Programming / Languages / Comparison_and_Review
| ||
A Comparison of C++, FORTRAN 90 and Oberon-2 for Scientific Programming | ||
The report concludes by a personal assessment of the three languages with respect to the numerical context. By Bernd M枚sli. The reader's experience in scientific programming in C or FORTRAN would be advantageous. | ||
Table compares Java, Perl, Smalltalk, C++, C, Tcl, Shells (average). | ||
Annotated links to critiques (Older version, by original author) | ||
TOM attempts to address flaws in these languages: C++, Cecil, Common Lisp, Eiffel, Java, Objective-C, Smalltalk. | ||
By Tim Peters. | ||
Tom Christiansen compares Perl to other languages, and some of the others to yet others. | ||
Suite of common programming problems solved in Ada, C++, Erlang, Guile, Haskell, Java, Masd, merd, NASM, Objective Caml, Perl, Pliant, Python, Ruby, Tcl. | ||
Collection of self-reproducing programs: each outputs a copy of its own source code; about 60 languages. | ||
Many links to comparisons involving Python. | ||
Says Tcl is simpler, more maintainable, has superior GUI interface; Perl is hard to maintain and embed, thread unsafe, complex to learn. No code samples, tables, graphs. | ||
Compares Java and Dylan, with examples from building two CORBA IDL compilers. Topics include: multiple inheritance, multi-argument dispatch, unified object model, extensible syntax. Several code examples. | ||
#Also compares C#, Java, C++. By Ben Albahari. | ||
A comparison of two languages specialized for retrieving and parsing HTML pages. | ||
#Code for code comparison. All features on both languages are compared. | ||
Compares Ruby, Objective-C, Smalltalk-80, C++, Java, Python, CLOS, Perl5, PHP, Dylan. | ||
This document compares the languages Java and C++. HTML, PS and PDF formats. | ||
ROT13 implemented in many programming languages. | ||
Ruby vs Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, Eiffel, C++. Very short. | ||
Display time as English sentence, coded in: AWK, C, ICI, Icon, JavaScript, Lite/mSQL, PHP3, Pike, Python, REBOL, Rexx, Ruby, SLang, Spanner. Tested on only Linux (all) and AmigaOS (C and Rexx versions). | ||
A comparison of scripting language approaches in various categories. Pros and cons are given for each feature variation. | ||
Brian Kernighan's comparison of Pascal and C | ||
By Capers Jones, Chairman, Software Productivity Research, Inc. Huge table of function point evaluation values (how many code lines needed for a task) compares 500 languages, dialects, and/or implementations. | ||
Lists and compares about 20 languages. | ||
Guidelines for Choosing a Computer Language: Support for the Visionary Organizations | ||
Multipage study compares: 4GL/5GL, 3GL (Ada 95, C, C++, COBOL, FORTRAN, Java, Smalltalk), 2GL (Assembly). Divides language (definition) from traits of products that implement and support it. Several sections, tables, appendixes. | ||
Table graphic, uses good-fair-poor metric, compares Java, Smalltalk, Tcl, Perl, Shells, C, C++. | ||
Comprehensive, many references; zipped Postscript, inlined gifs. | ||
Similarities and Differences. From First Step Communications. | ||
Linea Engineering, Inc.: Getting The Biggest Bang For Your Buck | ||
Compares VisualGen, Smalltalk, C++/Java, ANSI COBOL 85. | ||
Each entry includes history, description, code examples, and references. | ||
Article by Stephen F. Zeigler. Analysis of a case where most variables were controlled enough to make a comparison between development costs (time, error rates, code size, ...) of the 2 languages. | ||
A critical view on the C++ and C programming language. [Postscript] | ||
Table, text, links compare Tcl, Perl, Python, JavaScript, Visual Basic. | ||
Is Turing a Better Language for Teaching Programming than Pascal? | ||
Compares Turing to Pascal, long text document, no tables or graphs; by Jacqueline L. Martin, 1996, many references. | ||
A small overview of the differences between Inferno/Limbo and JavaOS/Java. | ||
Some people think Java is like C++, but usual C++ idioms do not carry over to Java because Java is not a C++ superset or subset; Java is a derivation with many modifications, extensions. The language's syntax is alike, but semantics and philosophy is very | ||
Compares Ada95 to Fortran90 via code samples, text. Well reasoned and written, many examples. Finds Ada equal or better than Fortran in all aspects but one marginal trait. | ||
Compares 4 programming languages (Ada95, C, C++, Java) with the requirements of "Steelman", original 1978 requirements document for Ada language. Big detailed table. | ||
A collection of banchmarks performed on 24 different languages. Includes a tool to grade languages depending on how well they did on tests that matter for you. | ||
Programming guru, Robert Martin, on languages of the coming decade. | ||
List of the famous "Hello, World!" programming teaching program, in hundreds of different languages. | ||
Discusses historical move from low level languages to higher level interpreted ones, productivity, future developments. Active feedback response. [ZDNet News] | ||
Table-based comparison of 4 major OO languages: Eiffel, C++, Java, Smalltalk. Criteria chosen to suggest where Eiffel is better. | ||
Timing Trials, or, the Trials of Timing: Experiments with Scripting and User-Interface Languages | ||
By Brian Kernighan, Christopher Van Wyk. Compares how fast C, Awk, Perl, Tcl, Java, Visual Basic, Limbo, Scheme, run a range of representative tasks. Text, tables, graphs, code samples. | ||
Author explains what he considers wrong about Perl, presents Python as an alternative. Descriptions, code samples, links. | ||
Table compares popular object-oriented languages: Eiffel, Smalltalk, Ruby, Java, C++, Python, Perl, Visual Basic. | ||
