kernel 中断分析五——irq_thread

前言

在x86 kernel 中断分析三——中断处理流程中，对于线程化中断处理函数，handle_irq_event_percpu调用了irq_wake_thread唤醒action->thread，此处唤醒的thread创建于__setup_irq，代码如下：

   947         t = kthread_create(irq_thread, new, "irq/%d-%s", irq,
   948                    new->name);
...
   962         new->thread = t;

本篇分析irq_thread。

irq_thread

参数data是新注册的irqaction

   832 /*
   833  * Interrupt handler thread
   834  */
   835 static int irq_thread(void *data)
   836 {
   837     struct callback_head on_exit_work;
   838     struct irqaction *action = data;
   839     struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(action->irq);
   840     irqreturn_t (*handler_fn)(struct irq_desc *desc,
   841             struct irqaction *action);
   842
   843     if (force_irqthreads && test_bit(IRQTF_FORCED_THREAD,---------1
   844                     &action->thread_flags))
   845         handler_fn = irq_forced_thread_fn;-----------------------1.1
   846     else
   847         handler_fn = irq_thread_fn;------------------------------1.2
   848
   849     init_task_work(&on_exit_work, irq_thread_dtor); ---------------2
   850     task_work_add(current, &on_exit_work, false); 
   851
   852     irq_thread_check_affinity(desc, action);-----------------------3
   853
   854     while (!irq_wait_for_interrupt(action)) {----------------------4
   855         irqreturn_t action_ret;
   856
   857         irq_thread_check_affinity(desc, action);
   858
   859         action_ret = handler_fn(desc, action);
   860         if (action_ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
   861             atomic_inc(&desc->threads_handled);
   862
   863         wake_threads_waitq(desc);--------------------------------5
   864     }
   865
   866     /*
   867      * This is the regular exit path. __free_irq() is stopping the
   868      * thread via kthread_stop() after calling
   869      * synchronize_irq(). So neither IRQTF_RUNTHREAD nor the
   870      * oneshot mask bit can be set. We cannot verify that as we
   871      * cannot touch the oneshot mask at this point anymore as
   872      * __setup_irq() might have given out currents thread_mask
   873      * again.