机器学习建模与评估
知识点：
- 数据集的划分
- 机器学习模型建模的三行代码
- 机器学习模型分类问题的评估
今日代码比较多，但是难度不大，仔细看看示例代码，好好理解下这几个评估指标。
作业：尝试对心脏病数据集采用机器学习模型建模和评估
import pandas as pd #用于数据处理和分析，可处理表格数据。
import numpy as np #用于数值计算，提供了高效的数组操作。
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt #用于绘制各种类型的图表
import seaborn as sns #基于matplotlib的高级绘图库，能绘制更美观的统计图形。
# 设置中文字体（解决中文显示问题）
plt.rcParams['font.sans-serif'] = ['SimHei'] # Windows系统常用黑体字体
plt.rcParams['axes.unicode_minus'] = False # 正常显示负号data = pd.read_csv('python60-days-challenge-master\heart.csv') #读取数据
print("数据基本信息：")
data.info()
print("\n数据前5行预览：")
print(data.head())
数据基本信息：
<class 'pandas.core.frame.DataFrame'>
RangeIndex: 303 entries, 0 to 302
Data columns (total 14 columns):
# Column Non-Null Count Dtype
--- ------ -------------- -----
0 age 303 non-null int64
1 sex 303 non-null int64
2 cp 303 non-null int64
3 trestbps 303 non-null int64
4 chol 303 non-null int64
5 fbs 303 non-null int64
6 restecg 303 non-null int64
7 thalach 303 non-null int64
8 exang 303 non-null int64
9 oldpeak 303 non-null float64
10 slope 303 non-null int64
11 ca 303 non-null int64
12 thal 303 non-null int64
13 target 303 non-null int64
dtypes: float64(1), int64(13)
memory usage: 33.3 KB
数据前5行预览：
age sex cp trestbps chol fbs restecg thalach exang oldpeak slope \
0 63 1 3 145 233 1 0 150 0 2.3 0
1 37 1 2 130 250 0 1 187 0 3.5 0
2 41 0 1 130 204 0 0 172 0 1.4 2
3 56 1 1 120 236 0 1 178 0 0.8 2
4 57 0 0 120 354 0 1 163 1 0.6 2
ca thal target
0 0 1 1
1 0 2 1
2 0 2 1
3 0 2 1
4 0 2 1 continuous_features = data.select_dtypes(include=['int64', 'float64']).columns.tolist() #把筛选出来的列名转换成列表
# 连续特征用中位数补全
for feature in continuous_features:
mode_value = data[feature].mode()[0] #获取该列的众数。
data[feature].fillna(mode_value, inplace=True) #用众数填充该列的缺失值，inplace=True表示直接在原数据上修改。
data.info() #查看数据基本信息
数据基本信息：
<class 'pandas.core.frame.DataFrame'>
RangeIndex: 303 entries, 0 to 302
Data columns (total 14 columns):
# Column Non-Null Count Dtype
--- ------ -------------- -----
0 age 303 non-null int64
1 sex 303 non-null int64
2 cp 303 non-null int64
3 trestbps 303 non-null int64
4 chol 303 non-null int64
5 fbs 303 non-null int64
6 restecg 303 non-null int64
7 thalach 303 non-null int64
8 exang 303 non-null int64
9 oldpeak 303 non-null float64
10 slope 303 non-null int64
11 ca 303 non-null int64
12 thal 303 non-null int64
13 target 303 non-null int64
dtypes: float64(1), int64(13)
memory usage: 33.3 KB
数据前5行预览：
age sex cp trestbps chol fbs restecg thalach exang oldpeak slope \
0 63 1 3 145 233 1 0 150 0 2.3 0
1 37 1 2 130 250 0 1 187 0 3.5 0
2 41 0 1 130 204 0 0 172 0 1.4 2
3 56 1 1 120 236 0 1 178 0 0.8 2
4 57 0 0 120 354 0 1 163 1 0.6 2
ca thal target
0 0 1 1
1 0 2 1
2 0 2 1
3 0 2 1
4 0 2 1
[]
<class 'pandas.core.frame.DataFrame'>
RangeIndex: 303 entries, 0 to 302
Data columns (total 14 columns):
# Column Non-Null Count Dtype
--- ------ -------------- -----
0 age 303 non-null int64
1 sex 303 non-null int64
2 cp 303 non-null int64
3 trestbps 303 non-null int64
4 chol 303 non-null int64
5 fbs 303 non-null int64
6 restecg 303 non-null int64
7 thalach 303 non-null int64
8 exang 303 non-null int64
9 oldpeak 303 non-null float64
10 slope 303 non-null int64
11 ca 303 non-null int64
12 thal 303 non-null int64
13 target 303 non-null int64
dtypes: float64(1), int64(13)
memory usage: 33.3 KB# 划分训练集和测试机
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
X = data.drop(['target'], axis=1) # 特征，axis=1表示按列删除
y = data['target'] # 标签
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42) # 划分数据集，20%作为测试集，随机种子为42
# 训练集和测试集的形状
print(f"训练集形状: {X_train.shape}, 测试集形状: {X_test.shape}") # 打印训练集和测试集的形状
训练集形状: (242, 13), 测试集形状: (61, 13)from sklearn.svm import SVC #支持向量机分类器
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier #K近邻分类器
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression #逻辑回归分类器
import xgboost as xgb #XGBoost分类器
import lightgbm as lgb #LightGBM分类器
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier #随机森林分类器
from catboost import CatBoostClassifier #CatBoost分类器
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier #决策树分类器
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB #高斯朴素贝叶斯分类器
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, precision_score, recall_score, f1_score # 用于评估分类器性能的指标
from sklearn.metrics import classification_report, confusion_matrix #用于生成分类报告和混淆矩阵
import warnings #用于忽略警告信息
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") # 忽略所有警告信息
接下来用多种不同模型评估
# SVM
svm_model = SVC(random_state=42)
svm_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
svm_pred = svm_model.predict(X_test)
print("\nSVM 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, svm_pred)) # 打印分类报告
print("SVM 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, svm_pred)) # 打印混淆矩阵
# 计算 SVM 评估指标，这些指标默认计算正类的性能
svm_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, svm_pred)
svm_precision = precision_score(y_test, svm_pred)
svm_recall = recall_score(y_test, svm_pred)