Text descriptions compare C/C++, Java, Pascal, Basic, VeraStream; Oracle; HTML, XML; JavaScript, PHP. | ||
Comprehensive article by Dare Obasanjo, details most similarities and differences between the two languages: features Java has that C# doesn't, and features C# has that Java doesn't. Text, tables, code, resources. | ||
Operator names and syntax elements in various programming languages. | ||
Text treats general aspects of language choices, then compares hatred of Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, Java, C, C++, JavaScript, XSLT, SQL. With many forum comments. [ONLamp.com] | ||
Yes-No table with definitions compares D, C, C++, C#, Java, on: GC, functions, arrays, OOP, performance, reliability, compatibility, conditional compiling. [Digital Mars] | ||
Describes dozens of mostly living languages, grouped by family similarities. Most are alternatives to Microsoft. | ||
Compares colorForth and C: Chuck Moore, father of Forth, expects colorForth applications to need only 1% the code of C programs. No code samples. | ||
Book compares over 70 languages, and main classes: imperative, functional, object-oriented, dataflow, concurrent, declarative, aggregate. By Raphael Finkel, Addison-Wesley. | ||
Compares similarities and differences, by user of both languages. | ||
By Rene Grothmann. Compares sieve algorithm in Java and C/C++. Text, tables, live comparison applet. | ||
Compares Ada, Java, C, C++, Delphi. Text, tables. Gnat and Linux orientation. [Linux Gazette] | ||
Compares Ada, C, C++, language facilities under DOS. Copy of article in EXE magazine, May 1997, originally titled "Ada better than C++?" Text and code samples. | ||
Browse, explore some programming language's syntactic rules. See relations between rules, understand them using BNF (Backus-Naur Form notation) and syntactic diagrams: SQL, PL/SQL, SQL2, IDL; Ada95, Java, Modula-2; Lazy, LISP, M5. | ||
Links, and table comparing Ruby, Objective-C, Smalltalk-80 (old), SmallScript (Smalltalk-98 dialect), JavaScript 2.0 (ECMA Script), C#, C++, Java, Python, CLOS. | ||
By Jim Basney. May 1995. | ||
Monthly updated index that gives an indication of the popularity of programming languages. | ||
Tables and text compare Ada83, Ada95, C, C++; mainly costs, reliability. By Donald J. Reifer. [CrossTalk] | ||
By Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier. How to choose between two languages that are both very popular for Web development? Text, forum comments. [NewsFactor] | ||
By Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier. Text compares a few aspects of C#, Java, C++. [NewsFactor] | ||
A comparison of the features of and demand for some of the major programming languages. | ||
By John Dell'Aquila. Text description, no code samples, Ruby Garden FAQ entry from comp.lang.python post. | ||
Over 200 languages described, mostly original commentary, many deep insights, over 1,000 links. [Open Content] | ||
Detailed discussion of the techniques used in Java and C++ to implement leak free and exception safe resource management. Covers memory management, finalizers, destructors and finally blocks with examples. | ||
Two medium length documents compare object-oriented languages: Water with ConciseXML syntax, to JSP (JavaServer Pages) and Java; 1 brief list compares Water to PHP. | ||
Compares a few variables (size, speed, syntax) in many languages: Brain, C, Cel, F-Script, Forth (gForth, pForth), Icon, Java (Kaffe), Lisp (CLisp, Guile, LispMe, Scheme48), Lua, Perl, Pike, Python, Ruby, Self, Smalltalk (GNU, Squeak, SuperCollider), Tcl. | ||
Table and notes compare some elements of syntax of Java 1.1 to Smalltalk-80. | ||
Compares 129 (or 157?) languages, via 418 code samples, and growing. | ||
Table compares traits of DreamMaker, C/C++, Java/C#, Visual Basic, Assembly. | ||
Brief text compares 6 basic language types: general scripting, programmer scripting, application development, low-level, pure functional, complete core. | ||
Short text summary of main features of Oberon-2; target audience: Modula-2 programmers unfamiliar with Oberon-2, but familiar with object-oriented and extensible programming concepts. | ||
Brief comparison of major Linux programming languages C, C++, Fortran, Java, Lisp, Perl, PHP, Python, Tcl; by Risto S. Varanka. | ||
Brief comparison Curl with High Level assembler, BCX, Dark Basic, Mono (C#/.Net implementation), Python, Squeak, XBasic/XBlite. Curl applet examples. | ||
Nine Language Performance Round-up: Benchmarking Math & File I/O | ||
Small-scale benchmark test run on 9 languages or variants: Java 1.3.1 and 1.4.2, C via gcc 3.3.1, Python 2.3.2 and via Psyco 1.1.1, 4 from Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003: Visual Basic/C#/C++/J#. | ||
#A non-compartive critique of the C# language by the creator of the Heron language. | ||
Some points on language design by Keith Waclena. | ||
Shows source code implementation for the same simple program across over 250 different programming languages. | ||
Many comparisons between Tcl/Tk and other similar systems, most copied from comp.lang.tcl. | ||
General feature comparisons, explanations. | ||
An Empirical Comparison of C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, Rexx, and Tcl | ||
By Lutz Prechelt. Neutral, quantitative analysis of 7 languages in title, for 7 variables, via 80 implementations of the same requirement set. PDF format. [IEEE Computer] | ||
Compares Dylan, Smalltalk, Objective-C, C/C++. Long document. | ||
Visual Basic, VB.Net critiques in comparison with Delphi and C#. | ||
Interview with Dennis Ritchie, Bjarne Stroustrup, James Gosling. |
source: http://www.0stats.com/dir/Computers-12Programming-12Languages-12Comparison_and_Review.html