disability of intellectualizing with your ability of intelligizing because you used your ability of intelligizing to guide your ability of reasoning so that you could reason and invent your disfaculty of logic (your disfaculty of intellect) as well as invent your disability of ‘logicizing’ (your disfaculty of intellectualizing) in your logical (intellectual) disfaculty. Your disfaculty of intellect or logic is related to your disfaculty of cogitation; therefore, your disability of intellectualizing or logicizing is used by you to guide your disability of cogitating. Consequently, thinking and reasoning are abilities, while cogitating is a disability.

您的智力不是您的智力上的专长，因为您错误地发明了智力上的专长，并且您缺乏智力上的智能化能力，因为您使用了智力上的能力来指导自己的推理能力，因此您可以推理和发明自己的理论上的缺陷。逻辑(您的智力不称职)，以及在逻辑(智力)不称职中发明“逻辑化”(您的智力不当)的障碍。 您的智力或逻辑能力与您的认知能力有关； 因此，您会使用自己的智力或逻辑能力障碍来指导自己的思维障碍。 因此，思考和推理是能力，而交往则是残疾。

You use your disability of intellectualizing to guide your disability of cogitating. Your intellectualizing is based on the cogitating you do with the logical laws you use to govern your use of language.

您可以利用智力上的障碍来指导自己的思维上的障碍。 您的智能化基于您对用来控制语言使用的逻辑法则的理解。

You use your ability of intelligizing to guide your ability of reasoning. Your intelligizing is based on the reasoning you do with your need to know which you choose to activate so that you are motivated to improvisationally infer with your use of language.

您可以利用自己的理解能力来指导自己的推理能力。 智能化是基于您所做的推理，即您需要知道选择激活哪个语言，以便激发您即席推断语言的使用。

You use your ability of intelligizing to solve complex problems rapidly and efficiently according to your choice of being motivated by your need to know what is needed, while you use your disability of intellectualizing in a problem by governing your disability of cogitating with intellectualized laws so that your rapid and efficient solving of a complex problem is filled with mistakes resulting from not knowing what is needed. You see, when you intellectualize, you don’t know that you don’t need these laws to govern your use of language because you don’t know that your choice of what you need determines the goal of your sentences.

您可以根据自己的选择，利用自己的理解能力快速而有效地解决复杂的问题，从而了解需要些什么，而您却可以通过控制与智力化的法律相处的障碍来解决问题的智力障碍，从而您快速而有效地解决了一个复杂的问题，这是由于不知道需要什么而导致的错误。 您会发现，当您进行智能化时，您并不知道不需要这些法律来控制语言的使用，因为您不知道自己所需要的选择决定了句子的目标。

A computer is just a machine; therefore, a computer cannot be built with faculties, disfaculties, abilities or disabilities which means that a computer cannot be built with a faculty of intelligence containing the ability of intelligizing nor built with a disfaculty of intellect containing the disability of intellectualizing. Consequently, a computer is not able to solve problems rapidly and efficiently by its use of reasoning in accord with its realistic needs as guided by its intelligizing or by its use of cogitating in discord with delusional laws as ‘controlled’ by its intellectualizing.

一台计算机就是一台机器。 因此，不能用能力，能力，残疾或能力来构建计算机，这意味着不能用具有智力能力的智力来构建计算机，也不能用具有智力障碍的智力来构建计算机。 因此，计算机无法根据其实际需求(根据其智能化指导)或根据其智能化所控制的“妄想法”使用混乱来快速有效地解决问题。

计算机无法运行； 计算机正常运行 (A Computer does not Function; a Computer is Functioned)

RPN from RPN在 Pixabay Pixabay上发布

A computer simply does not function because a computer does not have the ability to function its own mechanisms, just as a brain do not have the ability to organize its own processes. A computer is functioned by the electromagnetic power of the Source’s Power or the branches of the Source’s Will in the computer’s energy forms and particles. When a computer is not related to its power supply, the computer is not functioned; therefore it is obvious that the computer is reliant on electromagnetism to do its functioning for it.

计算机根本不起作用，因为计算机没有能力发挥自己的机制，就像大脑没有能力组织自己的过程一样。 计算机通过源的电源的电磁功率或源的意志在计算机的能量形式和粒子中的分支起作用。 当计算机与其电源无关时，计算机将无法运行； 因此，很明显，计算机依靠电磁来完成其功能。

A computer does not function nor does it function by intelligence because even the Source does not have the ability to intelligize, although the Source does have the archetypal faculty of intelligence which it transfers to you as your ectypal faculty of intelligence. You are able to develop your ability of intelligizing in your ectypal faculty of intelligence because you are an individual with the need to relate. The Source is not an individual, but contains all individuals, nor does the Source have a need to relate to the individuals it develops. Consequently, the Source does not have the ability to intelligize existing in Its archetypal faculty of intelligence because It does not need this ability.