svm_f1 = f1_score(y_test, svm_pred)
print("SVM 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {svm_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {svm_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {svm_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {svm_f1:.4f}")
SVM 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.79 0.52 0.62 29
1 0.67 0.88 0.76 32
accuracy 0.70 61
macro avg 0.73 0.70 0.69 61
weighted avg 0.73 0.70 0.69 61
SVM 混淆矩阵：
[[15 14]
[ 4 28]]
SVM 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.7049
精确率: 0.6667
召回率: 0.8750
F1 值: 0.7568# KNN
knn_model = KNeighborsClassifier()
knn_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
knn_pred = knn_model.predict(X_test)
print("\nKNN 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, knn_pred))
print("KNN 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, knn_pred))
knn_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, knn_pred)
knn_precision = precision_score(y_test, knn_pred)
knn_recall = recall_score(y_test, knn_pred)
knn_f1 = f1_score(y_test, knn_pred)
print("KNN 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {knn_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {knn_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {knn_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {knn_f1:.4f}")
KNN 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.69 0.62 0.65 29
1 0.69 0.75 0.72 32
accuracy 0.69 61
macro avg 0.69 0.69 0.69 61
weighted avg 0.69 0.69 0.69 61
KNN 混淆矩阵：
[[18 11]
[ 8 24]]
KNN 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.6885
精确率: 0.6857
召回率: 0.7500
F1 值: 0.7164# 逻辑回归
logreg_model = LogisticRegression(random_state=42)
logreg_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
logreg_pred = logreg_model.predict(X_test)
print("\n逻辑回归 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, logreg_pred))
print("逻辑回归 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, logreg_pred))
logreg_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
logreg_precision = precision_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
logreg_recall = recall_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
logreg_f1 = f1_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
print("逻辑回归 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {logreg_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {logreg_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {logreg_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {logreg_f1:.4f}")
逻辑回归 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.89 0.86 0.88 29
1 0.88 0.91 0.89 32
accuracy 0.89 61
macro avg 0.89 0.88 0.88 61
weighted avg 0.89 0.89 0.89 61
逻辑回归 混淆矩阵：
[[25 4]
[ 3 29]]
逻辑回归 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.8852
精确率: 0.8788
召回率: 0.9062
F1 值: 0.8923# 逻辑回归
logreg_model = LogisticRegression(random_state=42)
logreg_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
logreg_pred = logreg_model.predict(X_test)
print("\n逻辑回归 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, logreg_pred))
print("逻辑回归 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, logreg_pred))
logreg_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
logreg_precision = precision_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
logreg_recall = recall_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
logreg_f1 = f1_score(y_test, logreg_pred)
print("逻辑回归 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {logreg_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {logreg_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {logreg_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {logreg_f1:.4f}")
逻辑回归 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.89 0.86 0.88 29
1 0.88 0.91 0.89 32
accuracy 0.89 61
macro avg 0.89 0.88 0.88 61
weighted avg 0.89 0.89 0.89 61
逻辑回归 混淆矩阵：
[[25 4]
[ 3 29]]
逻辑回归 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.8852
精确率: 0.8788
召回率: 0.9062
F1 值: 0.8923# 朴素贝叶斯
nb_model = GaussianNB()
nb_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
nb_pred = nb_model.predict(X_test)
print("\n朴素贝叶斯 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, nb_pred))
print("朴素贝叶斯 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, nb_pred))
nb_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, nb_pred)
nb_precision = precision_score(y_test, nb_pred)
nb_recall = recall_score(y_test, nb_pred)
nb_f1 = f1_score(y_test, nb_pred)
print("朴素贝叶斯 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {nb_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {nb_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {nb_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {nb_f1:.4f}")
朴素贝叶斯 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.84 0.90 0.87 29
1 0.90 0.84 0.87 32
accuracy 0.87 61
macro avg 0.87 0.87 0.87 61
weighted avg 0.87 0.87 0.87 61
朴素贝叶斯 混淆矩阵：
[[26 3]
[ 5 27]]
朴素贝叶斯 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.8689
