qimage 缩放失真_缩放级别错误如何导致设计反馈失真

qimage 缩放失真

I notice that many people (myself included) tend to create, observe, present, and critique designs in a zoomed out state. This can be the case when looking at work-in-progress designs in an application like Sketch or Figma — or even when looking at a mock-up that’s been printed out.

我注意到许多人(包括我自己)倾向于在缩小状态下创建，观察，呈现和评论设计。 在诸如Sketch或Figma之类的应用程序中查看进行中的设计时，甚至在查看已打印出的模型时，都可能会出现这种情况。

With a zoomed-out view, you can easily end up seeing twice the screen real estate or more compared to what users would typically see when using the product for real. This provides a better overview of the page, but can also skew perceptions of how well the design is working in a few subtle ways. Once you become consciously aware of these effects you may find that they actually come into play a surprising amount.

通过缩小视图，与实际使用产品时，用户通常可以看到的屏幕面积相比，您可以轻松地看到两倍的屏幕面积。 这提供了更好的页面概述，但也可能以几种微妙的方式歪曲人们对设计工作状况的看法。 一旦您意识到这些影响，您可能会发现它们实际上发挥了惊人的作用。

Here are a few problems you’ll come across when looking at a zoomed-out view:

在放大视图中会遇到以下一些问题：

1.个别要素脱颖而出 (1. Individual elements stand out less)

Because you can see more at once, individual elements will have to compete more fiercely to stand out among the other elements on the page. Consider the example in the image below. A stakeholder looking at the view on the left may think that the yellow button in the top right doesn’t stand out enough — even though it’s clearly the most prominent element when the view-port is seen at a more realistic size.

因为您可以一次看到更多内容，所以各个元素将必须更加激烈地竞争才能在页面上的其他元素中脱颖而出。 考虑下图中的示例。 利益相关者在看左边的视图时可能会认为，右上角的黄色按钮不够突出-尽管当以更实际的尺寸查看视口时，它显然是最突出的元素。