尽管源计算机确实具有原型的智能系统，但它却作为原始的计算机系统智能系统转移给您，因此计算机甚至无法运行，也无法通过智能系统运行，因为即使源计算机也无法进行智能化。 因为您是一个需要联系的人，所以您能够发展自己在外派情报学院的理解能力。 源不是个人，而是包含所有个体，源也不需要与它发展的个体相关。 因此，源没有能力对其原型情报学院中现有的语言进行理解，因为它不需要此功能。

计算机“专家”对语言的滥用 (The Misuse of Language by Computer ‘Experts’)

Computer ‘experts’ misuse their language in describing computers which is demonstrated by their use of the phrase, ‘artificial intelligence’. The phrase, ‘artificial intelligence’ is a contradiction in terms, i.e., an oxymoron, because artifacts cannot be used to ‘construct’ a faculty of intelligence. An ectypal faculty of intelligence can only be developed in a psyche from the active potential of the Source’s archetypal intelligence by the Source’s instinctive use of Its Will to do so.

计算机“专家”在描述计算机时滥用了他们的语言，这通过使用“人工智能”一词得到证明。 术语“人工智能”在术语上是矛盾的，即矛盾的语气，因为人工制品不能用于“构建”智力学院。 只有源头本能地使用其意志来从源头原型智力的活跃潜能中发展出一种唯心主义的智力才能。

Computer ‘experts’ also misuse the terms, ‘discover’ and ‘perform’, as well as misuse the phrases, ‘computer learning’ or ‘machine learning’. Computer ‘experts’ do not realize that the phrases, ‘computer learning’ and ‘machine learning’, are oxymorons because a computer is not able to discover, perform, or learn.

计算机“专家”还误用了“发现”和“执行”这两个术语，并误用了“计算机学习”或“机器学习”这两个词。 计算机的“专家”没有意识到短语“计算机学习”和“机器学习”是矛盾的，因为计算机无法发现，执行或学习。

A computer does not discover how to perform tasks because a computer does not have the ability to discover or the ability to perform. Discovery requires intelligizing by a psyche. Because a computer does not have a psyche, the computer is not able to intelligize; therefore, it can’t discover either.

由于计算机没有发现能力或执行能力，因此计算机无法发现如何执行任务。 发现需要心灵的智慧。 因为计算机没有心理，所以计算机无法智能化； 因此，它也无法发现。

A performance is the execution of actions which a computer has no ability to do. The performances that accomplish tasks in a computer’s mechanisms are carried out by way of the Source’s use of Its power of electromagnetism in the computer.

性能是计算机无法执行的动作的执行。 通过源在计算机中使用电磁力来执行完成计算机机制任务的性能。

Computers do not learn from experience because computers do not have the ability to experience. Only psyches have the ability to experience, not physicalities, whether this physicality is a constructed computer of mechanisms which are functioned by the Source or a grown brain of neurons which are processed by their psyches with the help of the Source.

计算机无法从经验中学习，因为计算机没有经验的能力。 无论是物理构造的计算机，由来源发挥作用​​的机制，还是由成长的神经元大脑在其来源的帮助下进行处理，只有心理学家才具有体验能力，而没有物理能力。

Computers do not learn how to solve new problems without being programmed to do so because they must be programmed with data. The electromagnetism in a computer is used by the Source to generate a statistical model from the computer’s programming and, in turn, generate new algorithms to meet the new situation occurring around the computer’s sensors. There is no learning taking place, even incidentally, by the computer or by the Source because the Source is not intelligent. The Source is not intelligent, despite having Its faculty of intelligence because the Source has no ability to intelligize in Its faculty of Intelligence.

未经编程，计算机就不会学习如何解决新问题，因为计算机必须使用数据进行编程。 来源使用计算机中的电磁波从计算机的程序生成统计模型，然后生成新的算法来满足计算机传感器周围发生的新情况。 因为源不是智能的，所以计算机或源都不会进行学习，即使是偶然的情况也是如此。 尽管源具有智能能力，但源不是智能的，因为源无法对其智能能力进行理解。

Computers don’t automatically generate anything because automatic process is also an oxymoron. The phrase ‘automatic process’ is just as much an oxymoron as artificial intelligence and computer learning because automatism is delusionally believed by pseudo-scientists to be processing derived from the stasis of laws when processing can only derived from voluntarism which is the derivation of processing from an act of Will whether this act is developed by the Source’s use of Its Will or by a psyche’s use of the branches of the Source’s Will in tandem with the Source.