精确率: 0.9000
召回率: 0.8438
F1 值: 0.8710# 决策树
dt_model = DecisionTreeClassifier(random_state=42)
dt_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
dt_pred = dt_model.predict(X_test)
print("\n决策树 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, dt_pred))
print("决策树 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, dt_pred))
dt_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, dt_pred)
dt_precision = precision_score(y_test, dt_pred)
dt_recall = recall_score(y_test, dt_pred)
dt_f1 = f1_score(y_test, dt_pred)
print("决策树 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {dt_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {dt_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {dt_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {dt_f1:.4f}")
决策树 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.69 0.86 0.77 29
1 0.84 0.66 0.74 32
accuracy 0.75 61
macro avg 0.77 0.76 0.75 61
weighted avg 0.77 0.75 0.75 61
决策树 混淆矩阵：
[[25 4]
[11 21]]
决策树 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.7541
精确率: 0.8400
召回率: 0.6562
F1 值: 0.7368# 随机森林
rf_model = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42)
rf_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
rf_pred = rf_model.predict(X_test)
print("\n随机森林 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, rf_pred))
print("随机森林 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, rf_pred))
rf_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, rf_pred)
rf_precision = precision_score(y_test, rf_pred)
rf_recall = recall_score(y_test, rf_pred)
rf_f1 = f1_score(y_test, rf_pred)
print("随机森林 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {rf_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {rf_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {rf_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {rf_f1:.4f}")
随机森林 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.83 0.83 0.83 29
1 0.84 0.84 0.84 32
accuracy 0.84 61
macro avg 0.84 0.84 0.84 61
weighted avg 0.84 0.84 0.84 61
随机森林 混淆矩阵：
[[24 5]
[ 5 27]]
随机森林 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.8361
精确率: 0.8438
召回率: 0.8438
F1 值: 0.8438# XGBoost
xgb_model = xgb.XGBClassifier(random_state=42)
xgb_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
xgb_pred = xgb_model.predict(X_test)
print("\nXGBoost 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, xgb_pred))
print("XGBoost 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, xgb_pred))
xgb_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, xgb_pred)
xgb_precision = precision_score(y_test, xgb_pred)
xgb_recall = recall_score(y_test, xgb_pred)
xgb_f1 = f1_score(y_test, xgb_pred)
print("XGBoost 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {xgb_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {xgb_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {xgb_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {xgb_f1:.4f}")
XGBoost 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.78 0.86 0.82 29
1 0.86 0.78 0.82 32
accuracy 0.82 61
macro avg 0.82 0.82 0.82 61
weighted avg 0.82 0.82 0.82 61
XGBoost 混淆矩阵：
[[25 4]
[ 7 25]]
XGBoost 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.8197
精确率: 0.8621
召回率: 0.7812
F1 值: 0.8197
# LightGBM
lgb_model = lgb.LGBMClassifier(random_state=42)
lgb_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
lgb_pred = lgb_model.predict(X_test)
print("\nLightGBM 分类报告：")
print(classification_report(y_test, lgb_pred))
print("LightGBM 混淆矩阵：")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, lgb_pred))
lgb_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, lgb_pred)
lgb_precision = precision_score(y_test, lgb_pred)
lgb_recall = recall_score(y_test, lgb_pred)
lgb_f1 = f1_score(y_test, lgb_pred)
print("LightGBM 模型评估指标：")
print(f"准确率: {lgb_accuracy:.4f}")
print(f"精确率: {lgb_precision:.4f}")
print(f"召回率: {lgb_recall:.4f}")
print(f"F1 值: {lgb_f1:.4f}")
[LightGBM] [Info] Number of positive: 133, number of negative: 109
[LightGBM] [Info] Auto-choosing row-wise multi-threading, the overhead of testing was 0.000094 seconds.
You can set `force_row_wise=true` to remove the overhead.
And if memory is not enough, you can set `force_col_wise=true`.
[LightGBM] [Info] Total Bins 238
[LightGBM] [Info] Number of data points in the train set: 242, number of used features: 13
[LightGBM] [Info] [binary:BoostFromScore]: pavg=0.549587 -> initscore=0.199001
[LightGBM] [Info] Start training from score 0.199001
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
[LightGBM] [Warning] No further splits with positive gain, best gain: -inf
LightGBM 分类报告：
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.81 0.86 0.83 29
1 0.87 0.81 0.84 32
accuracy 0.84 61
macro avg 0.84 0.84 0.84 61
weighted avg 0.84 0.84 0.84 61
LightGBM 混淆矩阵：
[[25 4]
[ 6 26]]
LightGBM 模型评估指标：
准确率: 0.8361
精确率: 0.8667
召回率: 0.8125
F1 值: 0.8387
扫一扫
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
