java中用sql语句where number=number+1_SQL查询以查找表中min_numbers和max_number之间的孔...

编辑：最终答案在底部.

为什么这么多sql问题忘记了表名？

-- Buggy: should reference (lo.max + 1)

SELECT lo.max + 1 AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE hi.min - (lo.max - 1) >= 40 -- Example won't work with 50

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example AS mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

NOT EXISTS子句至关重要-它确保您仅考虑相邻范围.

这涉及“差距足够大”的情况.

名义上,您可以使用UNION子句处理“没有足够大的间隙”：

...

UNION

SELECT MAX(max)+1

FROM example

WHERE NOT EXISTS(

SELECT lo.max + 1 AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE hi.min - (lo.max - 1) >= 40 -- Example won't work with 50

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example AS mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

)

内部SELECT是第一个缩进的直接转录.

上面的sql未经测试.第一部分工作(尤其是在测试数据上)-但是可以产生多个答案.因此,需要将其修订为(我认为,修正了二分之一错误)：

SELECT MIN(lo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE hi.min - (lo.max + 1) >= 40 -- Example won't work with 50

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example AS mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

UNION子句让我有些悲伤…没有产生我期望的答案.

在语法上,我必须将其修改为：

SELECT MIN(lo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE hi.min - (lo.max + 1) >= 40 -- Example won't work with 50

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example AS mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

UNION

SELECT MAX(solo.max)+1

FROM example AS solo

WHERE NOT EXISTS(

SELECT MIN(lo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE hi.min - (lo.max - 1) >= 40 -- Example won't work with 50

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example AS mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

)

这可以避免使用关键字MAX作为列名的问题(我可能写了example.max而不是solo.max.但是它并没有产生我期望的答案.

在这种情况下,UNION等效于OR,并且此查询似乎产生了我想要的答案：

SELECT MIN(lo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE (hi.min - (lo.max + 1) >= 40

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example AS mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

)

OR lo.max = (SELECT MAX(solo.max) FROM Example AS Solo)

;

至关重要的是,OR子句引用lo.max而不是hi.max.否则,您将得到错误的答案.

OK-UNION版本注定要失败,因为sql错误定义了MIN的行为.具体来说,如果没有匹配的行,则MIN返回值为NULL的一行,而不返回任何行.这意味着,在未找到任何行的情况下,UNION的第一子句将返回NULL.第二个子句可以通过在NOT EXISTS内部省略SELECT中的MIN来“固定”,但是您仍然从语句中得到两行(NULL和正确值),这实际上是不可接受的.因此,OR版本是要使用的版本-sql再次使用NULL值进行咬合.

可以通过在FROM子句中的表表达式中构造UNION来严格避免使用null.最终会变得稍微简单一些：

SELECT MIN(min_range)

FROM (SELECT (lo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE hi.min - (lo.max + 1) >= 49

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example AS mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

UNION

SELECT MAX(solo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example AS solo

);

UNION的前半部分可以返回任意数量的时隙,包括零；第二个总是返回一个值(只要表中有任何行).然后,外部查询选择这些值中的最低者.

当然,此版本可用于分配行：

INSERT INTO Example(min,max)

SELECT MIN(min_range) AS min,MIN(min_range) + (50 - 1) AS max

FROM (SELECT (lo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example lo,example hi

WHERE hi.min - (lo.max + 1) >= 50

AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM example mid

WHERE mid.min > lo.max

AND mid.max < hi.min

)

UNION

SELECT MAX(solo.max + 1) AS min_range

FROM example AS solo

);