入门级介绍
首先声明是转载的文章
担心原文链接失效,所以这里自己又整理了一份。
一、四大数据库概述
目前国际上最重要的,具有权威性的心电数据库有四个:
美国麻省理工学院与Beth Israel医院联合建立的MIT-BIH心电数据库;
美国心脏学会的AHA心律失常心电数据库;
欧盟的CSE心电数据库;
欧盟ST-T心电数据库。
除此之外国际上被广泛认可的还有Sudden Cardiac DeathHolter Database,PTB Diagnostic ECG Database,PAF Prediction ChallengeDatabase等心电数据库。
1、美国的MIT-BIH心电数据库
美国的MIT-BIH心电数据库是目前在国际上应用最多的数据库,由很多子数据库组成,每个子数据库包含某类特定类型的心电记录,其中应用的最多的是MIT-BIT心律不齐数据库和MIT-BIT QT数据库。自1999年,在美国国家研究资源中心和国家健康研究院的支持下,他们将该数据库公开到了Internet上,整个MIT-BIT数据库的所有数据都可以免费下载和使用,国内外许多心电方面的研究都是基于该数据库的,使用该数据库作为实验数据的来源和各类识别算法的检测标准。
其包括:MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database、MIT-BIH Noise Stress Test Database、MIT-BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database、MIT-BIH ECG Compression Test Database、MIT-BIH Long-Term Database、MIT-BIH Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia Database、MIT-BIH Normal Sinus Rhythm Database、MIT-BIH ST Change Database、MIT-BIH Supraventricular Arrhythmia Database
部分子库的参数:
MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database
诊断: Arrhythmia(心律失常)
采样率:360 Hz
分辨率:11 bit
导联:2
每段数据持续时间:30+ min
储存格式:Format 212
详细介绍
给出了每个心拍类型分布,也给出了每条记录节律持续的时间。其中,*.atr 注释文件可以确定房颤发生的起点和终点。读取注释文件即可得知。
(AFIB 标志作为AF开始的起点,下一次节律变化“+”(属于beat annotation标识,无论是哪种节律)作为这段AF数据的终点。
python读取方法可见另一篇博客:wfdb查看ECG信号MITBIH数据库
23条记录源自住院病人,25条记录源自罕见但是临床上很重要。48条记录每一条记录都超过了30min。
下文来自官网:MITBIH
The first group is intended to serve as a representative sample of the variety of waveforms and artifact that an arrhythmia detector might encounter in routine clinical use. A table of random numbers was used to select tapes, and then to select half-hour segments of them. Segments selected in this way were excluded only if neither of the two ECG signals was of adequate quality for analysis by human experts.
Records in the second group were chosen to include complex ventricular, junctional, and supraventricular arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities. Several of these records were selected because features of the rhythm, QRS morphology variation, or signal quality may be expected to present significant difficulty to arrhythmia detectors; these records have gained considerable notoriety among database users.
The subjects were 25 men aged 32 to 89 years, and 22 women aged 23 to 89 years. (Records 201 and 202 came from the same male subject.)