计算机不会自动生成任何东西，因为自动过程也是矛盾的。 术语“自动过程”与人工智能和计算机学习一样，是一种矛盾，因为伪科学家认为自动主义是从法律的停滞中衍生出来的加工，而加工只能从自愿主义中衍生出来，而自愿是加工过程的衍生。意志行为，无论该行为是源头对意志的使用还是心理对源头意志的分支与源头的结合而发展的。

A computer also does not have the ability to analyze or the disability to predict on the basis of analysis because a computer is not inhabited by a psyche who has the ability to analyze as well as the disability to predict. We are psyches who can analyze the data which has been generated in a computer and we can guess what might happen based on the variables demonstrated in the data which we have analyzed; however, we cannot predict what will happen because there is no written future which predetermines our happening, no past which determines our happening, and no present in which we freely happen. We continually and freely happen with Immediacy; therefore, there is no need for us to continually and freely happen in a present because we only need to happen with Immediacy in circumstances and situations which occur due to voluntarism, not automatism.

计算机也不具有分析能力或基于分析的预测能力，这是因为计算机没有被具有分析能力和预测能力的心理所占据。 我们是能够分析计算机中生成的数据的心智，并且我们可以根据所分析的数据中显示的变量来猜测可能发生的情况； 但是，我们无法预测会发生什么，因为没有书面的未来可以预先确定我们的事件，没有过去可以决定我们的事件，也没有可以自由发生的现在。 即时性使我们不断自由地发生； 因此，我们无需在当下连续不断地自由发生，因为我们只需要在由于自愿而不是自动发生的情况下立即进行。

We only continually happen according the Continuity of Immediacy which is the attribute of the Source, noumena, epinoumena, Energy, and the phenomena of Energy. Adding the eternity of the Now to the Continuity of Immediacy is, as the Zen masters say, like ‘adding legs to a snake’; it is an entirely unnecessary and delusional addition because eternity and the Now do not exist.

我们仅根据即刻连续性(Continuity of Immediacy)连续发生，连续性是源，努美纳，Epinoumena，能源和能源现象的属性。 正如禅宗大师所说的那样，将立即的永恒性添加到即时性的连续性中，就像“在蛇中增加腿”。 这是完全不必要和妄想的添加，因为永恒和现在不存在。

Happening is not determined by the past, predetermined by the future, or freely determined in the present because temporality is a delusion. You can freely and intentionally guide who and how you will be as you immediately happen and continue to happen, but what will happen is also the result of circumstances generated freely and intentionally in situations by other people as well as generated freely, but unintentionally, in these situations by the Source. Consequently, happening can never be predicted by us, but can only be that at which we guess.

发生不是由过去来决定的，不是由未来来决定的，还是由现在来自由决定的，因为时间是一种妄想。 您可以自由地，有意地指导您，在即将发生并继续发生的情况下，您将成为谁以及如何成为自己，但是将发生的情况也是由他人在有意情况下自由有意产生的情况以及在无意中无意中产生的情况的结果。这些情况由消息来源提供。 因此，我们永远无法预测发生的事情，而只能是我们猜测的结果。

What will happen can be anticipated, realistically, but never expected, realistically, because expectation is the pretense that you know what will happen; however, anticipation is the knowledge that what might happen is likely to occur, but may not occur. This is why a new happening is a surprise to the truly awakened and wise (enlightened) individual.

将会发生的事情可以现实地预料到，但是从不现实地预料到，因为期望是您知道将要发生的事的伪装。 但是，预期是知道可能发生的事情可能会发生，但可能不会发生。 这就是为什么新发生的事情对于真正觉醒且明智的(开明的)个人而言是一个惊喜。

The wise person knows that there are no laws that we can use to predict what will happen because the Source instinctively and freely uses Its Will in accord with Its needs. We were instinctively and freely developed by the Source to use the branches of Its Will interlacing all noumena (everyone) developed from It, all the epinoumena (needs, sane desires, insane desires, abilities, and faculties) of noumena, as well as Energy and all the phenomena evolved and grown by the Source from Energy so that we are able to be in accord with our needs, sane desires, and insane desires that we let guide us or that we choose to use to guide us.

