the differences between local and shared object repositories

In general, the local object repository is easiest to use when you are creating simple tests, especially under the following conditions:

    • You have only one, or very few, tests that correspond to a given application, interface, or set of objects.
    • You do not expect to frequently modify object properties.
    • You generally create single-action tests.

Conversely, the shared object repository is generally the preferred option when:

    • You are creating tests using keyword-driven methodologies (not by recording).
    • You have several tests that test elements of the same application, interface, or set of objects.
    • You expect the object properties in your application to change from time to time and/or you regularly need to update or modify object properties.
    • You often work with multi-action tests and regularly use the Insert Copy of Action and Insert Call to Action options.

==================the following table doesn't associate with the title and I haven't understood the differences between object repository window and manager=============

 

The following table lists features and functionality, indicating if they are available in the Object Repository window or the Object Repository Manager:




Functionality

Object Repository window

Object Repository Manager


Y
 



 
Y



 
Y



 
Y



 
Y



 
Y



 
Y



 
Y


Y
 



 
Y


Y
 



 
Y


Y
 


Y
 

Y



 


Y
 

Y



 

Y



 

Y


Y
 


Y
 

Y

 


Y
 


Y
 



 
Y



 
N



 
Y


N
 



 
N



 
Y


N
 



 
Y



 
N



 
Y


N
 



 
Y


N
 



 
Y


Y
 


Y
 



 
N


Y
 



 
N



 
Y



 
N



 
Y


N
 


Y
 



 
N



 
Y


N
 



 
Y


Y
 



 
Y



 
N



 
Y



 
N


Y
 


N
 


Y
 

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值