智者知道，没有任何法律可以用来预测将会发生的事情，因为信息源本能地，自由地根据其需求使用其意志。 源由我们本能地自由开发，使用其意志的分支交错从它发展而来的所有noumena(每个人)，noumena的所有Epinoumena(需求，理智的欲望，疯狂的欲望，能力和才能)以及能量以及源头从能源演变而来的所有现象，使我们能够满足我们的需要，理智的欲望和疯狂的欲望，我们可以指导我们，也可以选择用来指导我们。

科学主义，语言和醒来 (Scientism, Language, and Waking Up)

A computer ‘expert’s’ use of language to describe a computer as having abilities is the result of scientism. Pseudo-philosophers and pseudo-scientists who believe in scientism base their belief that their computers have abilities on their belief that their brains have abilities, rather than they have abilities, because they have mistaken their brains for what they are. Their belief that we are our brains is at the root of their scientism. These pseudo-philosophers and pseudo-scientists don’t realize that we cannot be our brains because we possess them. This is why we refer to our brains as ‘ours’.

计算机的“专家”对语言的描述将计算机描述为具有能力是科学主义的结果​​。 相信科学主义的伪哲学家和伪科学家基于其认为计算机具有能力的信念是基于他们的大脑具有能力而非能力的信念，因为他们将大脑误以为自己是什么。 他们相信我们是我们的大脑，这是他们科学主义的根源。 这些伪哲学家和伪科学家没有意识到我们不能成为我们的大脑，因为我们拥有它们。 这就是为什么我们将大脑称为“我们的”。

Photo from Pixabay (no attribution given to copy)

来自Pixabay的照片(未注明出处)

Computer ‘experts’ who believe in scientism have spread their misuse of language, worldwide, so that many laymen believe their delusional hypothesis that the computer and our brains have abilities, rather than us. These computer ‘experts’ are confined to ‘Plato’s Cave’ and are also reinforcing our tendency to remain there. Consequently, we are afraid to leave this ‘Cave’ and emerge into the light so that we awaken to the truth that computer ‘experts’ are all ‘talking through their hats’.

相信科学主义的计算机“专家”在世界范围内散布了对语言的滥用，因此许多外行人相信他们的妄想假设是计算机和我们的大脑而不是我们的能力。 这些计算机“专家”仅限于“柏拉图洞穴”，也加强了我们留在那儿的趋势。 因此，我们害怕离开这个“洞窟”而浮出水面，以至于我们意识到一个事实，即计算机“专家”们都在“自言自语”。

I often wonder if we will ever feel free enough to challenge the world-wide assumption that our computer ‘experts’ are intelligentsia, rather than are simply intellectuals, by realizing that our use of language is free because our use of language, while based on the facts or realities of our experience, is derived from our interpretation of the facts or realities we are experiencing. I do not know whether we will ever realize, as a community, that our abilities are not derived from physical laws (which is an oxymoron), but are derived from our needs, but I am doing my best to demonstrate that the ultimate Truth of computer ‘experts’ is faulty because I know I am absolutely free to think and reason according to my experience of my needs, sane desires, and insane desires, as well as other facts or realities existing in absolute Reality. Computer ‘experts’ have not emerged from Plato’s Cave, but this doesn’t mean that I haven’t. I have emerged from my sleep in stale air of Plato’s Cave to awake in the fresh air outside of this Cave.

我常常想知道我们是否会足够自由地挑战世界范围的假设，即我们的计算机“专家”是知识分子，而不是单纯的知识分子，因为我们意识到我们的语言使用是自由的，因为我们的语言使用是基于我们所经历的事实或现实，源于我们对所经历的事实或现实的解释。 我不知道作为一个社区，我们是否会认识到，我们的能力并非源自物理定律(这是矛盾的定律)，而是源自于我们的需求，但我正在尽力证明自己的最终真理。计算机“专家”是有缺陷的，因为我知道根据我对我的需求，理智的欲望和疯狂的欲望以及绝对现实中存在的其他事实或现实的经验，我绝对可以自由思考和推理。 柏拉图的洞穴里还没有出现计算机“专家”，但这并不意味着我没有。 我从睡眠中醒来，在柏拉图洞穴的陈旧空气中醒来，在这个洞穴外面的新鲜空气中苏醒。

But I often wonder, ‘Will we ever wake up as a community?’

但是我经常想知道，“我们是否会作为一个社区醒来？”

1. Rossi, L. 10 June 2020. ‘Forget About Coding, The Job Of The Future Is Philosophy’. Medium.com. Web. Accessed 14 Aug 2020.

1.罗西，湖，2020年6月10日。“忘记编码，未来的工作是哲学”。 Medium.com 。 网络。 于2020年8月14日访问。

翻译自: https://medium.com/the-innovation/our-misuse-of-language-in-regards-to-computers-will-we-ever-wake-up-as-a-community-f352b4146438